Discussion agenda Summary & proposals (30 min)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Update on progress in SOE-drafting group. 2 Water Directors Steering of implementation process Chair: Presidency, Co-chair: Commission Strategic Co-ordination.
Advertisements

WISE concept Reporting Guidance state of play EIONET Workshop Copenhagen, 12 October 2005 Jorge RODRIGUEZ ROMERO DG Environment.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
1 The WISE implementation plan and WISE development support by the Technical Group Stefan Jensen WISE GIS workshop Brussels.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
IC network selection process
New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006
Daughter Groundwater Directive
WG 2A Ecological Status Drafting group: Guidance on the process of the intercalibration excercise 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03.
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Improving assessment of GES Draft conclusions and Way forward
Water reuse CIS working group PoM 15 October 2015 Thomas Petitguyot
Intercalibration Report on State - of - play and way forward Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute for Environment.
Draft Commission Decision on Intercalibration
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Ana Cristina Cardoso & Mark Dowell
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Water Directors’ Meeting Common Implementation Strategy
WG ECOSTAT: Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
WG 2.5 Intercalibration.
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Introduction & objectives Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute.
Progress SOE –drafting group
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
New mandates for Working Groups A, C and D including GIS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
WG GES: Decision review progress
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
Main Action Points DG Env to circulate list of members of WG F
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
WG Integrated Testing in Pilot River Basins
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River groups with extension
Agenda item 2.1 – Overall Progress Report
Metadata analysis.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Progress SOE –drafting group
Status of the Nutrient Best Practice Guide
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Standardisation/Harmonisation
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Common Implementation Strategy for the
Common Implementation Strategy for the
WFD CIS WG ECOSTAT meeting on 8-9 October 2007 Objectives What do we need to achieve during this meeting?
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Discussion agenda Summary & proposals (30 min) Specific comments on Draft guidance (30 min) Next steps (timetable) Other information

Organizational aspects of Intercalibration 1) Establish quickly expert drafting groups for different water categories (3). Proposals? 2) 2-5 experts to draft the first criteria for selection (preferably from CIS WGs, but ...). 3) JRC will facilitate & lead drafting groups 4) Drafts reviewed by WG intercalibration 5) Information from other WGs and outside CIS working groups should be included.

Selection of Types The approach of WRc for grouping rivers into core types was supported. Should be expanded for other quality elements, categories, and all MS included all important pressures should be covered as many types as possible, but allowing sufficient/high number of sites prepare common paper on HMWB & intercalibration with WG 2.2.

Selection of sites A range of sites from high to moderate should be examined to set the borders use physical chemical data & critical loading models (for lakes) to identify range of potential IC sites number of sites should be higher than 2 (existing recommendation 5, or even more if possible) all biological quality elements should be included, and to cover range of pressures

Comments on draft guidance OPEN DISCUSSION

REVISED Timetable CANCELLED R Preparatory phase Working phase Workshop Report Approval WFD IC exercise

Timetable & tasks for 2002

Other information Guidance on guidance documents, Please, send comments concerning proposal by DG env. to Anna-Stiina More detailed comments of draft document will be uploaded to CIRCA Need for a newsgroup in CIRCA? Draft Minutes of meeting 24/12