Request Approval of the Tar-Pamlico Phase IV Agreement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
Advertisements

Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Transitioning the EEP Nutrient Offset Program to an Actual Cost Method James B. Stanfill Ecosystem Enhancement Program October 9, 2008.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
NMC Potential Projects RA Implementation Plan Section IX, Approved RA Plan A.Defining the Basic Roles of the Consortium B.Revisiting the 1998.
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
SCR 22 Task Force on State Educational Technology July 9, 2015.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
Preparing for 2017 RA Update March Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.
Neuse River Basin Provided by Dr. D. Monreau to Dr. G
FALLS LAKE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ( New & Existing Development Requirements) UNRBA BOD Meeting May 18, 2011 John Huisman – NC Division of Water Quality.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Lake Jesup Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) Environmental Protection Division September 1, 2009.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Potomac Round Table Bay TMDL Update 4/1/2011. Schedule Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL March/April/May/June.
Prepared by the Falls and Jordan Lake Watershed Oversight Committees John Huisman - DWQ & Julie Henshaw - DSWC.
John Huisman – NC DWQ NC Water Quality Commission – January 11, 2012 NC Environmental Management Commission – January 12,
Evaluation of a Land Conservation Credit
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Request For Approval of Local Programs Implementing The JORDAN New Development Stormwater Rule & Delegation of Authority to the Director NC Water Quality.
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
Request Approval of the 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Presented by: Bill Kreutzberger Jaime Robinson November 14, 2017
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Neuse & Tar-Pamlico River Basins
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Twelfth Policy Board meeting Lima, Peru 8-9 July 2014
Department of Environmental Quality
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Environmental Management Commission July 13, 2017 Jeff Manning, DWR
Water Quality Credit Trading
May 12, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Tar-Pamlico / Neuse / Falls Lake
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Neuse & Tar-Pamlico River Basins
May 11, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Environmental Management Commission January 10, 2013
Department of Environmental Quality
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Request for Approval to Proceed to EMC Tar-Pamlico Phase IV Agreement
Status Update Tar-Pamlico Phase IV Agreement
Committee Update: Review of Groundwater Standards/IMACs
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Neuse & Tar-Pamlico River Basins
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Regulatory Reform Act (SL ) Periodic review and expiration of existing rules NC Environmental Management Commission March 13, 2014 Jeff Manning.
Department of Environmental Quality
Environmental Management Commission January 2014
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to Johnston County and Delegation of Further Approval Authority.
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
Ellen Lorscheider, Division of Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

Request Approval of the Tar-Pamlico Phase IV Agreement Environmental Management Commission July 9, 2015 John Huisman DWR Nonpoint Source Planning Branch

Agreement Basics Nutrient control Agreement for Tar-Pam point sources Initiated 1990 in response to Tar-Pam NSW designation “Association” of point sources formed Novel cost-effective option to reduce collective discharge Collective annual end of pipe N&P caps based on performance goals: 30% Reduction N No increase in P Relative to 1991 Baseline Association funds Ag Cost Share BMPs if cap exceeded Current Offset Rate $13.15/lb N

Agreement Performance Association remains successfully below caps to date Loads as of 2014 73% of Nitrogen Cap 57% of Phosphorus Cap Agreement part of overall management strategy Initial voluntary NPS strategy adopted in rules effective 2000.

Parties to the Agreement Phase I Parties Association, Division, EMC, DSWC, Enviros Phase IV Parties Association, Division, EMC, DSWC Enviros (PTRF & EDF) declined to sign on to Phase IV Allocation Concerns Evaluation of Progress All parties will continue to remain engaged in process

Tar-Pam Basin Association Members (Phase IV) Belhaven Bunn Enfield Franklin W&S Authority Greenville Utilities Louisburg Oxford Pinetops Robersonville Rocky Mount Scotland Neck Spring Hope Tarboro Warrenton Washington Creedmoor

Phase IV Agreement Phase IV timespan = 10 years May 2015 - May 2025 Big Change: Incorporated individual allocation / limits Response to EPA Group and individual permits Individual limits enforceable if group cap exceeded Also added Creedmoor Joined Association in 2014 Remains serviced by SGWASA (Neuse Basin) Over the course of Phase III DWR met with parties to address refining the Agreement.

Phase IV Agreement Resolved how banked credit can be used Ag BMP banked credits always available as offsets Gage credit used toward just 10% of any offset Established Process to update N and set P rate Based on total actual costs of BMPs Offset rates updated by 2017 Revised Non-Association Recommendations Refers to ongoing rules re-adoption process Over the course of Phase III DWR met with parties to address refining the Agreement.

Phase IV Agreement Evaluation of Progress Section - Advisory Points to Basin Plan “Action Plan” for specifics Rules re-adoption implements some Action Plan items Revised Termination of Agreement Members subject to permit nutrient requirements DWR to evaluate need for point source rulemaking Over the course of Phase III DWR met with parties to address refining the Agreement.

Action Requested Staff requests the approval of the Phase IV Agreement

Questions?