Don’t hate on your audience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Argument: Rogerian Developed by psychologist, Carl Rogers, in the 1950s Attempts to reach common ground between the speaker and the audience When composing.
Three choices for Argument/Synthesis Writing
 An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid.  Arguments seek to make people.
Three Methods for Building Arguments
Argument as Rational Discourse To make an argument, you need an issue. Topic: Death of Trayvon Martin How is this an issue?
After carefully considering the visual argument below, write an argument either condoning or refuting this idea. Add support of your own to strengthen.
Being persuasive… Learn how to persuade your peers!
Rogerian Argument Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers.
Rogerian Argument Based on the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers.
Argument as Rational Discourse To make an argument, you need an issue. Issue: Swine Flu or H1N1 How is this an issue?
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Structuring Arguments. Structuring arguments  Defines which parts go where  Logical arguments described as:  Inductive reasoning  Deductive reasoning:
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
Title Slide Based on Smith, John (2XX), “New idea,” Marketing Science, Vol. X, No. Y, xx-yy. 1Science to Pratice Initiative Template.
Argument as Rational Discourse To make an argument, you need an issue. Issue: Swine Flu or H1N1 How is this an issue?
Essays are graded on a NINE point scale, just like AP essays 9 = 100 8= 97 7 = 93 6 = 86 5 = 80 4 = 77 3 = 72 2= 70 1 = 65 NS = below 60 Right now, if.
The Five Canons of Rhetoric 1.Invention: Brainstorm/Pre-write 2.Arrangement: Particular order, a set pattern. 3.Style: Grammatically correct, clear and.
The Argumentative Essay. What exactly is an Argument? An argument involves the process of establishing a claim and then proving it with the use of logical.
The Classical Model for Argumentation. Organization Classical rhetoricians call this arrangement since you must consider how your essay and its individual.
Rogerian Model not confrontational in methods; authors do not have an opponent, you have an audience in addition, you are not constructing an opinionated,
 Influences the reader by using fact based evidence and reasoning to express a point of view or uncover the truth  It is the process of establishing.
English 100 Tuesday, On a sheet of paper, write about the following prompt… you will keep this in your notebook: Identify and list the five most.
Don’t hate on your audience.
The Argumentative Essay
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
Rogerian Strategy in Arguments
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Three Methods for Building Arguments
Argumentative Writing Project Notes
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
Taken from Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument
Rogerian Argument A Psychologist’s View.
Rogerian Argument A Psychologist’s View.
Everything’s An Argument
Writing.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: Toulmin, and Rogerian Models
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Argument Essay Point/Counterpoint.
Models for argumentation
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Audience.
Don’t hate on your audience.
Don’t hate on your audience.
Introduction to Argument and Rhetoric
Constructing Arguments
Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
(in general… and for this essay)
Audience.
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments:
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Everything’s An Argument
Negotiating, We Do It All The Time!
Critical Response: How to begin
Rogerian argument.
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
Argument and Persuasion
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments:
Counter-Arguments and Concessions
Parts of an Argument “Not an inch to the west! Not an inch to the east! I’ll stay here, not budging! I can and I will. If it makes you and me and the whole.
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Rogerian “Argument”
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Rogerian Model
(in general… and for this essay)
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Presentation transcript:

Don’t hate on your audience. Rogerian Argument Don’t hate on your audience.

Rogerian Argument Seeks to establish trust and find COMMON GROUND. Assume that audience &/or opposition is made up of REASONABLE people. This is, unfortunately, not always true. Therefore, Rogerian argument is not always the best approach. Seeks to UNDERSTAND the point of view of those with whom they disagree To start a DIALOGUE or DISCOURSE BOTH/AND instead of EITHER/OR WIN/WIN instead of WIN/LOSE

How to use Rogerian Argument Here is an example of what a Rogerian argument might look like: Intro – sets context Summary of Opposing Views* Statement of Understanding* Statement of Contexts Statement of Benefits Important parts/pose a solution – here is where you “concede” something to the opposing side and acknowledge that others who think differently from you are also intelligent, reasonable people.

Things that happen in a Rogerian Argument Speaker/writer shows (sympathetic) understanding to the opposition. Speaker/writer demonstrates that those who disagree with them are still reasonable, intelligent people of good will (not fools and idiots). Speaker/writer is non-confrontational, even friendly (not “my way or the highway”).

Phases of Rogerian Phase One: Present the issue and suggest why it’s important; explain or summarize the opponent’s/other perspectives on this particular issue in NEUTRAL language Phase Two: Acknowledge any valid aspects of your opponent’s argument as well as drawbacks in NON-CONFRONTATIONAL language Suggest common ground that you share

Phases of Rogerian Phase Three: Present a solution; show how both parties will have to concede as well as how both parties will benefit; emphasize the common ground where both could agree Writer creates cooperation, the possibility that both sides might change, and a mutually advantageous outcome.

To Review… State the problem or issue. Give the both sides of issue. Grant some validity to parts of it. Recognize circumstances where it could be acceptable. State YOUR position, support it, and tell why the opposition will be IMPROVED by embracing your views. Why will the world be a better place for this?

Rogerian Draft Assignment Topic: NHS case study on class page Present both sides of the argument in non-confrontational language and then propose a solution. Submit your draft to Turnitin by 6am