Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap Ranking of the Districts 1st QUARTER 2016-17 (September 2016)

Monitoring & Management OVERVIEW OF INDICATORS & TARGETS Indicators Metrics Definitions Target Core Student attendance (1-12) District Specific A1 Student present as % of total students enrolled A2 Teacher presence Teachers present as a % of total teachers 90% A3 Functioning facilities Functioning & available facilities as a % of total required facilities 95% A4 District administrator visits % of schools visited by district administrators 90% Retention B1 Student attendance (Kachi) Student present as % of total students enrolled District Specific B2 Retention (Kachi) Current enrolment as % of baseline enrolment retained District Specific B3 Student attendance (1-5) Student present as % of total students enrolled District Specific B4 Current enrolment as % of baseline enrolment retained District Specific Retention (1-5) Infra- structure C1 OCMG due to teachers Schools with inadequate number of primary teachers as a % of total schools District Specific C2 OCMG due to classrooms Schools with inadequate number of classrooms as a % of total schools District Specific C3 Dangerous buildings Schools with dangerous buildings as a % of total schools 2% Monitoring & Management D1 AEO span of control Average number of schools per AEO 23/1 D2 DTE visits % of schools with adequate number of coaching visits by DTEs 90%

1-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (1-12) Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 OKARA 94.8 90 4.8 2 PAKPATTAN 91.4 88 3.4 3 CHAKWAL 93.3 3.3 4 CHINIOT 92.9 2.9 5 JHANG 92.2 2.2 6 MIANWALI 90.2 7 JHELUM 91.9 1.9 8 RAHIMYAR KHAN 86.9 85 9 KASUR 91.8 1.8 10 D.G. KHAN 86.5 1.5 11 NANKANA SAHIB 89.5 12 T.T.SINGH 1.4 13 GUJRANWALA 89.3 1.3 14 GUJRAT 91.3 15 BHAKKAR 86.2 1.2 16 BAHAWALNAGAR 91.1 1.1 17 MULTAN 90.9 0.9 18 NAROWAL 88.9 19 VEHARI 90.7 0.7 20 LAYYAH 88.5 0.5 21 HAFIZABAD 90.5 22 MUZAFFARGARH 23 BAHAWALPUR 90.3 0.3 24 M.B.DIN 0.2 25 LODHRAN 89.99 (0.0) 26 KHANEWAL 89.7 (0.3) 27 ATTOCK 89.6 (0.4) 28 KHUSHAB (0.5) 29 SAHIWAL 30 RAJANPUR 84.4 (0.6) 31 RAWALPINDI 87.2 (0.8) 32 FAISALABAD 89.2 33 LAHORE 88.2 (1.8) 34 SARGODHA 88.1 (1.9) 35 SHEIKHUPURA 87.4 (2.6) 36 SIALKOT 86.8 (3.2) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 89.6% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Gujranwala PMIU-PESRP

2-TEACHER PRESENCE Target: 90% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sep’16 Target Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 OKARA 97.7 90 7.67 2 JHELUM 95.2 5.23 3 SHEIKHUPURA 94.9 4.86 4 CHINIOT 94.6 4.63 5 MUZAFFARGARH 4.57 6 PAKPATTAN 94.3 4.30 7 LODHRAN 4.28 8 ATTOCK 94.2 4.23 9 LAYYAH 4.19 10 KASUR 4.16 11 MIANWALI 94.1 4.13 12 CHAKWAL 4.12 13 MULTAN 4.10 14 T.T.SINGH 94.0 4.03 15 NANKANA SAHIB 3.96 16 GUJRAT 93.9 3.92 17 GUJRANWALA 3.87 18 KHUSHAB 93.5 3.53 19 JHANG 93.4 3.44 20 HAFIZABAD 3.37 21 BHAKKAR 93.3 3.27 22 LAHORE 23 D.G. KHAN 93.2 3.21 24 SAHIWAL 3.20 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 93.0 3.03 26 FAISALABAD 3.02 27 BAHAWALPUR 92.9 2.89 28 SARGODHA 92.6 2.60 29 RAJANPUR 92.5 2.54 30 VEHARI 92.4 2.41 31 M.B.DIN 92.3 2.27 32 KHANEWAL 92.2 2.20 33 RAHIMYAR KHAN 91.8 1.83 34 RAWALPINDI 91.7 1.71 35 NAROWAL 91.5 1.54 36 SIALKOT 91.1 1.07 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 93.4 % Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Present Teachers: 1-Physicall Present Teachers 2-On Exam Duty 3-On Training PMIU-PESRP

