Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Strategy One Provide needs-based, relevant, quality programs, training, and services to individuals and businesses that compete in a global economy.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
Purpose …to strengthen and support quality career and technical education programs and initiatives…
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Learning Exchanges: Models and Approaches 1. Agenda What is a learning exchange? What models/approaches are other countries and US states using?? “Lessons.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Pennsylvania’s 21 st Century Workforce Initiatives.
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements 2011.
Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, RSCCD “Plan to Plan”
Strategic Planning Strategic planning follows "the five question logic” ("Who are we? Where are we now? Where do we want to be? How do we get there? How.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Shared Leadership for a Stronger Montana Economy State Higher Education Executive Officers Workforce & Economic Development Committee July 20, 2005.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
1 A REPORT ON THE MEASURES OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS FOR November 2009.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
Educational Master Plan Update Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) November 19, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Educational Master Plan Update Open Forum November 11, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Student success is the highest priority of every community college in Texas and our legislative priorities reflect this core principle. The member colleges.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
Achieving the Dream to Strategic Plan
A Brief Look at Career and Technical Education NCCCS - Perkins Update
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
STRATEGIC PLAN Emerging Ideas in Support of Five Initiatives
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
Our goal to raise the percentage of New Jersey residents who
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Strategic Planning Update
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Presented To: College Planning Council
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 1, 2010
South Seattle Community College
Presented To: College Planning Council
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
Local Goal Setting & SEA Plan Introduction & Overview
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Data
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting
The Equity Framework March 28, 2019.
Share.Shape.Unite. Building our SSU Sonoma State University Academic Senate May 17, 2018 University Budget Office.
Presentation transcript:

Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011 2011 RSCCD “Plan to Plan” Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011

Agenda Review of 2010-2011 vision & goals Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) 12 Measures of Success Progress towards Goals Results of Community/Staff Input, 2010-2011 Goals Recommendations of 2011-2012 Goals

Vision RSCCD is a learning community. The college district and its colleges are committed to ensuring access and equity, and to planning comprehensive educational opportunities throughout our communities. We will be global leaders in many fields, delivering cost-effective, innovative programs and services that are responsive to the diverse needs and interests of all students. We will be exceptionally sensitive and responsive to the economic and educational needs of our students and communities. The environment will be collegial and supportive for students, staff, and the communities we serve. We will promote and extensively participate in partnerships with other educational providers, business, industry, and community groups. We will enhance our communities' cultural, educational, and economic well-being. We will be a leader in the state in student learning outcomes. Students who complete programs will be prepared for success in business, industry, careers, and all future educational endeavors. We will prepare students to embrace and engage the diversity of our global community and to assume leadership roles in their work and public lives.

2010-2011 Goals #1 -- Promote a learning community environment that is innovative, student-centered, and celebrates student achievement. #2 -- Provide access and retention for completion programs, including transfer, vocational, and high school diploma programs; and prepare students for success in their academic, career, and personal life endeavors. #3 – Update and implement facilities master plans, maximize college and community use of facilities, and incorporate “green” efforts into facilities development and other efforts when cost-effective.

2010-2011 Goals, Cont. #4 -- Promote flexible, cost-effective educational programs and services including the use of cutting-edge technology and educational program delivery via technology. #5 -- Pursue alternative public and private funding sources to increase the district’s fiscal sustainability and to implement the district’s vision and goals, and encourage the foundations and district to create plans for capital and program campaigns and alumni association development. #6 -- Maintain a positive, productive working environment for employees, recognizing and embracing diversity and enhancing staff development opportunities that address innovation and technology.

2010-2011 Goals, Cont. #7 -- Expand partnerships with business, labor, community groups, universities, schools, and other public and private agencies in order to enhance the district’s resource development; ensure student access and success; ensure robust economic development programs; and be responsive to workforce development needs and high demand career fields. #8 -- Assess the educational needs of the communities we serve, and enhance awareness of the colleges and community involvement through outreach and advocacy among community constituencies and leaders.

ARCC Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)/AB1417 is the framework that provides for the annual evaluation of community college performance in meeting statewide educational outcome priorities. Required the System Office to develop an accountability report/model Replaced Partnership for Excellence to keep funding in the community college system Legislatively-required annual report—Local trustee review is required

ARCC Colleges are NOT ranked! SAC and SCC should NOT be compared to each other College performance is analyzed over a three-year period AND within selected peer groups Many college activities could impact these measures This is one measure of success, not the only one….staff encourages multiple measures of assessment for continuous improvement

ARCC: College Report Progress and Achievement: Degree/Certificate/Transfer Progress and Achievement Rate Percentage of students earning 30 or more units 1st Fall to 2nd Fall Persistence Rate Progress and Achievement: Workforce Development Annual successful course completion rate for vocational courses Pre-Collegiate Improvement Annual successful course completion rate for basic skills courses ESL Improvement Rate Basic Skills Improvement Rate Career Development and College Preparation (CDCP) Progress and Achievement Rate (Non-Credit) College Profile Peer Grouping College Self-Assessment

ARCC: Progress and Achievement (Degree/Certificate/Transfer) 2001-02 to 2006-07 2002-03 to 2007-08 2003-04 to 2008-09 Peer Group Average Student Progress & Achievement SAC SCC 44.8% 45.0% 45.3% 42.8% 43.3% 39.0% 42.5% 47.9% Percentage of Students Who Earned at Least 30 units 70.1% 56.7% 72.3% 56.2% 69.1% 52.2% 75.0% 68.3% Fall to Fall Student Persistence Fall 05-Fall 06 71.7% 68.8% Fall 06-Fall 07 76.6% 72.4% Fall 08-Fall 09 74.3% 62.9% 72.6% 66.5%

ARCC: Progress and Achievement (Workforce Development) 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 Peer Group Average Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Vocational Courses SAC SCC 88.5% 87.2% 89.6% 90.5% 89.7% 91.3%

ARCC: Progress and Achievement (Basic Skills, ESL/Credit Improvement) 2004-05 to 2006-07 2005-06 to 2007-08 2006-07 to 2008-09 Peer Group Average Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses SAC SCC 62.0% 58.4% 60.5% 61.8% 61.9% 63.8% 65.7% ESL Improvement Rate 52.1% 80.0% 58.9% 76.7% 55.6% 75.0% 48.8% 55.0% Credit Basic Skills Improvement Rate 50.3% 59.6% 49.9% 59.1% 65.0% 50.7% 54.8%

How Do We Evaluate Ourselves? 12 Measures of Success Access Successful course completion Course retention College-level skills attainment Graduation Transfers to four-year universities Student satisfaction Matriculation of continuing education students to credit Vocational technical education core indicators of performance Employee diversity Financial indicators Resource development

Measure 1: Access to Students Feeder High School Graduates Enrolled as New Freshmen

Measure 1: Access to Students Enrollment and Service Area Population

Measure 2: Successful Course Completion Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Measure 3: Course Retention Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Santiago Canyon College Measure 4: College-Level Skill Attainment Successful Completion of English 061/ESL 112 or Higher Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Santiago Canyon College Measure 4: College-Level Skill Attainment Successful Completion of Math 060 or Higher Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Measure 5: Graduates AA/AS Degrees & Certificates Awarded Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Measure 5: Graduates High School Diplomas Awarded SAC School of Continuing Education SCC School of Continuing Education

Measure 6: Transfers to 4-Year Institutions Santa Ana College Santiago Canyon College

Measure 7: Student Satisfaction “The effectiveness of classroom experience is good/excellent” SAC current students 82% graduates 87% SCC current students 78% “The campus environment is good/excellent” SAC current students 80% graduates 88% SCC current students 74% graduates 83%

Measure 7: Student Satisfaction Examples of SAC Core Competencies “Write in an organized & grammatically correct fashion.” Current Students 78% Graduates 83% “Respect & work with people of different cultural backgrounds” Current Students 82% Graduates 94% “Interact with integrity and awareness of others’ opinions/values.” Current Students 81% Graduates 88%

Measure 7: Student Satisfaction Examples of SCC Student Learning Outcomes “Take responsibility for one’s own learning and well-being.” Current Students 78% Graduates 86% “Communicate ideas in a clear and articulate manner.” Current Students 74% Graduates 90% “Critically analyze, evaluate, organize and use quantitative and qualitative data.” Current Students 77% Graduates 87%

Measure 8: Matriculation of Continuing Education Students to Credit Program

Measure 9: Vocational Technical Education Core Indicators of Performance (2007-08 cohort) Students in apprenticeship & vocational courses: SAC SCC CA Successful course completion 91% 97% 88% Earn AA degree, certificate, or credential 85% 34% 82% Persistence and transfer 87% 77% 86% Employment, internship, or military enlistment 88% 93% 82% Participation in training for non-traditional 15% 4% 20% employment Completion of training for non-traditional 18% 17% 22%

Measure 10: Employee Diversity

Measure 11: Financial Indicators

Measure 12: Resource Development Competitive Grant Income District-wide Grants

Measure 12: Resource Development Financial Aid Awarded to Students Awarded by SAC and SCC

Progress Toward 2010-2011 Goals #1 -- Promote a learning community environment that is innovative, student-centered, and celebrates student achievement. #2 -- Provide access and retention for completion programs, including transfer, vocational, and high school diploma programs; and prepare students for success in their academic, career, and personal life endeavors. #3 – Update and implement facilities master plans, maximize college and community use of facilities, and incorporate “green” efforts into facilities development and other efforts when cost-effective.

Progress Toward 2010-2011 Goals #4 -- Promote flexible, cost-effective educational programs and services including the use of cutting-edge technology and educational program delivery via technology. #5 -- Pursue alternative public and private funding sources to increase the district’s fiscal sustainability and to implement the district’s vision and goals, and encourage the foundations and district to create plans for capital and program campaigns and alumni association development. #6 -- Maintain a positive, productive working environment for employees, recognizing and embracing diversity and enhancing staff development opportunities that address innovation and technology.

Progress Toward 2010-2011 Goals #7 -- Expand partnerships with business, labor, community groups, universities, schools, and other public and private agencies in order to enhance the district’s resource development; ensure student access and success; ensure robust economic development programs; and be responsive to workforce development needs and high demand career fields. #8 -- Assess the educational needs of the communities we serve, and enhance awareness of the colleges and community involvement through outreach and advocacy among community constituencies and leaders.

Community/Staff Input 2010-2011 Goals Online survey implemented early January 2011 Members of community include District Citizens’ Advisory Committee, District Bond Oversight Committee, Chambers of Commerce, trade unions, community organizations, college and district foundations, elected officials, city and school districts, RSCCD employees, and student leaders were invited to participate 283 respondents

Community/Staff Input 2010-2011 Goals Goal #1 (promote innovative & student-centered learning environment) and Goal #2 (provide access for completion programs…) received highest level of satisfaction Goal #3 (update of master plans, maximize facilities use, and incorporate green efforts), Goal #4 (promote flexible cost-effective educational programs and services) and Goal #6 (maintain positive and productive work environment received least satisfaction Goal #7 (expand partnerships in the community with business, labor, K-14 and Goal #8 (enhance awareness of the colleges through outreach and advocacy) earned the highest mid-scale ratings (20%).

Community/Staff Input 2010-2011 Goals ranking of importance of goals Goal #1 (promoting learning community environment…) Goal #2 (provide access & retention for completion programs…) Goal #4 (promote flexible, cost-effective educational programs…) Goal #6 (maintain positive, productive working environment…) Goal #5 (pursue alternative funding…) Goal #3 (update/implement facilities master plans…) Goal #8 (assess educational needs of communities…) Goal #7 (expand partnerships with business, community groups…)

Community/Staff Input of 2010-2011 Goals Most frequently expressed comments Reinstate COLA, step and longevity increases for staff Build damaged morale of staff (due to reductions in force, etc.) Remove politics from the classroom and move to a more student-centered climate Increase emphasis on vocational classes Actively pursue green technology

Recommendations of 2011-2012 Goals BOT vision/goals serve as guiding principles for district/colleges staff Staff recommends that BOT maintains current goals for 2011-2012