CONFIRM 2 INTERIM ANALYSIS Results of an Interim Analysis of a Multinational Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study in Patients With Previously Treated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Mizutomo Azuma 1, Michael M. Shi 2, Christian J. Jacques 2, Carl Barrett 2, Kathleen D. Danenberg 3, Syma Iqbal 1, Anthony El-Khoueiry 1, Dongyun Yang.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Intratumoral mRNA expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and HIF-1 pathway to predict outcome to VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
FOLFOX4 with or without Bevacizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results from ECOG-E3200 Lee M Ellis, MD Colorectal Cancer Update.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-line Chemotherapy with FOLFOX.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “VELOUR” Study
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
在使用Sorafenib治療肝細胞癌過程中患有
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Pazopanib: the role in the treatment of mRCC
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
KEYNOTE-086 (Cohort A): Phase II Evaluation of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic TNBC CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of.
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
SIRveNIB: Randomized Phase III Trial of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy vs Sorafenib in Locally Advanced HCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Joensuu H et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA1.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Regorafenib TAS-102 or TAS-102 Regorafenib
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
for the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Presentation transcript:

CONFIRM 2 INTERIM ANALYSIS Results of an Interim Analysis of a Multinational Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Receiving FOLFOX4 and PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) or Placebo C.-H. Koehne, E. Bajetta, E. Lin, E. Van Cutsem, J.R. Hecht, J.-Y. Douillard, M. Moore, C. Germond, D. Laurent, C. Jacques

PTK/ZK Inhibits All Known VEGF Receptors VEGF-A VEGF-B PlGF VEGF-A VEGF-C VEGF-D VEGF-C VEGF-D Extracellular Endothelial Cell Intracellular PTK/ZK PTK/ZK PTK/ZK PTK/ZK mechanism of action and the VEGF pathway In order for a tumor cell to grow past 1-2mm, it requires the development of new blood vessels. To develop new vasculature, tumor cells secrete molecules that belong to the VEGF family of ligands (VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D) that bind to a specific set of VEGF receptors located on the cell surfaces of nearby endothelial cells. Illustrated here is the cell surface of a target endothelial cell. When a VEGF ligand binds to its cell surface receptor, the receptor tyrosine kinase is activated. The activated receptor tyrosine kinase induces a signal transduction cascade inside the cell. If VEGF-R1 or VEGF-R2 is activated, the ultimate outcome of the signal transduction is tumor angiogenesis. If VEGF-R3 is activated, lymphangiogenesis occurs. PTK/ZK blocks the tyrosine kinase activity of all VEGF receptors, preventing activation of signaling pathways required for tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. PTK/ZK also inhibits c-KIT and/ or PDGFR- receptor which may also play a role in dimerizing with VEGFRs to promote the growth and spread of tumors. PDGFR-  is stimulated by PDGF and c-KIT is likewise stimulated by SCF. References: 1. Bold G, Altmann KH, Frei J, et al. New anilinophthalazines as potent and orally well absorbed inhibitors of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases useful as antagonists of tumor-driven angiogenesis. J Med Chem. 2000;43(12):2310-23. 2. Wood JM, Bold G, Buchdunger E, et al. PTK787/ZK 222584, a novel and potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, impairs vascular endothelial growth factor-induced responses and tumor growth after oral administration. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2178-2189. Abbreviations: Flt, fms-like tyrosine kinase; KDR, kinase domain-containing receptor; PlGF, placenta growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; SCF, stem cell factor ; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor VEGFR-1/Flt-1 VEGFR-2/KDR VEGFR-3/Flt-4 Angiogenesis Angiogenesis Lymphangiogenesis Tumor metastasis PTK/ZK also inhibits PDGFR-b and c-KIT

CONFIRM 2 Study Design CONFIRM 2 855 patients FOLFOX 4 + Stratification Factors: PS: 0, 1-2 LDH: ≤, >1.5 x ULN R A N D O M I Z E FOLFOX 4 + PTK/ZK (n=426) 1250 mg po qd Multinational randomized phase III trial in irinotecan-pretreated mCRC patients CONFIRM 2 855 patients FOLFOX 4 + Placebo (n=429) CONFIRM-2 study design CONFIRM-2 is a large multinational, randomized trial of 855 patients with previously treated for metastatic disease with irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine-based therapies. Patients were randomized from January 2003 through October 2004. Patients were pre-stratified based on WHO performance status (PS 0 vs 1-2) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (< 1.5 or > 1.5 x ULN). Performance status and LDH levels have been shown in previous studies to be strong prognostic indicators of clinical outcome. Patients were then randomized to receive FOLFOX-4 with oral PTK/ZK (1250 mg daily) or placebo.

CONFIRM Study Design CONFIRM 1 1168 patients CONFIRM 2 855 patients Stratification Factors: PS: 0, 1-2 LDH: ≤, >1.5 x ULN 1st line mCRC CONFIRM 1 1168 patients R A N D O M I Z E FOLFOX 4 + PTK/ZK 1250 mg po qd CONFIRM 2 855 patients 2nd line mCRC FOLFOX 4 + Placebo CONFIRM-2 study design CONFIRM-2 is a large multinational, randomized trial of 855 patients with previously treated for metastatic disease with irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine-based therapies. Patients were randomized from January 2003 through October 2004. Patients were pre-stratified based on WHO performance status (PS 0 vs 1-2) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (< 1.5 or > 1.5 x ULN). Performance status and LDH levels have been shown in previous studies to be strong prognostic indicators of clinical outcome. Patients were then randomized to receive FOLFOX-4 with oral PTK/ZK (1250 mg daily) or placebo.

CONFIRM 1: Progression Free Survival (ASCO 2005) Overall Patients High LDH Patients 100 100 HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.03) P value = 0.118 HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.82) P value = 0.001 75 75 Progression-Free Survival, % 50 Progression-Free Survival, % 50 25 25 FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo The primary overall PFS endpoint was not met by central review. However the subgroup analysis of patients with high LDH showed a clear benefit. FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 Time Since Randomization, mo Time Since Randomization, mo

CONFIRM 2: Main Patient Eligibility Criteria Patients with mCRC Pretreatment for metastatic disease with irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy Measurable disease per RECIST WHO PS of 0-2 Adequate hematological and organ function No exclusions for prior coagulopathy or bleeding Patients were NOT excluded due to prior coagulopathy or bleeding. RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

CONFIRM 2: Study Objectives Primary end point: Overall survival Statistical hypothesis: One-year overall survival rate from 36% to 45% (HR 0.782, 90% power, 5% level of significance with 692 events) Key secondary end points: Overall survival in high LDH (> 1.5 x ULN) patients Progression free survival* Overall population High LDH population (> 1.5 x ULN) Overall response rate (RECIST) *Assessed by investigators following RECIST criteria.

Patient Characteristics FOLFOX4 Plus Characteristics PTK/ZK (n = 426) Placebo (n = 429) Median age, y 62.0 60.0 Number of patients, n (%) Low LDH (≤ 1.5 x ULN) 302 (71) 303 (71) High LDH (> 1.5 x ULN) 124 (29) 126 (29) Prior adjuvant chemotherapy, % 31 Male/female ratio, % 62/38 WHO PS, 0/1-2, % 53/47 Colon/rectum, % 68/30 72/26 Metastasis, % Liver 73 77 Lung 48 44 Number of organs involved, % 1 40 41 2 34 33 ≥ 3 26 27 Patient characteristics The arms of the trial were balanced. There are slightly more male patients in the PTK/ZK arm. A higher number of patients in the PTK/ZK arm had colon cancer rather than rectal cancer. Liver metastases were common in both arms. The majority of the patients had PS 0. Median LDH level in both arms were 0.95 X ULN Note to presenter: The percentages for “Number of organs involved” in the Placebo group are 40.6, 32.6, 26.6 and 0.2% for 1, 2, >/=3, and missing groups, respectively.

Patient Disposition FOLFOX4 Plus PTK/ZK, % (n = 426) Placebo, % Patients ongoing* 12 11 Patient discontinuation Progressive disease 52 70 Adverse event 15 8 Withdrawal of consent 13 5 Other reasons 6 Patient disposition was measured at the time of data cut-off. Note that more patients discontinued the study in the placebo arm due to progressive disease (by 18%), Whereas more patients discontinued due to adverse events or withdrawal of consent in the PTK/ZK arm (7 and 8% respectively) *At time of data cut-off, patients are continuing study treatment.

Safety and Tolerability FOLFOX4 Plus Adverse Events PTK/ZK, % (n = 421) Placebo, % ( > 5% Patients) Grade 3 Grade 4 Neutropenia 17 12 16 Thrombocytopenia 5 < 1 4 Peripheral neuropathy Diarrhea 8 Nausea 11 Vomiting 9 Abdominal pain 1 Hypertension 21 Dizziness Venous thrombosis Toxicity is outline in the slide in: Hematologic, GI-related, Hypertension is anticipated. Dizziness was a frequent complaint, however was seldom severe and was well-managed by taking medication

Other Clinically Important Adverse Events FOLFOX4 Plus Adverse Events, n (%) PTK/ZK (n = 421) Placebo (n = 421) Bleeding, all grades 59 (14%) 48 (11%) Bleeding, grade 3/4 9 (2.5%) 10 (2.2%) Arterial thrombosis, grade 3/4 13 (3%) 6 (1.5%) Bowel perforation Encephalopathy 4 (1%) All cause mortality 36 (9%) 26 (6%) (within 28 days of last study drug administration) Adverse events associated with inhibition of VEGF pathway Listed here are adverse events associated with the inhibition of VEGF pathway. In contrast to another anti-VEGF therapy, PTK/ZK did not result in an increase of bleeding, arterial thrombosis or bowel perforation. Overall deaths from any cause within 28 days of last study drug administration were similar in both study arms.

Response Rate FOLFOX4 Plus Responses PTK/ZK, % (n = 426) Placebo, % (n = 429) Overall response Complete response Partial response 19 2 17 18 1 17 Stable disease 43 Progressive disease 31 35 Duration of disease stabilization (duration of CR/PR/SD): 7.7 mo 5.8 mo Response rate Response rates were similar in both arms with approximately 20% of patients responding and 31-35% with progressive disease.

Overall Survival*: Overall Population 12.1 mo PTK/ZK vs 11.8 mo Placebo HR = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.14) P value = 0.51 25 50 75 100 Time Since Randomization, mo Overall Survival, % 4 8 12 16 20 24 FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo PTK/ZK Placebo 426 429 373 377 239 234 115 119 48 56 14 5 *Overall survival results based on interim analysis values; final data available end of 2006.

Progression Free Survival: Overall Population 100 5.6 mo PTK/ZK vs 4.1 mo Placebo HR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.98) P value = 0.026 75 75 Progression-Free Survival, % 50 25 FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo 4 8 12 16 20 Time since randomization, mo PTK/ZK Placebo 426 429 194 182 49 38 10 6 2

Progression Free Survival: High LDH Patients 100 5.6 mo PTK/ZK vs 3.8 mo Placebo HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.80) P value = < 0.001 75 Progression-Free Survival, % 50 25 FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo 4 8 12 16 Time Since Randomization, mo PTK/ZK Placebo 124 126 68 48 18 8 5 2 2

Overall Survival*: High LDH Patients 100 9.6 mo PTK/ZK vs 7.5 mo Placebo HR = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.05) P value = 0.105 75 Overall Survival, % 50 25 FOLFOX4 + PTK/ZK FOLFOX4 + Placebo Approximate 2 months difference in OS 0.78 HR is favorable for PTK/ZK and clinically meaningful, even though the nominal p value does not reach statistical significance 4 8 12 16 20 24 Time Since Randomization, mo PTK/ZK Placebo 124 126 108 94 61 45 21 16 8 2 1 *Overall survival results based on interim analysis values; final data available end of 2006.

Progression Free Survival by LDH Stratum: HR in CONFIRM 2 PFS by LDH Stratum: Hazard Ratio in CONFIRM 2 and 1 HR P value Overall Population 0.83 0.026 CONFIRM 2 0.83 0.026 CONFIRM 1* High LDH Low LDH 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Favors PTK/ZK Favors Placebo *Investigator-based assessment of CONFIRM 1.

Bulky/Hypoxic Tumors Boost HIF-1a Which Upregulates VEGF and LDH HIF-1a stabilization HIF-1a/ARNT LDH-A HRE VEGF-A VEGFR-1 nucleus LDH-5 As tumors grow and expand in excess of 2 mm in diameter, they become bulky and take on a hypoxic-like phenotype. Hypoxia-like stressors lead to the stabilization and translocation of HIF-1a into the nucleus to transactivate a number of tumor sustaining pathways, including: LDH-A and glucose transporters for anaerobic glycolysis VEGF-A and VEGFR-1 to stimulate angiogenesis Literature and research support for high LDH in bulky/ hypoxic tumors include: Strong correlation between serum LDH and intratumoral VEGF-A or VEGFR-1 gene expression in mCRC patient tumor samples (Azuma et al, ASCO #3530) Up-regulation of LDH5 in CRC cells associated with invasion, metastasis and tumor hypoxia (Koukourakis et al., Clin. Exp. Metas. 2005; 22(1):25-30.) GLUT-1, -3 NOS Anaerobic glycolysis Angiogenesis EPO Erythropoiesis Adapted from Harris AL. Nature Rev Cancer. 2002;2:38-47.

PTK/ZK Summary CONFIRM 2 Well-tolerated safety profile with anticipated antiangiogenic drug-related effects No OS benefit for overall population based on interim analysis PTK/ZK improved PFS for overall population (HR = 0.83, P = 0.026) PTK/ZK significantly improved PFS in high LDH patients (HR = 0.61, P < 0.001) PTK/ZK improved OS for patients with high LDH (HR = 0.78, P = 0.105) Efficacy and safety results in overall population and high LDH patients are highly consistent between CONFIRM 1 and CONFIRM 2 New studies in mCRC patients with high LDH are planned Further development of PTK/ZK is ongoing in mCRC and additional tumor types Slightly increases GI toxicity, hypertension and dizziness

Acknowledgments The patients and their families The investigators in over 200 medical centers worldwide The Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp, US and Schering AG, Germany CONFIRM team Related PTK/ZK ASCO presentations Major et al. #3529 CONFIRM 1/2 meta-analysis Azuma et al. #3530 Association of serum LDH with genes in the angiogenesis pathways in mCRC patients