Charge diffusion model (again)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
23 Jul 2008Paul Dauncey1 TPAC 1.1 vs TPAC2.0 vs TPAC2.1 Paul Dauncey.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell 16 μm x 16 μm P-well 17 μm x 17 μm Collecting diodes 3.6 μm x 3.6 μm Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes:
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
November 30th, 2006MAPS meeting - Anne-Marie Magnan - Imperial College London 1 MAPS simulation Application of charge diffusion on Geant4 simulation and.
Cluster Threshold Optimization from TIF data David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara July 26, 2007.
1 CALICE D4 simulation results G.Villani feb. 06 Cell size: 25 x 25  m 2 Epitaxial thickness: 20  m Diode location: S4 Diode size: 1.5 x 1.5  m 2 Cell.
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell ≈ 900 μm 2 P-well 1μm ring gap Collecting diodes 3.6 x 3.6 μm 2 Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes: 1.5V.
1 CALICE simulation results G.Villani oct. 06 Progress on CALICE MAPS detector simulations: Results for 1.8 x 1.8 µm 2 Discussions & conclusions Next step.
G.Villani jan. 071 CALICE pixel Deep P-Well results Nwell ≈ 900 μm 2 P-well 1μm ring gap Collecting diodes 3.6 x 3.6 μm 2 Bias: NWell 3.5V Diodes: 1.5V.
An offline look at TIF data David Stuart UC Santa Barbara May 2, 2007.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
PI laser jitter measurements Data taken on 11 th April 2013.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Simulation of RPC avalanche signal for a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Welcome to a before and after coherent noise removal series. There is a lot to explain about what is going on here, so I am using this otherwise wasted.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
Transformations Teacher Version Level
First, learn how to move shapes around a grid using reflections.
5th July 00PSI SEU Studies1 Preliminary PSI SEU Studies Study SEU effects by measuring the BER of the link in  /p beams at PSI. Measure the SEU rate as.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
First tests of CHERWELL, a Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor. A CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) using 180 nm technology James Mylroie-Smith Queen Mary, University.
CONFIDENTIAL1 Good Afternoon! Today we will be learning about Similarity and Symmetry Let’s warm up : Write Reflection, Rotation or Translation to describe.
More digital reading explaining LUT RT 244 Perry Sprawls, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Department of Radiology Emory University School of.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008. CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy.
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
26 Jan 2010Paul Dauncey1 TPAC papers Paul Dauncey.
Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Pixel Results from CRAFT09 U. Langenegger (PSI), G. Giurgiu (JHU) Pixel General Meeting November 10, 2009.
4 Jun 2008Paul Dauncey1 Crosstalk and laser results Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Matt Noy.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
23 Jan 2012 Background shape estimates using sidebands Paul Dauncey G. Davies, D. Futyan, J. Hays, M. Jarvis, M. Kenzie, C. Seez, J. Virdee, N. Wardle.
Physics performance of a DHCAL with various absorber materials Jan BLAHA CALICE Meeting, 16 – 18 Sep. 2009, Lyon, France.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
An update on ECAL simulations
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
C-Line Windowless Operation:
Design and Characterization of a Novel, Radiation-Resistant Active Pixel Sensor in a Standard 0.25 m CMOS Technology P.P. Allport, G. Casse, A. Evans,
Simple charge diffusion model
Shape activity Approx 1 period.
Detecting elements for the CALICE MAPS design
Use Absolute Value Functions and Transformations
FP1 Matrices Transformations
Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London
Types of Distributions
Scintillator tile- SiPM systems R&D
TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in.
Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test
CALICE: Major Items Since September
PIXEL Slow Simulation Status Report
Imperial laser system and analysis
CALICE simulation results G.Villani 06
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Beam properties for run
Presentation transcript:

Charge diffusion model (again) Paul Dauncey 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Diffusion model Same model as described in last meeting (27/02/09) Simple diffusion of charge to get spread between pixels Tuned to agree with Giulio’s GDS results at centre of pixel Previously, had generated two sets of data points for deep p-well MIP-like, i.e. charge spread evenly throughout the epitaxial layer depth; this was done on a fine grid of 1×1mm2 steps in x and y 55Fe-like, i.e. Charge deposited at a single point in depth; this was done for steps of 1mm in depth but coarser steps of 5×5mm2 steps in x and y Since then, did the mega-run; 1×1×1mm3 steps in x, y and z 3900 separate diffusion runs Use translation and reflection symmetry to give full 30000 points Gives detailed response to 55Fe and can be averaged in z to give original MIP-like response 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 0.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 1.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 2.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 3.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 4.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 5.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 6.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 7.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 8.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z= 9.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z=10.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Depth dependence z=11.5mm 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey

Fractional spectrum 1mm with MIP-like z White are all values in 3×3 pixel array Red are values in central pixel 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey Paul Dauncey 15

Fractional spectrum 1mm with 55Fe-like z Spectrum extends much higher now due to hits just below diodes Low peak still clearly visible; value of 31% fixed by matching Giulio’s results Is there a high peak? If so, maybe at 95%? Model not accurate here... 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey Paul Dauncey 16

Fractional spectrum 55Fe-like z vs Marcel Red old pixel Green new pixel Line shows “guess” at 10% simulation threshold equivalent for comparison Stretch Marcel’s plot to only go to high peak position ~200mV Agreement in not good in detail but general shape is similar 31 Mar 2009 Paul Dauncey Paul Dauncey 17