Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Serotonin Modulates Circadian Entrainment in Drosophila
Advertisements

Organization of the Drosophila Circadian Control Circuit
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Drosophila CRY Is a Deep Brain Circadian Photoreceptor
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages (December 1999)
Evidence that the TIM Light Response Is Relevant to Light-Induced Phase Shifts in Drosophila melanogaster  Vipin Suri, Zuwei Qian, Jeffrey C Hall, Michael.
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (April 2004)
Shobhan Gaddameedhi, Christopher P. Selby, Michael G
A Molecular Rhythm Mediating Circadian Clock Output in Drosophila
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
The Drosophila Circadian Network Is a Seasonal Timer
John Majercak, David Sidote, Paul E. Hardin, Isaac Edery  Neuron 
Sensory Conflict Disrupts Activity of the Drosophila Circadian Network
Response of the Timeless Protein to Light Correlates with Behavioral Entrainment and Suggests a Nonvisual Pathway for Circadian Photoreception  Zhaohai.
Joowon Suh, F. Rob Jackson  Neuron 
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Circadian Regulation of Gene Expression Systems in the Drosophila Head
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Hery Ratsima, Diego Serrano, Mirela Pascariu, Damien D’Amours 
Circadian Control of Eclosion
Suppression of Constant-Light-Induced Blindness but Not Retinal Degeneration by Inhibition of the Rhodopsin Degradation Pathway  Seung-Jae Lee, Craig.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
John Majercak, David Sidote, Paul E. Hardin, Isaac Edery  Neuron 
Temperature Synchronization of the Drosophila Circadian Clock
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Zijing Chen, Hsiang-Chin Chen, Craig Montell  Cell Reports 
Circadian Clock Neurons in the Silkmoth Antheraea pernyi: Novel Mechanisms of Period Protein Regulation  Ivo Sauman, Steven M Reppert  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
Sebastian Martinek, Susan Inonog, Armen S. Manoukian, Michael W. Young 
Molecular Analysis of Mammalian Timeless
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Alejandro Murad, Myai Emery-Le, Patrick Emery  Neuron 
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Seung-Jae Lee, Craig Montell  Neuron 
The Drosophila CLOCK Protein Undergoes Daily Rhythms in Abundance, Phosphorylation, and Interactions with the PER–TIM Complex  Choogon Lee, Kiho Bae,
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
The CRYPTOCHROME Photoreceptor Gates PDF Neuropeptide Signaling to Set Circadian Network Hierarchy in Drosophila  Luoying Zhang, Bridget C. Lear, Adam.
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2001)
Drosophila Clock Can Generate Ectopic Circadian Clocks
Deniz Top, Emily Harms, Sheyum Syed, Eliza L. Adams, Lino Saez 
Yong Zhang, Patrick Emery  Neuron 
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
VRILLE Controls PDF Neuropeptide Accumulation and Arborization Rhythms in Small Ventrolateral Neurons to Drive Rhythmic Behavior in Drosophila  Kushan.
Pallavi Lamba, Diana Bilodeau-Wentworth, Patrick Emery, Yong Zhang 
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Light-Dependent Interactions between the Drosophila Circadian Clock Factors Cryptochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless  Nicolai Peschel, Ko Fan Chen, Gisela Szabo,
Glial Cells Physiologically Modulate Clock Neurons and Circadian Behavior in a Calcium-Dependent Manner  Fanny S. Ng, Michelle M. Tangredi, F. Rob Jackson 
Regulation of the Drosophila Protein Timeless Suggests a Mechanism for Resetting the Circadian Clock by Light  Melissa Hunter-Ensor, Andrea Ousley, Amita.
Phosphorylation of PERIOD Is Influenced by Cycling Physical Associations of DOUBLE- TIME, PERIOD, and TIMELESS in the Drosophila Clock  Brian Kloss, Adrian.
Ying Tan, Zdravko Dragovic, Till Roenneberg, Martha Merrow 
Flies by Night Current Biology
Zhaohai Yang, Amita Sehgal  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Adrian Rothenfluh, Michael W. Young, Lino Saez  Neuron 
The Drosophila dCREB2 Gene Affects the Circadian Clock
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Deniz Top, Emily Harms, Sheyum Syed, Eliza L. Adams, Lino Saez 
Justin Blau, Michael W Young  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (March 2002)
Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain  Mark.
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (April 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 921-929 (November 1996) The timSL Mutant of the Drosophila Rhythm Gene timeless Manifests Allele-Specific Interactions with period Gene Mutants  Joan E Rutila, Hongkui Zeng, Myai Le, Kathryn D Curtin, Jeffrey C Hall, Michael Rosbash  Neuron  Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 921-929 (November 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8

Figure 1 Activity Profiles of a Novel Rhythm Mutantelvis (timSL) Individual flies were entrained for 2 days before their activity was monitored in constant darkness (DD) at 25°C. Behavior of four individual flies representative of their genotype is depicted in these actograms, where each bar denotes ten activity events, and the data is double plotted (first line: day 1, day 2; second line: day 2, day 3; etc.). Striped bars refer to the 12 hr subjective light phase and filled bars the 12 hr subjective dark phase defined by the entrainment cycle. The period, τ, is given for the particular flies which are graphed here. The elvis mutant was later renamed timSL (see Results). CS, Canton-S wild type. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 2 Eclosion Profile of per L;elvis (timSL) The timing of fly eclosion from pupal cases of three different populations, assayed at 18°C in DD for 7 days, is depicted graphically. Data were combined from two (Canton-S [CS] wild-type), three (per L), and three (per L;elvis/elvis) experiments and represent a total of 2500 (per L) to 3800 (per L;elvis/elvis) eclosing flies. The dotted lines denote the subjective start of each dark phase that was used for entrainment. The calculated period, τ, is shown for each genotype. The elvis mutant was later renamed timSL (see Results). Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 3 Nuclear Entry of PER and PER-L in Brain Lateral Neurons Canton-S (CS) wild-typeper L, or per L;timSL flies were collected in the dark phase of an LD cycle at the indicated time. Frozen sections were treated with anti-PER antibody, and putative pacemaker cells (the lateral neurons) were examined. The lateral neurons from a minimum of seven fly heads were examined for each sample. The percentages of flies with nuclear (N) staining were as follows: Canton-S, ZT 17 (0% N); Canton-S, ZT 19 (100% N); per L, ZT 21 (0% N); per L, ZT 23 (53% N); per L;timSL, ZT 19 (27% N)per L;timSL, ZT 21 (86% N). Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 4 The timSL Mutation Restores Temperature Compensation to per L Flies Periods, in hours, were calculated for Can-ton-S wild-type (squares)per L (diamonds), or per L;timSL/timSL (circles) flies at 18°C, 25°C, or 29°C in constant darkness. The numbers of flies tested (N) and the SEM of the period (in hours), respectively, are as follows: 18°C Canton-S (13, 0.3), 18°C per L (19, 0.1), 18°C per L;timSL (14, 1.0), 25°C Canton-S (27, 0.1), 25°C per L (34, 0.1), 25°C per L;timSL (27, 0.1), 29°C Canton-S (13, 0.1), 29°C per L (15, 0.3), 29°C per L;timSL (30, 0.2). Error bars on the graph depict the above SEMs and are not drawn if only 0.1. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 5 TIM-SL Fails to Alter the PER-L/TIM Interaction in Yeast The bait constructs contain LexA fused to TIM or TIM-SL (amino acids 449–906), while the prey constructs contain PER or PER-L 233–685 (Huang et al. 1995). Doubly transformed haploids were grown at 25°C (A) or 30°C (B) on his− trp− plates containing galactose, raffinose, and X-Gal. A dash refers to control bait or prey plasmids without insert. No detectable difference between PER-L/TIM and PER-L/TIM-SL was seen at either 20°C or 37°C as well (J. R., unpublished data). Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 5 TIM-SL Fails to Alter the PER-L/TIM Interaction in Yeast The bait constructs contain LexA fused to TIM or TIM-SL (amino acids 449–906), while the prey constructs contain PER or PER-L 233–685 (Huang et al. 1995). Doubly transformed haploids were grown at 25°C (A) or 30°C (B) on his− trp− plates containing galactose, raffinose, and X-Gal. A dash refers to control bait or prey plasmids without insert. No detectable difference between PER-L/TIM and PER-L/TIM-SL was seen at either 20°C or 37°C as well (J. R., unpublished data). Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 6 Cycling of TIM and PER in per L;timSL Head Extracts Extracts made from Canton-S wild-typeper LtimSLper L;timSLper0, or per0;timSL heads (collected during LD) were run on 6% SDS gels, blotted, and probed with anti-PER (A) or anti-TIM (B–D) antibody. Brackets indicate the differently phosphorylated forms of either PER or TIM, while the small arrows refer to a cross-reacting band. Open bars are the light phase, and closed bars the dark phase of a 12 hr light:12 hr dark cycle, as shown in (A) and (B). Samples from ZT 15 to ZT 23 (all in the dark phase) and CT1 (also in the dark, 1 hr after lights should have come on) were run side-by-side in (C) to visualize the phosphorylation difference between TIM and TIM-SL. The examples shown in (C) are representative of seven independent experiments, all of which show increased phosphorylation of TIM-SL relative to TIM. In (D), all samples were taken at ZT 23. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 6 Cycling of TIM and PER in per L;timSL Head Extracts Extracts made from Canton-S wild-typeper LtimSLper L;timSLper0, or per0;timSL heads (collected during LD) were run on 6% SDS gels, blotted, and probed with anti-PER (A) or anti-TIM (B–D) antibody. Brackets indicate the differently phosphorylated forms of either PER or TIM, while the small arrows refer to a cross-reacting band. Open bars are the light phase, and closed bars the dark phase of a 12 hr light:12 hr dark cycle, as shown in (A) and (B). Samples from ZT 15 to ZT 23 (all in the dark phase) and CT1 (also in the dark, 1 hr after lights should have come on) were run side-by-side in (C) to visualize the phosphorylation difference between TIM and TIM-SL. The examples shown in (C) are representative of seven independent experiments, all of which show increased phosphorylation of TIM-SL relative to TIM. In (D), all samples were taken at ZT 23. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 6 Cycling of TIM and PER in per L;timSL Head Extracts Extracts made from Canton-S wild-typeper LtimSLper L;timSLper0, or per0;timSL heads (collected during LD) were run on 6% SDS gels, blotted, and probed with anti-PER (A) or anti-TIM (B–D) antibody. Brackets indicate the differently phosphorylated forms of either PER or TIM, while the small arrows refer to a cross-reacting band. Open bars are the light phase, and closed bars the dark phase of a 12 hr light:12 hr dark cycle, as shown in (A) and (B). Samples from ZT 15 to ZT 23 (all in the dark phase) and CT1 (also in the dark, 1 hr after lights should have come on) were run side-by-side in (C) to visualize the phosphorylation difference between TIM and TIM-SL. The examples shown in (C) are representative of seven independent experiments, all of which show increased phosphorylation of TIM-SL relative to TIM. In (D), all samples were taken at ZT 23. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 6 Cycling of TIM and PER in per L;timSL Head Extracts Extracts made from Canton-S wild-typeper LtimSLper L;timSLper0, or per0;timSL heads (collected during LD) were run on 6% SDS gels, blotted, and probed with anti-PER (A) or anti-TIM (B–D) antibody. Brackets indicate the differently phosphorylated forms of either PER or TIM, while the small arrows refer to a cross-reacting band. Open bars are the light phase, and closed bars the dark phase of a 12 hr light:12 hr dark cycle, as shown in (A) and (B). Samples from ZT 15 to ZT 23 (all in the dark phase) and CT1 (also in the dark, 1 hr after lights should have come on) were run side-by-side in (C) to visualize the phosphorylation difference between TIM and TIM-SL. The examples shown in (C) are representative of seven independent experiments, all of which show increased phosphorylation of TIM-SL relative to TIM. In (D), all samples were taken at ZT 23. Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)

Figure 7 Bypass Suppressor Model for TIM-SL (Top) PER (P) and TIM (T) heterodimerize and that dimer is phosphorylated (P) with time (arrows). (Middle) PER-L (PL) weakens the PER/TIM interaction, and the PER-L/TIM dimer stays relatively unphosphorylated throughout the cycle. (Bottom) TIM-SL (TSL) does not alter the interaction with PER, but changes another part of TIM so that the protein could be phosphorylated more quickly (heavy arrows), differently (extra phosphates), or may have an altered interaction with another substrate (not shown). Neuron 1996 17, 921-929DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80223-8)