3-VISIT BY ADMINISTRATORS Target: 50% (13 working days in Aug’16) Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 PAKPATTAN 99.7 50 49.66 2 OKARA 3 LODHRAN 99.4 49.37 4 JHELUM 99.2 49.16 5 CHINIOT 99.0 48.96 6 CHAKWAL 98.8 48.76 7 FAISALABAD 98.5 48.54 8 JHANG 98.3 48.27 9 GUJRAT 97.5 47.49 10 NAROWAL 47.47 11 MUZAFFARGARH 97.3 47.32 12 MIANWALI 47.26 13 BAHAWALNAGAR 97.2 47.24 14 VEHARI 97.1 47.13 15 RAJANPUR 96.3 46.32 16 BAHAWALPUR 96.0 45.99 17 GUJRANWALA 95.4 45.39 18 LAYYAH 95.1 45.07 19 SHEIKHUPURA 94.5 44.54 20 KHANEWAL 94.0 44.02 21 D.G. KHAN 93.7 43.74 22 MULTAN 43.71 23 RAWALPINDI 43.65 24 KASUR 92.5 42.54 25 SAHIWAL 92.2 42.15 26 ATTOCK 92.1 42.06 27 BHAKKAR 91.9 41.92 28 T.T.SINGH 91.5 41.47 29 SARGODHA 89.9 39.85 30 NANKANA SAHIB 87.3 37.35 31 SIALKOT 37.26 32 HAFIZABAD 86.7 36.68 33 RAHIMYAR KHAN 84.8 34.76 34 LAHORE 83.9 33.89 35 KHUSHAB 72.8 22.76 36 M.B.DIN 62.9 12.87 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 93.3% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Administrators: 1-AEOs 2-DEOs 3-DDEOs 4-EDOs Etc. PMIU-PESRP

4-FUNCTIONING OF FACILITIES Target: 95% Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 JHELUM 99.7 95.0 4.7 2 LAHORE 3 GUJRAT 99.5 4.5 4 CHINIOT 99.4 4.4 5 LAYYAH 99.2 4.2 6 VEHARI 99.1 4.1 7 KHANEWAL 99.0 4.0 8 GUJRANWALA 9 LODHRAN 98.9 3.9 10 PAKPATTAN 11 M.B.DIN 98.7 3.7 12 OKARA 13 KASUR 98.5 3.5 14 CHAKWAL 15 FAISALABAD 98.4 3.4 16 ATTOCK 98.2 3.2 17 SARGODHA 18 MULTAN 98.1 3.1 19 MUZAFFARGARH 97.7 2.7 20 T.T.SINGH 21 HAFIZABAD 97.4 2.4 22 SIALKOT 97.1 2.1 23 MIANWALI 96.8 1.8 24 KHUSHAB 96.7 1.7 25 SHEIKHUPURA 96.2 1.2 26 SAHIWAL 27 BHAKKAR 96.0 1.0 28 NAROWAL 29 BAHAWALPUR 95.9 0.9 30 BAHAWALNAGAR 95.8 0.8 31 NANKANA SAHIB 32 RAWALPINDI 0.0 33 JHANG 94.8 (0.2) 34 RAHIMYAR KHAN 94.0 (1.0) 35 D.G. KHAN 90.1 (4.9) 36 RAJANPUR 88.9 (6.1) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 97% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Facilities: 1-Electricity 2-Drinking Water 3-Toilets 4-Boundary Wall PMIU-PESRP

5-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (K) Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 CHAKWAL 93.6 90 3.6 2 OKARA 92.8 2.8 3 PAKPATTAN 90.0 88 2.0 4 JHANG 91.7 1.7 5 CHINIOT 91.4 1.4 6 MUZAFFARGARH 89.4 7 LODHRAN 90.7 0.7 8 RAHIMYAR KHAN 84.99 85 (0.0) 9 MULTAN 89.9 (0.1) 10 T.T.SINGH 89.7 (0.3) 11 JHELUM 12 ATTOCK 13 HAFIZABAD 89.1 (0.9) 14 GUJRAT 88.9 (1.1) 15 LAYYAH 86.9 16 BAHAWALNAGAR 88.6 (1.4) 17 NANKANA SAHIB 86.6 18 KASUR 19 BAHAWALPUR 20 VEHARI 88.4 (1.6) 21 KHANEWAL 88.1 (1.9) 22 FAISALABAD 88.0 (2.0) 23 BHAKKAR 82.6 (2.4) 24 D.G. KHAN 82.5 (2.5) 25 GUJRANWALA 85.4 (2.6) 26 M.B.DIN 86.7 (3.3) 27 MIANWALI 84.6 (3.4) 28 LAHORE 86.5 (3.5) 29 RAWALPINDI 84.0 (4.0) 30 KHUSHAB 85.5 (4.5) 31 NAROWAL 83.4 (4.6) 32 SAHIWAL 85.3 (4.7) 33 SHEIKHUPURA 85.2 (4.8) 34 RAJANPUR 79.9 (5.1) 35 SARGODHA 84.9 36 SIALKOT 76.7 (13.3) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 87% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

6-RETENTION (K) Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 LAHORE 100.0 92.0 8.00 2 PAKPATTAN 93.0 7.00 3 KHANEWAL 93.4 6.57 4 BAHAWALNAGAR 93.6 6.41 5 RAJANPUR 94.1 5.88 6 RAWALPINDI 94.3 5.74 7 NANKANA SAHIB 94.4 5.56 8 ATTOCK 95.4 4.61 9 GUJRANWALA 95.6 4.36 10 HAFIZABAD 95.7 4.26 11 CHINIOT 95.8 4.16 12 MUZAFFARGARH 96.1 3.93 13 SARGODHA 96.2 3.85 14 SAHIWAL 96.3 3.67 15 JHELUM 3.66 16 SIALKOT 96.4 3.60 17 VEHARI 96.7 3.30 18 D.G. KHAN 3.26 19 BAHAWALPUR 96.9 3.06 20 MULTAN 97.0 2.96 21 JHANG 97.1 2.94 22 T.T.SINGH 97.2 2.77 23 BHAKKAR 97.3 2.72 24 SHEIKHUPURA 97.4 2.62 25 NAROWAL 97.6 2.44 26 RAHIMYAR KHAN 97.7 2.30 27 LODHRAN 2.26 28 FAISALABAD 98.2 1.84 29 LAYYAH 98.3 1.75 30 OKARA 1.71 31 GUJRAT 98.7 1.33 32 KASUR 1.31 33 MIANWALI 1.29 34 CHAKWAL 98.9 1.13 35 KHUSHAB 84.1 - 12.80 36 M.B.DIN 69.3 - 27.17 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 99.4% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

7-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (1-5) Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 OKARA 94.1 90 4.1 2 PAKPATTAN 91.9 88 3.9 3 CHAKWAL 93.1 3.1 4 CHINIOT 92.6 2.6 5 JHANG 91.6 1.6 6 RAHIMYAR KHAN 86.6 85 7 NANKANA SAHIB 89.3 1.3 8 KASUR 91.1 1.1 9 T.T.SINGH 90.9 0.9 10 GUJRAT 11 HAFIZABAD 90.8 0.8 12 JHELUM 13 NAROWAL 88.6 0.6 14 MIANWALI 88.5 0.5 15 MUZAFFARGARH 16 BAHAWALNAGAR 90.4 0.4 17 LODHRAN 90.3 0.3 18 VEHARI 90.2 0.2 19 BHAKKAR 85.1 0.1 20 D.G. KHAN 85.0 0.0 21 GUJRANWALA 87.9 (0.1) 22 MULTAN 89.9 23 LAYYAH 87.8 (0.2) 24 KHANEWAL 89.7 (0.3) 25 BAHAWALPUR 26 FAISALABAD 89.5 (0.5) 27 ATTOCK (0.7) 28 M.B.DIN 89.1 (0.9) 29 SAHIWAL 88.7 (1.3) 30 KHUSHAB 88.3 (1.7) 31 RAWALPINDI 86.0 (2.0) 32 LAHORE (2.2) 33 RAJANPUR 82.7 (2.3) 34 SARGODHA 87.1 (2.9) 35 SHEIKHUPURA 86.8 (3.2) 36 SIALKOT 84.9 (5.1) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 89% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

8-RETENTION (1-5) Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 PAKPATTAN 96.3 77.2 19.1 2 LAHORE 99.9 86.7 13.2 3 JHELUM 98.8 88.2 10.6 4 RAJANPUR 98.2 88.7 9.4 5 BAHAWALNAGAR 98.3 89.0 9.3 6 LODHRAN 100.0 91.3 8.7 7 GUJRANWALA 90.6 7.7 8 NANKANA SAHIB 98.7 91.1 7.6 9 ATTOCK 95.3 87.9 7.4 10 JHANG 92.6 7.3 11 MULTAN 93.7 6.3 12 SAHIWAL 96.7 5.4 13 BAHAWALPUR 96.6 91.4 5.2 14 BHAKKAR 97.6 93.0 4.6 15 D.G. KHAN 97.2 93.3 3.9 16 LAYYAH 99.1 95.6 3.4 17 CHINIOT 95.0 3.2 18 KHANEWAL 94.4 3.1 19 RAWALPINDI 96.9 94.3 2.6 20 MIANWALI 99.4 97.0 2.5 21 VEHARI 97.8 95.5 2.3 22 SARGODHA 95.9 23 FAISALABAD 2.1 24 T.T.SINGH 99.0 2.0 25 OKARA 1.9 26 RAHIMYAR KHAN 93.6 27 SIALKOT 97.1 95.4 1.7 28 KASUR 99.3 97.7 1.6 29 SHEIKHUPURA 30 GUJRAT 99.5 0.4 31 CHAKWAL 97.3 0.3 32 MUZAFFARGARH 92.4 92.9 (0.5) 33 NAROWAL (0.7) 34 HAFIZABAD 94.2 (3.1) 35 KHUSHAB 77.1 (13.5) 36 M.B.DIN 66.5 96.5 (30.0) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 97% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

9-DANGEROUS BUILDING Target: 2% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sep’16 Target Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 SARGODHA 0.5 2 1.54 CHAKWAL 0.8 1.20 3 HAFIZABAD 1.6 0.37 4 OKARA 1.7 0.28 5 MUZAFFARGARH 1.9 0.14 6 PAKPATTAN 2.4 (0.39) 7 M.B.DIN 2.7 (0.66) 8 LAYYAH 3.1 (1.05) 9 JHELUM 3.4 (1.35) 10 JHANG 3.6 (1.60) 11 GUJRAT 4.1 (2.09) 12 SHEIKHUPURA 4.5 (2.53) 13 MIANWALI 4.6 (2.62) 14 KASUR 5.4 (3.44) 15 SIALKOT 5.6 (3.59) 16 KHANEWAL 6.2 (4.17) 17 BAHAWALPUR 6.4 (4.38) 18 MULTAN 6.5 (4.53) 19 LAHORE 7.6 (5.57) 20 RAHIMYAR KHAN 7.9 (5.92) 21 KHUSHAB 8.6 (6.58) 22 CHINIOT 9.3 (7.25) 23 BAHAWALNAGAR 9.8 (7.77) 24 RAJANPUR 9.9 (7.90) 25 VEHARI (7.92) 26 GUJRANWALA 10.2 (8.24) 27 BHAKKAR 10.4 (8.41) 28 NAROWAL 10.5 (8.46) 29 NANKANA SAHIB 10.9 (8.88) 30 FAISALABAD 13.0 (11.01) 31 ATTOCK 13.9 (11.89) 32 T.T.SINGH 14.0 (12.00) 33 LODHRAN 15.9 (13.91) 34 RAWALPINDI 16.1 (14.15) 35 SAHIWAL 16.5 (14.46) 36 D.G. KHAN 19.1 (17.11) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 7.8% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Dangerous Building: 1-Partially 2-Fully PMIU-PESRP

10-OCMG - CLASSROOMS Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 D.G. KHAN 56.7 47.1 (9.6) 2 T.T.SINGH 48.2 36.7 (11.5) 3 SARGODHA 40.1 27.2 (12.9) 4 LAHORE 51.8 35.8 (15.9) 5 JHANG 60.3 42.1 (18.2) 6 KHANEWAL 52.0 30.7 (21.3) 7 CHINIOT 65.5 44.0 (21.5) 8 RAWALPINDI 13.7 (22.1) 9 GUJRAT 46.6 23.3 (23.3) 10 CHAKWAL 33.3 9.0 (24.3) 11 JHELUM 37.2 12.7 (24.5) 12 FAISALABAD 67.3 41.8 (25.5) 13 NANKANA SAHIB 57.0 30.8 (26.2) 14 BAHAWALPUR 54.0 27.5 (26.5) 15 SHEIKHUPURA 64.8 38.3 (26.6) 16 MULTAN 61.5 34.6 (26.9) 17 KASUR 74.8 47.2 (27.6) 18 GUJRANWALA 29.1 (27.9) 19 ATTOCK 49.3 20.9 (28.4) 20 SAHIWAL 58.6 30.0 (28.6) 21 BAHAWALNAGAR 65.7 35.9 (29.8) 22 MUZAFFARGARH 71.9 41.2 (30.6) 23 LAYYAH 64.1 33.2 (31.0) 24 HAFIZABAD 56.4 25.3 (31.1) 25 MIANWALI 62.6 31.5 26 SIALKOT 63.6 32.3 (31.3) 27 OKARA 39.9 (31.9) 28 VEHARI 59.8 26.8 (33.0) 29 KHUSHAB 54.4 21.2 (33.2) 30 LODHRAN 60.9 27.1 (33.8) 31 RAJANPUR 74.0 40.0 (34.0) 32 RAHIMYAR KHAN 72.9 38.7 (34.2) 33 NAROWAL 66.1 31.8 (34.3) 34 PAKPATTAN 69.3 34.5 (34.9) 35 BHAKKAR 73.3 36.9 (36.3) 36 M.B.DIN 73.5 24.0 (49.6) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 59.4% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Enrolment Classrooms 30 2 45 3 150 4 230 6 310 8 >310 50:1 PMIU-PESRP

11-OCMG - TEACHERS Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 D.G. KHAN 55.1 56.5 1.4 2 JHANG 53.6 55.0 1.3 3 T.T.SINGH 50.0 47.4 (2.6) 4 BAHAWALPUR 52.6 (4.0) 5 SARGODHA 49.7 44.6 (5.1) 6 LAHORE 40.5 34.5 (6.0) 7 NANKANA SAHIB 58.7 52.0 (6.7) 8 OKARA 69.8 61.7 (8.1) 9 KASUR 64.7 (9.7) 10 MUZAFFARGARH 75.8 65.9 (10.0) 11 CHINIOT 71.7 60.1 (11.5) 12 VEHARI 77.3 (12.5) 13 RAHIMYAR KHAN 80.6 67.9 (12.7) 14 KHANEWAL 52.7 39.1 (13.6) 15 PAKPATTAN 79.5 65.8 (13.8) 16 GUJRAT 61.5 47.1 (14.4) 17 HAFIZABAD 72.9 57.8 (15.2) 18 LAYYAH 85.1 69.6 (15.5) 19 SHEIKHUPURA 71.8 55.9 (15.9) 20 BHAKKAR 82.2 65.4 (16.8) 21 NAROWAL 48.5 31.5 (17.0) 22 BAHAWALNAGAR 72.0 54.1 (18.0) 23 JHELUM 57.7 39.0 (18.7) 24 FAISALABAD 64.9 46.1 (18.8) 25 MIANWALI 67.0 47.8 (19.2) 26 MULTAN 62.7 43.4 (19.3) 27 GUJRANWALA 56.6 37.1 (19.5) 28 LODHRAN 52.5 29 SAHIWAL 71.9 50.5 (21.5) 30 ATTOCK 57.2 35.4 (21.8) 31 CHAKWAL 47.7 25.2 (22.5) 32 RAJANPUR 82.1 (23.4) 33 SIALKOT 56.3 32.8 (23.5) 34 RAWALPINDI 20.9 (25.2) 35 KHUSHAB 80.7 37.9 (42.8) 36 M.B.DIN 109.3 54.9 (54.4) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 64.4% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Enrolment Teachers 30 2 45 3 180 4 300 6 400 8 >400 50:1 PMIU-PESRP

