Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dosimetric assessment of an Atlas based automated segmentation for loco-regional radiation therapy of early breast cancer in the Skagen Trial 1: A multi-institutional.
Advertisements

Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images 
Automated delineation of brain structures in patients undergoing radiotherapy for primary brain tumors: From atlas to dose–volume histograms  Manuel Conson,
Tumour-Targeted Treatment Intensification for Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance  Jessy Abed, RTT, MHScMRS, Jenny Lee, MMath, Tim.
Insert tables Insert graphs Insert figure
A multinational audit of small field output factors calculated by treatment planning systems used in radiotherapy  Wolfgang Lechner, Paulina Wesolowska,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Evaluation of localized region-based segmentation algorithms for CT-based delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy  Mehdi Astaraki, Mara Severgnini,
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Radiotherapy dose-distribution to the perirectal fat space (PRS) is related to gastrointestinal control-related complications  S.L. Gulliford, S. Ghose,
Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Dosimetric Benefits and Practical Pitfalls of Daily Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer  Nancy El-Bared, MD,
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 
VMAT radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy: The incidental effect of low-dose bath exposure  G. Lazzari, A. Terlizzi,
Resolution of atelectasis during radiochemotherapy of lung cancer with serious implications for further treatment. A case report  Lore Helene Braun, Stefan.
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Axillary radiotherapy for nodal lymphoma: What CTV expansion is required to account for absence of pre-chemotherapy treatment position FDG PET-CT?  Robin.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Potentials and challenges of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy  Sara Leibfarth, René M. Winter, Heidi Lyng, Daniel Zips, Daniela.
Advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy  Joshua Stoker, Sujay Vora, Ameet Patel, David.
Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer  Nina Boje.
Simultaneous integrated prophylactic cranial irradiation in sino-nasal cancer  Kenneth Jensen, Maja Bendtsen Sharma, Simon Lenler-Eriksen, Per Friis, Anne.
Volumetric modulated arc therapy based total body irradiation: Workflow and clinical experience with an indexed rotational immobilization system  Luo.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer  Katrina Woodford, Vanessa Panettieri, Trieumy Tran Le,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Radiotherapy for isolated granulocytic sarcoma: Case report and review of literature  Jose Antonio Dominguez Rullán, Eva Fernández Lizarbe, Belén Capuz,
Dosimetric assessment of an Atlas based automated segmentation for loco-regional radiation therapy of early breast cancer in the Skagen Trial 1: A multi-institutional.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Uncertainty evaluation of image-based tumour control probability models in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using a visual analytic tool  Oscar Casares-Magaz,
The posterior cerebellum, a new organ at risk?
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Whole-ventricular irradiation for intracranial germ cell tumors: Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam scanned protons, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Design, fabrication, and validation of patient-specific electron tissue compensators for postmastectomy radiation therapy  Daniel F. Craft, Peter Balter,
Rectal volume variations and estimated rectal dose during 8 weeks of image-guided radical 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer 
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a potential tool to assess and guide salivary gland irradiation 
Rune Slot Thing, Uffe Bernchou, Olfred Hansen, Carsten Brink 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Constantinos Zamboglou, Matthias Eiber, Thomas R
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Peter de Boer, Stefano Mandija, Anita M
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer  Jan Seppälä, Aleksi Voutilainen,
R. Botman, S. U. Tetar, M. A. Palacios, B. J. Slotman, F. J
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance  Dennis.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of two delineation guidelines for the radiation treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma  C. Bondue, S. Racadot,
Presentation transcript:

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Plan quality for high-risk prostate cancer treated with high field magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy  Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Christian Rønn Hansen, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Olfred Hansen, Carsten Brink, Uffe Bernchou  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 7, Pages 1-8 (July 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.006 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Example of PAP and MUP of a patient. Minor differences in dose distributions are seen. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 1-8DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.006) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Population mean DVHs for A) PTV78 and B) PTV56 of the group is shown for the standard PAPs (red) and MUPs (blue dashed). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 1-8DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.006) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Population mean DVHs for A) rectum, B) bowel, C) penile bulb, D) External contour, E) bladder, F) Right femoral joint and G) left femoral joint of the group is shown for the standard PAPs (red) and MUPs (blue). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 1-8DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.006) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. A.1 Schematic representation of individually passed dose constraints for OAR for each patient planned with PAP and MUP respectively. Vx is the volume of the OAR receiving ≤ x Gy. * There are 4 objectives to be met for rectum (See Method & materials section). These have been collapsed to 1 column, as all were met in all patients. ** There are 2 objectives to be met for femoral heads (V50 < 50% and V52 > 0%). As both were met in all patients they are collapsed into 1 column. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 1-8DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.006) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions