Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health and Safety Executive Ecotoxicology Annex II and III data requirements Mark Clook Chemicals Regulation Directorate Health and Safety Executive UK.
Advertisements

Kemakta Konsult AB Modelling to derive guideline concentrations for organic contaminants in soils Swedish experiences Mark.
Acute Effects Of Single And Mixed Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Associated To Oil Spills On The Copepod Oithona Davisae. Carlos Barata 1, Albert Calbet.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS I. Solid Phase Extraction sorbent configurations – layered phases.
A mass balance model for the fate of PAHs in the San Francisco Estuary Ben K. Greenfield Jay A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute Presented at the.
Better Air Quality 2004 EMISSION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS AND PARTICULATE MATTER FROM DOMESTIC COOKING USING COAL Nghiem Trung Dung Institute.
M. Buzby; J. Tell; L. Ziv; G. Gagliano Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ Philadelphia Section of the American Water Resources Association October.
Front page picture Change picture by marking Picture, right click and choose send to front. Click on the icon in the middle of the picture and locate the.
Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
GMU Chemistry & Biochemistry PCBs and PAHs in the Anacostia River: Sampling, Concentrations and Transport in Gregory D. Foster & Phillip R. McEachern.
FATES-COMARC 1 Riverine transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from Kaoping River (Taiwan) to coastal ocean Chon-Lin Lee 1 *, Bing-Sian Lin 1, and.
Dissolved/dispersed aromatic hydrocarbons in seawater in the area affected by the Prestige oil spill Lucia Viñas, María Ángeles Franco, Demetrio de Armas,
AIIDA V3.0 (AQUATIC IMPACT INDICATOR DATABASE) PRESENTATION & TRAINING.
Kevin Brackney, M.S., P.G. Nez Perce Tribe.  NPT Environmental Response  Historic Spills Clearwater Basin ◦ Impacts from both large and small spills.
Analytical and Relative Potency Factor Approach for Effective Evaluation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Betty Krupka, Scott Kirchner, and Vanessa.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
Introduction to Ecotoxicology Francesca Tencalla Beltox Seminar, Part 6.1.
ASSOCIATIONS OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) WITH SIZE FRACTIONATED SEDIMENT PARTICLES Jejal Reddy Bathi, Geosyntec Consultants, Santa Barbara,
“The Dose makes the Poison”
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS) Katrien Arijs Bram Versonnen Marnix Vangheluwe Jan Mees Ward Vandenberghe.
Nematodes as Bioindicators for Soil Health Assessment Fafeng Li.
MODELKEY ( GOCE) is a research project funded by Prioritisation of potential river basin specific pollutants in four European.
____________________________________ 2015 Summer Institute for Public Health Practice August 3, 2015 Tao Kwan-Gett, UW NWCPHP (host/facilitator) Alberto.
1 Predicting the Chronic Effects of PAHs using the Target Lipid Model of Narcotic Toxicity Joy McGrath Dominic Di Toro HydroQual, Inc. SETAC North America.
Water.europa.eu EQS revision for existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(b) Helen Clayton WFD Team.
Analysis of 18 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons using a Varian 920-LC Analytical HPLC and Pursuit ® 3 PAH Column By Phuong Truong Varian Australia Pty.
Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical,
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
October 2008 CMA on-site 2 17./ Budapest, Hungary.
Criteria for Inherently toxic (iT) in CEPA, UNEP Proposed iT criteria for non-human organisms –aquatic acute effects levels of < 1 mg/L –above 1 mg/L.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
BEAM Bridging Effect Assessment of Mixtures to ecosystem situations and regulation University of Bremen, Germany University of Göteborg, Sweden University.
International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs PRIORITY SUBSTANCES AND EQS’s IN THE PROYECT INCEPTION WORKSHOP Istanbul February -
Transforming Our World: Delivering affordable medicines to anyone, anywhere, any day 1 Environmental hazards of substances Annex 1 – Part 4 of CLP Date:
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
Portable SERS Detector for Simultaneous Detection of Trace-level Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Superfund Sites Wayne Weimer (PI) and Monika Wilson,
Organics analysis in marine sediment and biota
Environmental Effects of Coal Tar-Based Pavement Rejuvenators
Analysis of Low Concentrations of PAH and Alkyl PAH
Recent Development of the PKU-Fuel and PKU-Emission Inventory
Surficial cap water quality assessment
Testing of e-liquids and vapes following latest EU regulations (EU Implementing Decision 2015/2183 and subsequent annexes) Jacek Rajewski PhD Eng Business.
Identification of River Basin Specific Pollutants and Derivation of Environmental Quality Standards under Water Framework Directive: Turkish Experience.
04 – BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 04 – Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX
Omagamre E.W., Okuo, J.M., Oseji O.F and Ibhafidon, S.O
Analysis of combustion byproducts on firefighter protection equipment and in firefighter urine using novel high resolution GC/Q-TOF and bioassay Christiane.
Acute Effects Of Single And Mixed Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Associated To Oil Spills On The Copepod Oithona Davisae . Carlos Barata1, Albert Calbet.
Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC)
Information Sources Day 1.
Dedicated maps on contaminants
Table of existing standard methods and proposed quality standards for priority substances in water AMPS (2) Jan Wollgast.
Nickel Risk Assessment
Essential data for a complete dossier
Paul Whitehouse Environment Agency, UK
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
Paul Whitehouse Chair, EG-EQS
Role of Higher Tier Data in the Derivation of the Ni EQS
Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Programme INTERREG III : STARDUST
Sediment & biota standards Monitoring for prioritisation & emerging pollutants National EQSs for specific substances.
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Jos van Gils, Elena Semenzin, Muriel Gevrey, Peter Von der Ohe,
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
7th Expert Advisory Forum on Priority Substances June 2004 Article 16 on priority substances under the Water Framework Directive.
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs on the basis of internal lipid concentrations 16 September 2010

History of EQSs derivation for PAHs 1995: DF Kalf, GH Crommentuijn, R Posthumus, EJ van de Plassche RIVM report 679101018 10 PAHs Water, soil and sediment (Very) limited amount of data 2005: European Union, Fact sheets priority substances Water Framework Directive Naphtalene, Anthracene, Fluoranthene and 5 PAHs (5-6 rings) Water and sediment More data, in part based on early version of EU RAR 2008: European Union, (draft) final Risk Assessment Report 16 PAHs Lot of data Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

This study Performed for both generic quality standards and soil clean-up framework Based on but not limited to EU RAR Soil clean up framework requires more protection levels E.g. HC20, HC50, median values This requires thorough evaluation of all data More than 270 references All thoroughly evaluated Klimisch code assigned Analytical verification Solubility issues Realistic (representative) conditions Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Valid acute aquatic toxicity data Huge range of EC50s Strong correlation with hydrophobicity Phototoxicity apparent for anthracene, pyrene, and fluoranthene (no valid data chrysene) 100000 LC50 or EC50 [µg/L] 0.01 3 4 5 6 7 log K ow Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Valid chronic aquatic toxicity data Huge range of NOECs and EC10s Strong correlation with hydrophobicity Phototoxicity has little influence 100000 NOEC or EC10 [µg/L] 0.01 3 4 5 6 7 log K ow Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Valid chronic terrestrial toxicity data Much smaller range of NOECs and EC10s No correlation with hydrophobicity 100000 NOEC or EC10 [µg/kg dw] 3 4 5 6 7 log K ow Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Valid chronic benthic toxicity data Similar to soil Few data (five PAHs) 3 4 5 6 7 log K ow Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Interim conclusions Many data Toxicity hydrophobicity dependent Assumptions Similar mode of toxic action Joint action Accumulation driven by hydrophobicity Derive EQSs for PAHs similar to TPH (Verbruggen et al 2008) Recalculate all toxicity data to internal residues Organic carbon – water partition coefficients for soil and sediment Membrane lipids – water partition coefficients for all compartments Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

SSD for PAHs based on internal residues Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Conclusions Toxicity of PAHs can be modelled by membrane - water partitioning From scientific point of view: Measure free dissolved concentrations to reduce uncertainties in bioavailability Toxicity of PAHs is very comparable to TPH Mode of toxic action probably is narcosis Nevertheless, QS from experimental data << QSAR based QS Joint toxicity Same mode of action, apply concentration addition Toxic Unit approach Secondary poisoning, human fish consumption not included yet Issue with bioconcentration factor (fish versus mussels) Carcinogenicity Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010

Comparison with WFD fact sheets Substance EQS this study HC5 with AF 5 WFD fact sheets Naphthalene 6.0 2.4 Acenaphthylene 4.5 Acenaphthene 2.0 Fluorene 1.2 Phenanthrene 0.66 Anthracene 0.45 0.11 Pyrene 0.28 Fluoranthene 0.17 0.1 Chrysene 0.062 Benz[a]anthracene 0.054 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.046 0.03 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.045 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.05 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.044 0.002 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.031 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.029 Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs | 16 September 2010