Yitao Ma, Dinara Shakiryanova, Irina Vardya, Sergey V Popov 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus, Margaret L. Gardel  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Fanny Jaulin, Xiaoxiao Xue, Enrique Rodriguez-Boulan, Geri Kreitzer 
Cortical Microtubule Contacts Position the Spindle in C
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages (November 2004)
Yalei Chen, Melissa M. Rolls, William O. Hancock  Current Biology 
Cell-Length-Dependent Microtubule Accumulation during Polarization
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
History-Dependent Catastrophes Regulate Axonal Microtubule Behavior
Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2013)
Golgi Outposts Shape Dendrite Morphology by Functioning as Sites of Acentrosomal Microtubule Nucleation in Neurons  Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney, Lily Yeh.
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Mixed Microtubules Steer Dynein-Driven Cargo Transport into Dendrites
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
Long-Range Ca2+ Signaling from Growth Cone to Soma Mediates Reversal of Neuronal Migration Induced by Slit-2  Chen-bing Guan, Hua-tai Xu, Ming Jin, Xiao-bing.
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Actin Waves: Origin of Cell Polarization and Migration?
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Converging Populations of F-Actin Promote Breakage of Associated Microtubules to Spatially Regulate Microtubule Turnover in Migrating Cells  Stephanie.
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Noam E. Ziv, Stephen J Smith  Neuron 
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Susana Gomis-Rüth, Corette J. Wierenga, Frank Bradke  Current Biology 
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Rapid Assembly of Presynaptic Materials behind the Growth Cone in Dopaminergic Neurons Is Mediated by Precise Regulation of Axonal Transport  David M.
Control of Centriole Length by CPAP and CP110
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Kinesin-5 Is Essential for Growth-Cone Turning
Peripheral, Non-Centrosome-Associated Microtubules Contribute to Spindle Formation in Centrosome-Containing Cells  U.S. Tulu, N.M. Rusan, P. Wadsworth 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Three-Step Model for Polarized Sorting of KIF17 into Dendrites
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Converging Populations of F-Actin Promote Breakage of Associated Microtubules to Spatially Regulate Microtubule Turnover in Migrating Cells  Stephanie.
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Daniel M Suter, Andrew W Schaefer, Paul Forscher  Current Biology 
Sonita R Chada, Peter J Hollenbeck  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
The Role of Selective Transport in Neuronal Protein Sorting
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Self-Organization of Minimal Anaphase Spindle Midzone Bundles
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Presentation transcript:

Quantitative Analysis of Microtubule Transport in Growing Nerve Processes  Yitao Ma, Dinara Shakiryanova, Irina Vardya, Sergey V Popov  Current Biology  Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 725-730 (April 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.061

Figure 1 Visualization of GFP-EB1 Comets in Xenopus Embryo Cell Cultures (A–C) Fluorescence images of neuronal (A and B) and fibroblast-like (C) cells expressing GFP-EB1. In fibroblasts, the majority of GFP-EB1 dashes originate at the MT-organizing center (marked with an arrow). Boxed regions containing single comets are shown at higher magnification at the lower right corner of each panel. The comets have a characteristic shape with a bright front and progressively dimmer tail. In neurons, comets can be detected in the proximal axon (A) as well as along the axonal shaft (A and B). The number of comets is higher in the vicinity of the growth cone (B). (D) Distribution of GFP-EB1 comets along the length of the axon. Axons chosen for analysis were 500–600 μm in length. Each axon was divided into 10 equal segments, and the number of EB1 comets was determined for each segment. Points 0 and 1 on the x axis correspond to the cell body and the growth cone regions, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SEM for 10 different axons. (E and F) Fluorescence images of the distal axon of a neuron expressing GFP-EB1 before (E) and 3 min after (F) superfusion with 100 nM taxol. GFP-EB1 comets are clearly visible in control conditions (E). No GFP-EB1 comets can be detected after taxol treatment (F). The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2004 14, 725-730DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.061)

Figure 2 Visualization of MT Assembly in the Axonal Shaft of Xenopus Neurons (A) Fluorescence micrograph of a GFP-EB1-expressing neuron. The distal axon is at the left of the micrograph. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Kymograph of the boxed region in (A). Both anterograde (downward displacement) and retrograde (upward displacement) movement of GFP-EB1 comets is observed. (C) Displacement of 14 randomly chosen EB1 comets along the axon versus time. Images were acquired at 3 s intervals. Movement in the anterograde direction is considered positive. In all cases the movement can be fitted with a linear function. (D and E) Velocity distribution of comets moving in the anterograde (D) and retrograde (E) direction in the axonal shaft of Xenopus neurons. For each comet, the average velocity was calculated for a 9 s interval. The data were fitted with a normal distribution function. The average rates of comet movement are 13.9 ± 3.7 and 13.9 ± 3.2 and the highest velocities are 25.1 μm/min and 26.3 μm/min for plus-end-distal (anterograde movement) and plus-end-proximal (retrograde comet movement) MTs, respectively. Current Biology 2004 14, 725-730DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.061)

Figure 3 Fast Axonal Transport of Tubulin-Containing Structures in Growing Neurons (A) Fluorescence micrograph of an axon after photobleaching. The size of the bleached zone was approximately 5 μm. The area chosen for photobleaching was flat, facilitating detection of transported structures. The first image was acquired immediately after photobleaching. Time after photobleaching is noted in seconds at the upper left corner of each panel. Elongated fluorescence structures (tubulin “parcels”) are transported through the bleached zone in an anterograde direction. The leading and the trailing edges of one of the parcels are marked with arrows and an arrowhead, respectively. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) The velocity distribution of tubulin parcels transported in the anterograde direction. Measurements of the rate of movement were made by determination of the displacement of the tubulin parcels for a period of 1 s. The average anterograde velocity was 1.69 ± 0.05 μm/min (data from 26 tubulin parcels in seven different neurons). The peak velocity was 2.46 ± 0.14 μm/min. (C) Tubulin-expressing neuron before (top) and 22 s after photobleaching (middle and lower images). The images after photobleaching are identical. However, the digital contrast in the lower image was digitally enhanced to facilitate detection of a tubulin parcel. The middle image was processed identical to the top one. The parcel cannot be detected without digital enhancement, which indicates that its fluorescenceintensity is significantly lower than that of individual MTs. The graph on the right represents quantitative analysis of the data. The open bar represents background-subtracted fluorescence intensity of individual MTs (arbitrary units, data from 49 MTs in seven neurons) and the shaded bar represents fluorescence intensity of tubulin parcels (66 tubulin parcels in seven neurons). The scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Series of fluorescence images of the bleached zone. The images were acquired at 1 s intervals approximately 10 s after photobleaching. Overlaying two of the transported structures with red and blue facilitated their tracking. Time after the onset of recording is noted in seconds at the upper left corner of each panel. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (E) (Left) Flat axonal region 70 s after photobleaching. Photobleaching of the axon was incomplete to allow for the simultaneous visualization of single MTs and transported tubulin parcels. The middle panel represents images from the boxed region acquired at 1 s intervals. Time after the start of time-lapse recording is in seconds. (Right) Transported tubulin parcel from the middle panel is shown in blue and the underlying MT is shown in red. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (F) Fluorescence images (taken at 1 s intervals) of axonal segment ≅ 3 min after application of 10 μM vinblastine. The tubulin parcel is transported in the anterograde direction (to the right). Fluorescence intensity of the tubulin parcel at the trailing edge (marked with arrows) changes significantly from frame to frame. Time after the start of recording is in seconds. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2004 14, 725-730DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.061)