Crystal structure of vancomycin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Crystal structure of vancomycin
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Crystal Structure of Streptococcus mutans Pyrophosphatase
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2000)
Two structurally different RNA molecules are bound by the spliceosomal protein U1A using the same recognition strategy  Luca Jovine, Chris Oubridge, Johanna.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Collagen Stabilization at Atomic Level
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Getting the Adrenaline Going
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structures of Two Repeats of Spectrin Suggest Models of Flexibility
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Crystal Structure of Saccharopine Reductase from Magnaporthe grisea, an Enzyme of the α-Aminoadipate Pathway of Lysine Biosynthesis  Eva Johansson, James.
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The crystal structure of an intact human Max–DNA complex: new insights into mechanisms of transcriptional control  P Brownlie, TA Ceska, M Lamers, C Romier,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1995)
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor
Presentation transcript:

Crystal structure of vancomycin Martina Schäfer, Thomas R Schneider, George M Sheldrick  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 1509-1515 (December 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6

Figure 1 Structural formula of vancomycin. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 2 Stereo projection of the unedited structure obtained by the ab initio solution of the structure of the vancomycin dimer. The two vancomycin molecules can be easily recognized, although no chemical information was used in the structure solution. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 3 The crystal structure after refinement. (a) Stereo projection of the dimer in a similar orientation to Figure 7a in [10]. The dimer interface lies approximately in a vertical plane at right angles to this diagram, and the pseudo-twofold axis (for all the atoms except those of the sugars at the top of the diagram) lies approximately vertical. (b,c) Different views (not a stereoview) of the two monomers, in roughly the same orientation as the structural formula (Figure 1). The atoms are conventionally colour coded according to element type. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 4 The dimer interface and binding pockets of vancomycin. (a) Electron density (contoured at 0.8 σ); the green lines represent hydrogen bonds. (b) Hydrogen bonding distances for the same section. In one monomer the binding pocket is closed by the asparagine sidechain occupying the place of a ligand, in the other (lower) it is occupied by an acetate ion which is held in place by three hydrogen bonds. Taking into account the further hydrogen bonds that a peptide would make with the two halves of the vancomycin molecule and the twofold symmetry axis at right angles to this projection, the two bound peptide chains of the nascent cell wall would be oriented at roughly 180° to one another. (Figure 4a generated using the program XtalView [30].) Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 5 Space filling models of the vancomycin dimer, showing the particularly close fit of the two monomer units; the dimer interface lies approximately vertical in this view. (a) Conventional colour coding, but with the acetate ion in one of the binding pockets shown in yellow (upper left); the NH2 group of the terminal asparagine amide lies above the closed binding pocket (lower right). (b) Linear colour ramp for the thermal displacement amplitudes. The most mobile atoms are orange, the least mobile blue; pink and purple are intermediate. Although the binding pocket occupied by an acetate ion is flexible, the binding pocket closed by the asparagine sidechain is more rigid. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 6 Proposed insertion of the vancomycin dimer (the two halves of the box represent the two monomers) between two different polymeric disaccharide-pentapeptide strands, preventing linking of the strands. This linking would require a lysine sidechain to substitute for the C-terminal D-alanine as shown on the right of the diagram. For simplicity only the last three amino acids of the pentapeptide branches are labelled. This diagram should be compared with Figure 2 of reference [7]. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)

Figure 7 Superposition of the two monomers based on a least-squares fit of all non-sidechain atoms of the two monomers. The major differences are localized in the regions of the sugars (upper part of figure) and the binding pockets (lower right). Standard element colours are used for the atoms. Structure 1996 4, 1509-1515DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00156-6)