Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 and 14. Error  Type 1: False positive. The effect was not really present, but our statistics lead us to believe that it is.  Type 2: False.
Advertisements

Differential Expression Analysis Introduction to Systems Biology Course Chris Plaisier Institute for Systems Biology.
From the homework: Distribution of DNA fragments generated by Micrococcal nuclease digestion mean(nucs) = bp median(nucs) = 110 bp sd(nucs+ = 17.3.
Biostatistics in biology. Why we use biostatistics in biology.
Differentially expressed genes
Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data
GCB/CIS 535 Microarray Topics John Tobias November 8th, 2004.
13-1 Designing Engineering Experiments Every experiment involves a sequence of activities: Conjecture – the original hypothesis that motivates the.
Differential Gene Expression Dennis Kostka, Christine Steinhoff Slides adapted from Rainer Spang.
Tom Kepler Santa Fe Institute Normalization and Analysis of DNA Microarray Data by Self-Consistency and Local Regression
Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data By H. Bjørn Nielsen.
Comp. Genomics Recitation 10 4/7/09 Differential expression detection.
Multiplication Facts. 9 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 9 = 45 9 x 6 = 54.
BIOSTATISTICS Hypotheses testing and parameter estimation.
Distinguishing active from non active genes: Main principle: DNA hybridization -DNA hybridizes due to base pairing using H-bonds -A/T and C/G and A/U possible.
Multiplication Facts. 2x2 4 8x2 16 4x2 8 3x3.
Multiplication Facts Review: x 1 = 1 10 x 8 =
Micro array Data Analysis. Differential Gene Expression Analysis The Experiment Micro-array experiment measures gene expression in Rats (>5000 genes).
Multiplication Facts All Facts. 0 x 1 2 x 1 10 x 5.
Complex 1 Complex 2 Complex 3
Multiplication Facts.
Differential Gene Expression
Functional Genomics in Evolutionary Research
Multiplication Facts.
Mixture Modeling of the Distribution of p-values from t-tests
Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM)
Basic Estimation Techniques
Setting significance levels at the correct level
Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
More About ANOVA BPS 7e Chapter 30 © 2015 W. H. Freeman and Company.
Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains
HIS-24 regulates expression of infection-inducible genes.
Significance Table from Anova Test
WT Segregant * Ds * * Figure S1. Fatty acid methyl esters of seed triacylglycerols for a wild-type segregant (WT Segregant) and transposon-tagged line.
Intestinal microbiota in infants at high risk for allergy: Effects of prebiotics and role in eczema development  Harm Wopereis, BSc, Kathleen Sim, MRCPCH,
Week 11 Assignment Figures
Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM)
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
One Way ANOVAs One Way ANOVAs
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
Multiplication Facts.
Genome-wide expression screen identifies novel hypoxia-regulated genes
Growth characteristics of strain 22A and its MDH mutant derivatives.
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Varying Intolerance of Gene Pathways to Mutational Classes Explain Genetic Convergence across Neuropsychiatric Disorders  Shahar Shohat, Eyal Ben-David,
(A) T2DM: serum glucose levels during glucose tolerance test (n=6 per group). (A) T2DM: serum glucose levels during glucose tolerance test (n=6 per group).
 ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <
Log- to stationary-phase growth results in differential acetyl abundance on specific proteins. Log- to stationary-phase growth results in differential.
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Relative growth of WT R2866 and the R2866ΔampG gene deletion mutant with Triton X-100. Relative growth of WT R2866 and the R2866ΔampG gene deletion mutant.
Published in Thyroid. January 2014, 24(1): DOI: /thy
Thermomorphogenesis in seedling organs is autonomous or interdependent
Distribution plot of the differentially expressed genes.
Growth, adhesion, biofilm formation, and aggregation of WT R2866 and the R2866ΔampG gene deletion mutant. Growth, adhesion, biofilm formation, and aggregation.
Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected
Arginine-to-lysine mutations conferring TRIM22 restriction and lysine-to-arginine mutations causing loss of TRIM22 restriction. Arginine-to-lysine mutations.
(A) Western blot probing nuclear extract from wild-type (wt) and the newly generated ACF1 mutant (AcfC) embryos (0–16 h). (A) Western blot probing nuclear.
Fig. 3. Parp mutation rescues mitochondrial function in pink1 mutants.
Overexpression of IL-27 upregulates expression of multiple IR by T cells in vivo. Overexpression of IL-27 upregulates expression of multiple IR by T cells.
Chitin‐induced callose deposition in the mapkkk5 mutants
Loyola Marymount University
Fig. 1 A time-course RNA-seq analysis reveals prominent IRF8 expression in the spinal cord during the recovery phase after SCI. A time-course RNA-seq analysis.
Partial alteration of the Treg gene signature by the p.A384T mutation.
DNase and proteinase K treatment of WT R2866 and R2866ΔampG gene deletion mutant biofilms. DNase and proteinase K treatment of WT R2866 and R2866ΔampG.
Conidiation morphology of QM 6a and the pks4 deletion mutants.
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Presentation transcript:

Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data by Hanne Jarmer

Induction of adherence by sub-lethal alcohol concentrations

Microarray experiments on: Induced adherence - Listeria monocytogenes adheres better at sub-lethal alcohol concentrations Microarray experiments on: 1. Wild type +/- alcohol 2. Mutant +/- alcohol 4 biological replicates of each

The microarray data (wild type)

The microarray data (mutant)

Why and what do we test? - We test to extract significant genes Intensity Density Fold change: > 2 Fold change: ~1

The t-test The t statistic is based on the sample mean and variance t

The P-value Definition: The possibility of getting the observed difference by coincidence

Correction for multiple testing Each time we test, there is a certain possibility, that the observed difference is in fact a coincidence when H0 is TRUE Unacceptable many false positives

Correction for multiple testing Bonferroni: P ≤ 0.01 N Confidence level of 99% Benjamini-Hochberg: P ≤ i N 0.01 N = number of genes i = number of accepted genes

Volcano plot P-value log2 fold change (M)

1 The 2 way ANOVA Interaction 2 3 wildtype +alcohol mutant +alcohol

What would be significant? Intensity 1. +/- alcohol wt alcohol both mutant 2. +/- mutation wt alcohol both mutant 3. +/- both wt alcohol both mutant

Acknowledgements Anne Lise Gravesen, KVL Growth experiments Torsten Hain, Institut für Medizinsiche Mikrobiologie Microarray experiments

Correction for multiple testing Bonferroni: P ≤ 0.01 N Confidence level of 99% Benjamini-Hochberg: P ≤ i N 0.01 N = number of genes i = number of accepted genes