Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: Multicenter study in healthy volunteers  Radu Tutuian, Marcelo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011
Advertisements

Jia-Feng Wu, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Children Hospital.
High-Resolution Manometry & 24-hour Reflux Testing Swallowing: One Bite At A Time -or- Don ’ t Bite Off More Than You Can Chew Presented by Ron Turner,
Celiac Disease Genetics: Current Concepts and Practical Applications Ludvig M. Sollid, Benedicte A. Lie Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Volume.
Hiatal Hernia The American Journal of Medicine
Actions by Angiotensin II on Esophageal Contractility in Humans
Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distention in reflux patients with hiatal hernia  Peter J. Kahrilas*,
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
An Analysis of Lingual Contribution to Submental Surface Electromyographic Measures and Pharyngeal Pressure During Effortful Swallow  Maggie-Lee Huckabee,
Noncardiac Chest Pain Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
The Esophageal Epithelial Barrier in Health and Disease
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
Transsphincteric pH Profile at the Gastroesophageal Junction
An evidence-based approach to studies of the natural history of gastrointestinal diseases: Recurrence of symptomatic Crohn's disease after surgery  James.
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Obesity: A Challenge to Esophagogastric Junction Integrity
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Esophageal manometry: Assessment of interpreter consistency
Michael F. Vaezi, David Katzka, Frank Zerbib 
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages e17-e18 (April 2013)
The Role of Transsphincteric Pressure and Proximal Gastric Volume in Acid Reflux Before and After Fundoplication  Robert C.H. Scheffer, Hein G. Gooszen,
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Jaime A. Duffield, Peter W. Hamer, Richard Heddle, Richard H
Normal Values of Pharyngeal and Esophageal 24-Hour pH Impedance in Individuals on and off Therapy and Interobserver Reproducibility  Frank Zerbib, Sabine.
Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Esophageal Testing Compared to pH Alone for Diagnosing Both Acid and Weakly Acidic Gastroesophageal.
Short-Bowel Syndrome Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Tracings of concurrent oesophageal manometry, pH, and impedance.
Use of Direct, Endoscopic-Guided Measurements of Mucosal Impedance in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease  Elif Saritas Yuksel, Tina Higginbotham,
Mucosal Impedance Discriminates GERD From Non-GERD Conditions
Fasiha Kanwal, Ian M. Gralnek, Ron D
High-Resolution Manometry Studies Are Frequently Imperfect but Usually Still Interpretable  Sabine Roman, Peter J. Kahrilas, Lubomyr Boris, Kiran Bidari,
Erroneous Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Achalasia
Functional Dyspepsia Is Associated With Sleep Disorders
Michael Charlton  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Severe Constipation Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Management strategies for dysphagia with a normal-appearing esophagus
Benjamin Basseri, MD, Jeffrey L
Challenging the Limits of Esophageal Manometry
Radu Tutuian, Donald O Castell 
How to Effectively Use High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry
High-Resolution Manometry and Impedance-pH/Manometry: Valuable Tools in Clinical and Investigational Esophagology  Peter J. Kahrilas, Daniel Sifrim  Gastroenterology 
Neeraj Sharma, Amit Agrawal, Janice Freeman, Marcelo F
AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Development of Esophageal Peristalsis in Preterm and Term Neonates
Esophageal Diameter Is Decreased in Some Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Might Increase With Topical Corticosteroid Therapy  Joohee Lee, James.
Esophageal function testing
Barry Bowen, Yuhong Yuan, Cindy James, Ferid Rashid, Richard H. Hunt 
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves
Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry 
Approach to the Patient with Dysphagia
Albert B. Knapp, Lynn Ladetsky 
Esophageal variceal bleeding: Primary prophylaxis
The Utility of Intraluminal Impedance in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease–Like Symptoms But Normal Endoscopy and 24-Hour pH Testing  Michael.
Chronic Diarrhea Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Intraluminal Duodenal Diverticulum
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Cynthia W. Ko, Scott J. Schulte, Sum P. Lee 
Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Esophagus
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
Variation of Agreement in Polyp Size Measurement Between Computed Tomographic Colonography and Pathology Assessment: Clinical Implications  Samir Gupta,
Sildenafil Has No Effect on Portal Pressure but Lowers Arterial Pressure in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis  Puneeta Tandon, Irteza Inayat, Michael.
Neeraj Sharma, Amit Agrawal, Janice Freeman, Marcelo F
Angiomyolipoma of the Colon
Presentation transcript:

Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: Multicenter study in healthy volunteers  Radu Tutuian, Marcelo F. Vela, Nagammapudur S. Balaji, James L. Wise, Joseph A. Murray, Jeffrey H. Peters, Steven S. Shay, Donald O. Castell  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology  Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 174-182 (May 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0 Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 8-channel combined MII/EM catheter. Circumferential solid-state pressure sensors located in LES high-pressure zone (P-4) and 5 cm above it (P-3), unidirectional solid-state pressure sensors located 10 cm (P-2) and 15 cm (P-1) above LES. Impedance-measuring segments centered at 5 cm (Z-4), 10 cm (Z-3), 15 cm (Z-2), and 20 cm (Z-1) above LES. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Impedance changes observed during bolus transit over a single pair of measurement rings separated by 2 cm. A rapid rise in resistance is noted when air traveling in front of the bolus head reaches the impedance-measuring segment followed by a drop in impedance once higher conductive bolus material passes the measuring site. Bolus entry is considered at the 50% drop in impedance from baseline relative to nadir and bolus exit at the 50% recovery point from nadir to baseline. Lumen narrowing produced by the contraction transiently increases the impedance above baseline. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Definitions of impedance parameters: (A) TBTT as time elapsed between bolus entry at 20 cm above LES and bolus exit at 5 cm above LES, (B) bolus head advance time as time elapsed between bolus entry at 20 cm above LES and bolus entry at 15, 10, and 5 cm above LES, (C) bolus presence time (BPT) as time elapsed between bolus entry and bolus exit at each impedance measuring site (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm above LES), and (D) segmental transit times (STT) as time elapsed between bolus entry at a given level above LES and bolus exit at the nearby lower level. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Bolus head advance times (thin arrows) relative to bolus entry at 20 cm above LES and bolus presence times (thick arrows) of liquid and viscous boluses at 20, 15, 10, and 5 cm above LES. Segments represent bolus presence time at 20, 15, 10, and 5 cm above LES. Liquid boluses have shorter head advance times and longer bolus presence times compared to viscous boluses at any given level. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Example of manometrically ineffective contractions with (A) complete and (B) incomplete bolus transit. MII and EM channels indicate the level above the LES. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Total bolus transit time of manometrically normal, ineffective, and simultaneous swallows with complete bolus transit for liquid and viscous materials. Kruskal-Wallis H test indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) between different manometric categories for viscous swallows. Kruskal-Wallis test indicates bolus transit of ineffective viscous swallows with complete transit is significantly longer (P < 0.05) compared with total bolus transit of normal viscous swallows. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003 1, 174-182DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(03)70033-0) Copyright © 2003 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions