Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Evidence for an Upper Limit to Mitotic Spindle Length
Recruitment of Mad2 to the Kinetochore Requires the Rod/Zw10 Complex
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint  Alexei Mikhailov, Richard W Cole,
Inhibition of Aurora B Kinase Blocks Chromosome Segregation, Overrides the Spindle Checkpoint, and Perturbs Microtubule Dynamics in Mitosis  Marko J.
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Determinants of Myosin II Cortical Localization during Cytokinesis
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e3 (September 2018)
Multiple Mechanisms Contribute to Centriole Separation in C. elegans
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Cancer Cells Display Profound Intra- and Interline Variation following Prolonged Exposure to Antimitotic Drugs  Karen E. Gascoigne, Stephen S. Taylor 
Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells
Wood Cell-Wall Structure Requires Local 2D-Microtubule Disassembly by a Novel Plasma Membrane-Anchored Protein  Yoshihisa Oda, Yuki Iida, Yuki Kondo,
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Kai Yuan, Antony W. Shermoen, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Stephanie C. Weber, Clifford P. Brangwynne  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Progressive Activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 Coordinates Entry to Mitosis
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Joshua N. Bembenek, John G. White, Yixian Zheng  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
The spindle assembly checkpoint
Volume 19, Issue 21, Pages (November 2009)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Viktoriya Syrovatkina, Chuanhai Fu, Phong T. Tran  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (May 2002)
Anaphase B Precedes Anaphase A in the Mouse Egg
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Premature Sister Chromatid Separation Is Poorly Detected by the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint as a Result of System-Level Feedback  Mihailo Mirkovic, Lukas H.
Cell-Cycle Progression without an Intact Microtubule Cytoskeleton
Fig. 3. The checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1 remain associated with the kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells entering anaphase.(A–C)
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Jeffrey K. Moore, Valentin Magidson, Alexey Khodjakov, John A. Cooper 
Cnn Dynamics Drive Centrosome Size Asymmetry to Ensure Daughter Centriole Retention in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Paul T. Conduit, Jordan W. Raff  Current.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Markus Kaspar, Axel Dienemann, Christine Schulze, Frank Sprenger 
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Cyclin B3 Is a Mitotic Cyclin that Promotes the Metaphase-Anaphase Transition  Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 811-816 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2015 25, 811-816DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mitotic Cyclins, but Not the SAC, Dictate Timing of Anaphase Onset (A) Schematic showing that checkpoint release by the first aligned spindle hurries the slower prometaphases into anaphase in a syncytium. (B–G) Mitotic progress was visualized in real time by following H2AvD-GFP produced from a transgene (B, D–G), or from injected mRNA (C). Frames from videos at the indicated times (min:s) show mitosis 13 beginning at prometaphase. The time lapse to the beginning of chromosome separation reveals the timing of metaphase-anaphase in the different genotypes and injected embryos. Scale bar, 5 μm. (H) Comparison of metaphase duration. SAC-deficient embryos did not differ significantly from wild-type (unpaired t test, control versus mad2p: p = 0.0752; control versus mad2p+bubR1ΔKEN: p = 0.0929). Changing the levels of particular cyclins had a cyclin-type-specific effect on metaphase duration. No obvious metaphase was seen in Cyclin A- and B-depleted embryos (star), whereas a prolonged metaphase was observed when the level of Cyclin A and B was increased by mRNA injection (unpaired t test, p < 0.0001). Knockdown of Cyclin B3 extended metaphase (unpaired t test, p < 0.0001), and Cyclin B3 mRNA injection slightly shortened metaphase (unpaired t test, p = 0.0124). Error bars represent the SD. Current Biology 2015 25, 811-816DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Full Stabilization of Cyclin B3 Requires Both the SAC and Early Cyclins (A) Schematic of the experiments showing the approximate stage of each injection. (B and C) Colchicine injection induced mitotic arrest in control, but not in Cyclin A+B knockdown, embryos. Mitotic chromosomes were visualized by H2AvD-RFP (red), and nuclear envelope was visualized by injection of fluorescently labeled wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (green). Compare based on indicated timing (min:s) not alignment. (D–F) Characterization of Cyclin B3 degradation under different conditions. Cyclin B3-GFP (green) was stabilized by colchicine in wild-type, but not in Cyclin A+B-depleted, embryos. APC/C inhibitor UbcH10C114S blocked this destruction. Mitotic chromosomes were visualized by H2AvD-RFP (red). Note that in (E) chromosomes exited from mitosis after Cyclin B3-GFP degradation. Scale bar, 5 μm. (G) Quantitation of Cyclin B3-GFP fluorescent intensity after colchicine injection. Total fluorescence of each frame was measured, normalized, and plotted against time (minutes into mitosis). Cyclin B3-GFP was similarly stabilized by injection of recombinant Cyclin B proteins and a known inhibitor of the APC/C, UbcH10C114S. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Movie S2. Current Biology 2015 25, 811-816DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cyclin B3 Promotes the Metaphase-Anaphase Transition (A) The metaphase extension observed in Cyclin B3 RNAi-treated embryos was SAC independent, as a similar delay in metaphase was observed in SAC-deficient mad2p embryos (unpaired t test, control versus Cyclin B3 RNAi in mad2p embryos, p < 0.0001). Error bars represent the SD. (B and C) Colchicine treatment in mad2p embryos with or without Cyclin B3 knockdown. Chromosomes were visualized by an H2AvD-GFP transgene. Mitotic exit was delayed in Cyclin B3 RNAi-treated embryos (chromosome decondensation at 07:44 in control versus 12:46 in Cyclin B3 RNAi-treated embryos). Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Duration of mitotic phase in the Cyclin B3 knockdown embryos was significantly longer than that in either control or the other cyclin RNAi-treated embryos (unpaired t test, p < 0.0001). Error bars represent the SD. See also Figure S3 and Movie S3. Current Biology 2015 25, 811-816DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Developmental Regulation of Cyclin B3’s Activity in Promoting Anaphase Onset (A and B) Representative images of young embryos from heterozygous and homozygous Cyclin B3 mutant females. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) An image of an older embryo from homozygous Cyclin B3 mutant females. Microtubules are shown in red and DNA in green. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) No significant metaphase delay was observed in neuroblast cells from Cyclin B3 null third-instar larvae (unpaired t test, p = 0.3954). Error bars represent the SD. (E) Metaphase-anaphase transition is timed by a cyclin-based intrinsic timer and a backup checkpoint. Since there is an intrinsic timer that paces the progress of mitotic events, a safety mechanism that stalls progress in response to improperly aligned chromosomes is of no consequence if alignment is achieved before the intrinsic timer has lapsed. However, fluctuations in the time required for alignment or of the pace of the intrinsic timer might occur as a result of environmental stress or as part of normal development. As soon as the intrinsic timer fails to accommodate chromosome alignment, the checkpoint will automatically take over regulation without requiring a significant change in regulatory arrangement. See also Movies S4 and S5. Current Biology 2015 25, 811-816DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.053) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions