Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part I - Cloning In General.
Advertisements

Plasmid Isolation Prepared by Latifa Aljebali Office: Building 5, 3 rd floor, 5T250.
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY IN ACTION In this project, students will use what they have learned in the previous courses to complete a larger multi-step molecular.
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
E.Coli AS MODERN VECTOR.
Cloning DNA Sequences that Encode Eukaryotic Protein
Karyn Goudie Belanger, Kenneth N Kreuzer  Molecular Cell 
Molecular Biology Working with DNA.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
Self-Excising Retroviral Vectors Encoding the Cre Recombinase Overcome Cre- Mediated Cellular Toxicity  Daniel P. Silver, David M. Livingston  Molecular.
The Ordered Transcription of RNA Domains Is Not Essential for Ribosome Biogenesis in Escherichia coli  Kei Kitahara, Tsutomu Suzuki  Molecular Cell  Volume.
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Robert E. White, Richard Wade-Martins, Michael R. James 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Transcriptional activation of transforming growth factor-β1 in mesangial cell culture by high glucose concentration  Brenda B. Hoffman, Kumar Sharma,
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Karyn Goudie Belanger, Kenneth N Kreuzer  Molecular Cell 
Molecular Biology Working with DNA.
Regulation of the Pap Epigenetic Switch by CpxAR
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2001)
Takehiro Yasukawa, Ming-Yao Yang, Howard T. Jacobs, Ian J. Holt 
White-Opaque Switching in Candida albicans Is Controlled by Mating-Type Locus Homeodomain Proteins and Allows Efficient Mating  Mathew G. Miller, Alexander.
Shiela E. Unkles, Vito Valiante, Derek J. Mattern, Axel A. Brakhage 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin  R.F Kalejta, X Li, L.D Mesner,
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
RNA-Independent DNA Cleavage Activities of Cas9 and Cas12a
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Induction of Large DNA Palindrome Formation in Yeast: Implications for Gene Amplification and Genome Stability in Eukaryotes  David K Butler, Lauren E.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (August 2015)
CTG Repeats Show Bimodal Amplification in E. coli
Jérôme Wuarin, Vicky Buck, Paul Nurse, Jonathan B.A. Millar  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Ruth Halaban, Elaine Cheng  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Rapid and Selective Remodeling of a Positioned Nucleosome during the Induction of IL- 12 p40 Transcription  Amy S Weinmann, Scott E Plevy, Stephen T Smale 
Compound Heterozygosity for Novel Splice Site Mutations in the BPAG2/COL17A1 Gene Underlies Generalized Atrophic Benign Epidermolysis Bullosa  Leena Pulkkinen,
Maturation Pathways for E
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
E.Coli AS MODERN VECTOR.
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Presentation transcript:

Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages 945-955 (June 2001) Change of Plasmid DNA Structure, Hypermethylation, and Lon-Proteolysis as Steps in a Replicative Cascade  Renata Maas  Cell  Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages 945-955 (June 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0

Figure 1 The Replicon RepFIC Map of the replicon region is drawn to scale. Horizontal arrow indicates the direction of replication and of transcription-translation. Gray rectangles represent all expressed polypeptides. Coupled translation via a cysteine-methionine frameshift is enlarged for detail and shown below the map. The gray vertical arrows indicate unique replicon GATC (dam) sites, and the clear vertical arrow indicates a unique SalI site that was used to demonstrate blockage of restriction by processive methylation (see text). The left-most GATC site is located 10 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the −35 PABC promoter sequence. The middle GATC site is located 14 nt downstream of the −10 PABC promoter sequence. The right-most dam site is located 2 nt downstream of the −10 PA promoter sequence. Abbreviations used: RBS, ribosomal binding site; ORF, open reading frame; and ssr, start site of replication Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 2 Plasmid Maintenance at Low Helical Density (A) Electrophoretic mobility of scL (low helical density) and scH (high helical density) RepFIC. Lane 1, plasmid prepared from a normal C600 stock grown overnight with methylation care package (see Experimental Procedures). Lane 2, plasmid prepared from a transformant after cysteine-enhanced selection. Lane 3, transformant used in lane 2 was successively inoculated into fresh medium 6 times. Lane 4, plasmid prepared from a transformant in a lon host. Lane 5, transformant used in lane 4 was successively inoculated into fresh medium 6 times. (B) Information transfer in plasmid transformation by cotransmitted protein and by the DNA conformation. Lanes 1–4, plasmid preparations from single colony isolates transformed with salt-stripped scL DNA as shown in lane 7. Lane 5, preparation of RepFIC miniplasmid from an exponentially gowing culture. Lane 6, same plasmid preparation was salt stripped. Lanes 7–10, plasmid preparations from single colony isolates transformed with DNA as shown in (A), lane 1, under conditions as specified in The Efficiency of Transformation section Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 3 Plasmid DNA from Normal C600 Hosts (A), and C600 Hosts Containing scL Plasmid Exclusively (B) DNA was spread for electron microscopy from droplets by the cytochromeC method Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 4 Differences in Methylation as Demonstrated by Enzymatic Restriction and Chemical Treatment of scH and scL DNA, Respectively (A) Lanes 1, 2, and 3, scH DNA treated respectively as follows: untreated, MboI, and DpnI. Lanes 4, 5, and 6, scL DNA treated respectively as follows: untreated, MboI, and DpnI. Lane 7, molecular weight markers. (B) Lanes 1, 2, and 3, scH DNA treated respectively as follows: untreated, DpnI, and DpnII. Lanes 4, 5 and 6: scL DNA treated as follows: untreated, DpnI, and DpnII. Lane 7, molecular weight markers. (C) Restriction of scL DNA isolated from a lon strain, a dcm strain, and a dam strain with DpnI. Lane 1, mostly scH DNA isolated from a dcm strain (marker); lane 2, scL DNA from a lon host; lane 3, lane 2 DNA restricted with DpnI; lane 4, mostly scL DNA from a dcm host; lane 5, lane 4 DNA restricted with DpnI; lane 6, mostly scL DNA from a dam host; lane 7, lane 6 DNA treated with DpnI. (D) scH and scL DNAs from a dam host were methylated with dam-methyltransferase in vitro. Lanes 1 and 4, undigested; lanes 2 and 5, restricted with DpnI. Lane 3, restricted with MboI. (E) The susceptibility to degradation by piperidine of scL DNA isolated from a lon host (lane 1) and a mixture of scL and scH DNA isolated from a dcm host (lane 5). Piperidine treatment was as follows: lanes 1 and 5, none; lanes 2 and 6, 7 minutes; lanes 3 and 7, 15 minutes; lanes 4 and 8, 30 minutes, with all piperidine treatments carried out at 86°C. Abbreviations used: L, scL; H, scH; 2.5, 2.5 kb linear DNA; U, untreated; M, MboI; D, DpnI; and II, DpnII Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 5 Methylation Patterns and Supercoiling of a Plasmid during Growth (A) Strains containing the RepFIC miniplasmid were grown overnight in LB broth medium supplemented with 0.8% glycerol, homocysteine, and ferrous sulfate. Lanes 1 and 2, plasmid was nonimprinted. Lanes 3 and 4, plasmid was isolated from a lon host and imprinted. Lanes 5 and 6, plasmid was imprinted (scL) at the time of inoculation. Even numbered lanes, media additionally supplemented with 10 mM phosphate salts. (B) DNA as isolated from a lon host grown to stationary phase with homocysteine in lane 1, homocysteine and ferrous sulfate in lane 2, homocysteine and magnesium sulfate in lane 3, and no supplements in lane 4. Glycerol was used as a carbon source in all cases. (C) Plasmid was isolated from cultures in log-phase (#1), stationary phase (#2), and after overnight incubation (#3), then digested with DpnI. Left lanes, undigested; right lanes, DpnI treated. Molecular weight markers in right lane were III (Roche Diagnostics, 0.12–21.2 kbp). (D) Plasmid preparations 1, 2, and 3, DpnI treated and electrophoresed in 4% agarose. Molecular weight markers were V (Roche Diagnostics, 8-587 bp). Numbers on the right indicate approximate size in bp of bands that do not correspond to bands from the drug marker Ω in the plasmid. Numbers on the left indicate sizes of bands that correspond to GATC restriction fragments of Ω Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 6 Effects of RepA on Plasmid Helical Density Plasmid preparations from the strain N99cI857 as host, which permits induction of RepA, cloned under the control of a thermosensitive PL promoter. All cultures were harvested during early exponential growth at 37°C, at the same optical density. The plasmid samples are equal in volume and represent the same number of optical density units. Lane 1, RepA expression vector plasmid in a low helical density conformation. Lane 2, RepFIC miniplasmid, mostly at scH helical density. Lane 3, plasmid preparation from the same host containing both the RepA expression vector and RepFIC miniplasmid Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)

Figure 7 The Plasmid Replication Cascade Abbreviations used: Cdnm, processive methylation of accessible nucleotides in DNA; Dam, N6 adenine methylation of GATC sequences. Sc nomenclature: scH, sc B-DNA; scL, low-linking-number sc DNA, and see text. The products of steps III and IV, outlined in gray, are presumably hemimethylated at GATC sequences and have not been identified Cell 2001 105, 945-955DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00402-0)