12-AEO SPAN OF CONTROL Target: 23:1 PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sep’16 Target achieved Rank District Sep’16 Target Perf. against target Score 1 T.T.SINGH 13.7 23 9.3 2 KHANEWAL 3 FAISALABAD 13.8 9.2 4 RAHIMYAR KHAN 14.9 8.1 5 GUJRANWALA 15.2 7.8 6 CHAKWAL 15.3 7.7 7 SAHIWAL 15.4 7.6 8 SARGODHA 15.5 7.5 9 BAHAWALNAGAR 10 OKARA 15.8 7.2 11 JHELUM 16.4 6.6 12 M.B.DIN 13 GUJRAT 16.5 6.5 14 KASUR 16.7 6.3 15 MIANWALI 16.9 6.1 16 JHANG 17.2 5.8 17 KHUSHAB 17.9 5.1 18 CHINIOT 19 BAHAWALPUR 18.3 4.7 20 ATTOCK 19.1 3.9 21 SHEIKHUPURA 19.2 3.8 22 NANKANA SAHIB 19.5 3.5 LAHORE 24 PAKPATTAN 20.2 2.8 25 BHAKKAR 20.3 2.7 26 MULTAN 20.8 2.2 27 RAWALPINDI 21.1 1.9 28 LAYYAH 21.8 1.2 29 VEHARI 22.0 1.0 30 HAFIZABAD 23.3 (0.3) 31 RAJANPUR 26.2 (3.2) 32 MUZAFFARGARH 33.3 (10.3) 33 LODHRAN 34.2 (11.2) 34 NAROWAL 40.2 (17.2) 35 D.G. KHAN 42.8 (19.8) 36 SIALKOT 43.8 (20.8) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 19:1 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

CONSOLIDATED – 1st Quarter 2016-17 Equal to or greater than 12 Rank District Sep’16 1 OKARA 10 2 CHAKWAL 3 PAKPATTAN 9 4 CHINIOT 5 JHANG 6 JHELUM 8 7 MIANWALI KASUR T.T.SINGH NANKANA SAHIB 11 GUJRAT 12 MUZAFFARGARH 13 BHAKKAR 14 BAHAWALNAGAR 15 VEHARI 16 GUJRANWALA 17 MULTAN 18 LAYYAH 19 D.G. KHAN 20 LODHRAN 21 HAFIZABAD 22 RAHIMYAR KHAN 23 BAHAWALPUR 24 SARGODHA 25 ATTOCK 26 SAHIWAL 27 NAROWAL 28 SHEIKHUPURA 29 FAISALABAD 30 KHANEWAL 31 LAHORE 32 RAWALPINDI 33 MANDI BAHA UD DIN 34 SIALKOT 35 KHUSHAB 36 RAJANPUR Greater than or equal to 8 but less than 12 Greater than and equal to 6 but less than 8 Less than 6 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

CONSOLIDATED – 1st Quarter 2016-17 Equal to or greater than 12 Greater than or equal to 8 but less than 12 Greater than and equal to 6 but less than 8 Less than 6 Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Vehari . Rawalpindi Jhelum M.B . Din Narowal Okara Chakwal Kasur Division Score SAHIWAL 8.3 FAISALABAD 8.0 RAWALPINDI 7.5 BAHAWALPUR 7.3 LAHORE 7.0 MULTAN SARGODHA 6.8 D.G.KHAN 6.5 GUJRANWALA 6.3 Rawalpindi Gujranwala Sargodha Lahore Faisalabad Sahiwal D.G.Khan Multan Bahawalpur PMIU-PESRP

Top 5 Districts Okara Chakwal Pakpattan Chiniot Jhang

Bottom 5 Districts 36.Rajanpur 35.Khushab 34.Sialkot 33.M.B.Din 32.Rawalpindi

Thanks