by Kanchan Anand, John Ziebuhr, Parvesh Wadhwani, Jeroen R

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
3-Dimensional structure of membrane-bound coagulation factor VIII: modeling of the factor VIII heterodimer within a 3-dimensional density map derived by.
Conservation of Structure and Mechanism between Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I and Site-Specific Recombinases  Chonghui Cheng, Paul Kussie, Nikola Pavletich,
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase–Holliday Junction Complex
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
The 1.8 Å crystal structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygenase reveals a novel hydrophobic helical zipper as a subunit linker  Matthew W Vetting, Douglas H Ohlendorf 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
The 1.5 Å Crystal Structure of a Prokaryote Serpin
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
A Duplicated Fold Is the Structural Basis for Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Catalytic Activity, Processivity, and Regulation  Martyn F. Symmons, George.
by Jian Lei, Guido Hansen, Christoph Nitsche, Christian D
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Coronavirus Main Proteinase (3CLpro) Structure: Basis for Design of Anti-SARS Drugs by Kanchan Anand, John Ziebuhr, Parvesh Wadhwani, Jeroen R. Mesters, and Rolf Hilgenfeld Science Volume 300(5626):1763-1767 June 13, 2003 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1. 3D structure of coronavirus Mpro. 3D structure of coronavirus Mpro. (A) Monomer of HCoV Mpro. Domains I (top), II, and III (bottom) are indicated. Helices are red and strands are green. α helices are labeled A to F according to occurence along the primary structure, with the additional one-turn A′ α helix in the N-terminal segment (residues 11 to 14). β strands are labeled a to f, followed by an indication of the domain to which they belong (I or II). The N and C termini are labeled N and C, respectively. Residues of the catalytic dyad, Cys144 and His41, are indicated. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment of the main proteinases of coronaviruses from all three groups. HCoV, human coronavirus 229E (group I); TGEV, porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (group I); MHV, mouse hepatitis virus (group II); BCoV, bovine coronavirus (group II); SARS-CoV, SARS coronavirus (between groups II and III); IBV, avian infectious bronchitis virus (group III). The autocleavage sites of the proteinases are marked by vertical arrows above the sequences. In addition to the sequences of the mature enzymes, four residues each of the viral polyprotein N-terminal to the first and C-terminal to the second autocleavage site are shown. Note the conservation of the cleavage pattern, (small)-Xaa-Leu-Gln↓(Ala,Ser,Gly). Thick bars above the sequences indicate α helices (labeled A′ and A to F); horizontal arrows indicate β strands (labeled a to f, followed by the domain to which they belong). Residue numbers for HCoV Mpro are given below the sequence; three-digit numbers are centered about the residue labeled. Symbols in the second row below the alignment mark residues involved in dimerization of HCoV and TGEV Mpro: open circle (o) indicates only main chain involved; asterisk (*) indicates only side chain involved; plus (+) indicates both main chain and side chain involved. From the almost absolute conservation of side chains involved in dimerization, it can be concluded that SARS-CoV Mpro also has the capacity to formdimers. In addition, side chains involved in inhibitor binding in the TGEV Mpro complex are indicated by triangles (Δ), and catalytic-site residues Cys144 and His41 as well as the conserved Y160MH162 motif are shaded. (C) Cα plot of a monomer of SARS-CoV Mpro as model-built on the basis of the crystal structures of HCoV 229E Mpro and TGEV Mpro. Residues identical in HCoV Mpro and SARS-CoV Mpro are indicated in red. Kanchan Anand et al. Science 2003;300:1763-1767 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2. Dimer of HCoV Mpro. Dimer of HCoV Mpro. The N-terminal residues of each chain squeeze between domains II and III of the parent monomer and domain II of the other monomer. N and C termini are labeled by cyan and magenta spheres and the letters N and C, respectively. Kanchan Anand et al. Science 2003;300:1763-1767 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3. (A) Refined model of the TGEV Mpro-bound hexapeptidyl CMK inhibitor built into electron density (2∥Fo| – |Fc∥, contoured at 1σ above the mean). (A) Refined model of the TGEV Mpro-bound hexapeptidyl CMK inhibitor built into electron density (2∥Fo| – |Fc∥, contoured at 1σ above the mean). There was no density for the Cbz group or for the Cβ atomof the P1 Gln. Inhibitor is shown in red, protein in gray. Cys144 is yellow. (B) Inhibitors will bind to different coronavirus Mpros in an identical manner. A superimposition (stereo image) of the substrate-binding regions of the free enzymes of HCoV Mpro (blue) and SARS-CoV Mpro (gray) and of TGEV Mpro (green) in complex with the hexapeptidyl CMK inhibitor (red) is shown. The covalent bond between the inhibitor and Cys144 of TGEV Mpro is in purple. Kanchan Anand et al. Science 2003;300:1763-1767 Published by AAAS

Fig. 4. Derivatives of the antirhinoviral drug AG7088 should inhibit coronavirus Mpros. Derivatives of the antirhinoviral drug AG7088 should inhibit coronavirus Mpros. A superimposition (stereo image) of the substrate-binding regions of TGEV Mpro (marine) in complex with the hexapeptidyl CMK inhibitor (red) and HRV2 3Cpro (green) in complex with the inhibitor AG7088 (yellow) is shown. Kanchan Anand et al. Science 2003;300:1763-1767 Published by AAAS

Scheme 1. Kanchan Anand et al. Science 2003;300:1763-1767 Published by AAAS