Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Eva Decotto, Allan C. Spradling  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Phf7 Controls Male Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Germline Stem Cell Heterogeneity Supports Homeostasis in Drosophila
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Todd Nystul, Allan Spradling  Cell Stem Cell 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
miR-184 Has Multiple Roles in Drosophila Female Germline Development
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Intrinsic role of Aub in GSC self‐renewal and differentiation
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Nicola Iovino, Filippo Ciabrelli, Giacomo Cavalli  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
A Dynamic Molecular Link between the Telomere Length Regulator TRF1 and the Chromosome End Protector TRF2  Benjamin R. Houghtaling, Leanora Cuttonaro,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
RLE-1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Regulates C
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang 
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Lar function is not required for Stat92E accumulation in GSCs
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Yb Modulates the Divisions of Both Germline and Somatic Stem Cells through piwi- and hh-Mediated Mechanisms in the Drosophila Ovary  F.James King, Akos.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 494-506 (April 2008) Otefin, a Nuclear Membrane Protein, Determines the Fate of Germline Stem Cells in Drosophila via Interaction with Smad Complexes  Xiaoyong Jiang, Laixin Xia, Dongsheng Chen, Yingyue Yang, Haidong Huang, Lele Yang, Qiudong Zhao, Lijun Shen, Jun Wang, Dahua Chen  Developmental Cell  Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 494-506 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of ote Mutants with Defects in Germ Cell Development (A) (Aa) A schematic diagram of germarium with different cell types labeled with different colors: germline stem cells (GSCs) (blue), cystoblast cells (CB) and cysts (green), terminal filament (TF) (gray), cap cells (CPC) (deep green), and fusomes and germ-cell-specific organelles (red). Ovaries from wild-type w1118 (Ab), oteEMS (Ac–Ae), and oteEMS; P{oteP-ote} (Af) 3-day-old female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. Anti-Hts was used to outline germarium and the morphology of fusomes, while anti-Vasa was used to visualize all germ cells in the germarium and egg chambers. GSCs were identified as germ cells with anterior-positioned fusomes (arrows). (B) Ovaries from wild-type w1118 (Ba), oteEMS (Bb), and oteEMS/oteB279 (Bc) 3-day-old female flies were stained wtih anti-Ote (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. In wild-type germarium (Ba), Ote is specifically expressed in the nuclear membrane of both germ cells and somatic cells, while in ote mutant germaria (Bb and Bc), no specific expression was observed. In (Bd), ovaries from an ote mutant bearing a transgene P{oteP-flag:ote} were stained with anti-Vasa (green), anti-Flag antibodies (red), and Hoechst (blue). The scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Western blot shows that Ote protein was present in wild-type (lane1) and oteEMS; P{oteP-ote} (lane 4) flies, but was undetectable in both oteEMS (lane 2) and oteB279 (lane 3) mutant files. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ote Is Required Intrinsically for GSC Maintenance (A) GSC clones were induced by heat-shock treatment in adult female flies. Ovaries from FRT control flies (Aa and Ab) and FRT, ote flies (Ac and Ad) were dissected at day 2 and day 14 following heat-shock treatment; GSC clones (indicated by arrowheads) and cyst clones (indicated by arrows) were identified by the lack of GFP expression. (B) Ovaries from oteEMS mutant (Ba), oteEMS; tubP-gal4/uasp-ote (Bb), and oteEMS; nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-ote (Bc) female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Percentage of negatively GFP-marked GSC clones in FRT control and two FRT, ote null alleles at days 2, 6, 10, 14 and 18. In contrast with wild-type-marked control GSCs (GFP−), the percentage of marked GSCs (GFP−) that lacked ote was dramatically reduced. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ote Functions as an Agonist of dpp Pathway in the Regulation of Bam Silencing (A) Ovaries from wild-type w1118 (Aa) and P{nosP-ote} (Ab) female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. GSC/CBs and GSC-like cells containing spectrosomes are indicated by arrows. (B) Ovaries from nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-tkv[ca] (Ba), ote/+; nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-tkv[ca] (Bb and Be), and ote; nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-tkv[ca] (Bf) female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. GSC/CBs and GSC-like cells were identified as germ cells containing spectrosomes; differentiated cysts were recognized by branched fusomes (indicated by arrows). Egg chambers are indicated by bracket markers (Be). Ovaries from nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-tkv[ca] (Bc) and ote/+; nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-tkv[ca] (Bd) female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Bam-C (red) antibodies. Germ cells with Bam-C expression are indicated by arrows. (C) Ovaries from nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-dad (Ca) and nosP-ote; nosP-gal4:vp16/uasp-dad (Cb) female flies were stained with anti-Vasa (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. The scale bar represents 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ote Is Necessary and Sufficient for Silencing in GSC/GSC-like Cells Ovaries from bamP-gfp (A), ote; bamP-gfp (B), and nosP-ote; bamP-gfp (C) female flies were stained with anti-GFP (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. (A) shows that two wild-type GSCs were GFP negative (indicated by arrows); (B) shows that two GSC in an ote mutant background were GFP positive (indicated by arrows); (C) shows that at least seven spectrosome-containing germ cells were GFP negative. The scale bar represents 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nuclear Membrane Targeting Is Essential for Ote Function (A) Ovaries from P{oteP-gfp:ote} (Aa) and P{oteP-gfp:ote-ΔTM} (Ab) female flies were stained by anti-GFP (green) and anti-Hts (red) antibodies. Germ cells with nuclear membrane-targeting GFP expression and exclusive GFP expression in the nucleoplasm are indicated by an arrow and an arrowhead, respectively. (B) Schematic diagram of Ote constructs with full-length Ote (Ba), truncated Ote lacking TM (Bb), Ote TM replaced by TKV-TM (amino acids 192–214) (Bc), Ote TM replaced by Emerin TM (amino acids 225–247) (Bd), and Ote lacking the LEM domain (Be) used for tests of rescue and nuclear membrane targeting activities. Ote mutant ovaries (Ba′–Be′) containing corresponding constructs (Ba–Be) were stained with anti-Ote (green) and anti-Hts (red). Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ote Interacts with Medea, a Component of Smad Complexes (A) Western blot assays were performed to analyze the expression of Ote in S2 cells; the presence of Ote was indicated. (B) S2 cells were transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Med (full-length); 48 hours after transfection, lysates from transfected S2 cells were immunoprecipitated with Ote antibody or preserum (IgG only). Western blots were performed to analyze the presence of Myc epitope-tagged Medea as indicated. The results showed that Med specifically associated with Ote. (C) S2 cells were transfected with Flag epitope-tagged Med (full-length); 48 hours after transfection, lysates from nontransfected S2 cells (control) and transfected S2 cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel. Western blots were performed to analyze the presence of Ote protein as indicated. The results showed that Ote specifically associated with Med. (D) S2 cells were transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Mad (full-length); 48 hours after transfection, lysates from transfected S2 cells were immunoprecipitated with Ote antibody or preserum (IgG only). Western blots were performed to analyze the presence of Myc epitope-tagged Mad as indicated. (E and F) Schematic drawings of Ote (E) and Med (F) and their deletion mutants correspond to (G)–(J). (G and H) S2 cells were transfected with different combinations of constructs as indicated; 48 hours after transfection, lysates from transfected S2 cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel. Western blots were performed to analyze the presence of Flag or Myc epitope-tagged protein as indicated. The results showed that the LEM domain and the region aa 271–400 are important for Ote specifically associated with Med. (I and J) S2 cells were transfected with different combinations of constructs (as indicated) to determine the important domain for Med interaction with Ote; 48 hours after transfection, lysates from transfected S2 cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel. Western blots were performed to analyze the presence of Flag or Myc epitope-tagged protein as indicated. The results showed that the linker domain is important for Med specifically associated with Ote. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Med Colocalizes with Ote at the Nuclear Membrane and Is Essential for the Association of Ote with the bam Silencer Element (A) S2 cells were transfected with Myc:Med (full-length); 48 hours after transfection, transfected S2 cells were stained with Ote antibody (green) and Myc antibodies (red). Colocalization of Ote and Myc:Med is indicated by an arrow. (B) S2 cells transfected with Flag:Med were analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation with Flag antibody, Ote antibody, and preserum (IgG only), respectively. PCR (23 cycles) was performed by using bam promoter-specific primers (Experimental Procedures and Supplemental Data). The specific bands containing bamSE (bam silencer element) are indicated by an arrow. (C) S2 cells were treated with dsRNA of medea and analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation with Ote antibody and preserum (IgG only), respectively. PCR (30 cycles) was performed to analyze if Med is essential for the association of Ote with bamSE. The specific bands containing bamSE are indicated by an arrow. The results indicate that Med is essential for the association of Ote with bamSE. (D) The cDNAs were isolated from S2 cells as in (C). PCR (30 cycles) was performed to analyze whether medea mRNA was efficiently knocked down. (E) S2 cells transfected with Flag:Ote (or Flag:OteΔLEM) were analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation with Flag antibody. PCR (23 cycles) was performed by using bam promoter-specific primers. The specific bands containing bamSE are indicated by an arrow. Developmental Cell 2008 14, 494-506DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions