The power of Judicial Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid-term Review.
Advertisements

Judicial Branch The Supreme Court. Powers of Supreme Court Judicial Review Interpreting Laws Review any federal, state, or local law/action for constitutionality.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Commerce Commerce Industry Industry State’s rights State’s rights.
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
Chapter 8, Section 3 The Supreme Court. 1. How are Supreme Court justices selected? The president appoints the justices, with the consent of the Senate.
The Supreme Court.
Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.
Judicial Branch. Article Three of the Constitution.
AHSGE Supreme Court Cases. Brown v. Board of Education Ends segregation Overturns Plessy v. Ferguson.
 Marbury vs Madison  The Supreme Court can use Judicial Review –to rule on other branches of government.  McCulloch vs. Maryland-  Elastic.
Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.
The History of the Supreme Court HUSH Unit Three.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.
Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)
The Marshall Court.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.
Daily Quiz – 11/6 1. John Adams’ one term as President was plagued with problems caused by Anew states entering the Union. Bwars between England and France.
 a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed.  the composition.
Review for Test Constitutional Convention New Jersey vs. Virginia Plan Great Compromise 3/5 Compromise Preamble of Constitution Article 1- Legislative.
 Federalists lose Congressional elections and the presidency, but still control judicial branch  Pass Judiciary Act of 1801 which reduced Supreme Court.
US History ObjectiveAgenda Marshall Supreme Court Cases AVW: Monopoly Bellwork: Read “Federalist Plan to secede” pg 316 Create a slogan for a Federalist.
The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court
UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
Implied Powers of the National Government
Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
October 27, 2016 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Term Matching
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
Establishing Judicial Review
VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch
The Marshall Court.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
THE SUPREME COURT CIVICS CHAPTER 8, SECTION 3 CE.8B AND 8D
Supreme Court Cases.
Marbury vs. Madison and other landmark cases
How did John Marshall’s decisions strengthen the power of the federal government?
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Why was the case “Marbury vs. Madison” significant?
Supreme Court Congress Campaign Finance
Judicial review!.
October 25, 2018 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Term Matching
Growth of the Supreme Court
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
John Marshall Court US History.
Establishing Judicial Review
Defining the Powers of the National Government
What impact did John Marshall have on the U.S.?
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Marbury VS. Madison 1803.
Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic
James Monroe th President.
(Warm-Up 12-6) Which Supreme Court case set up the principle of judicial review? Gibbons v Ogden Marbury v Madison McCulloch v Maryland Engel v Vitale.
The Adams & Jefferson Years:
Do Now (Background Essay)
Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?
Checking the Constitutionality of the Law.
The Marshall Court.
Presentation transcript:

The power of Judicial Review Marbury vs Madison The power of Judicial Review

The case The story- The president and the Congress had tried to make the Supreme Court do something. Its not what you need to remember The outcome- something that the other branches had done was called unconstitutional by the court. This was a first in American history.

The Precedent Precedent- a legal example used in future cases Judicial Review- the supreme courts power to rule on the constitutionality of all laws and actions of the government and citizens of the USA President/congress Kentucky Fern Creek High School Mr. Sherman

John Marshall The chief justice of the Supreme Court at the time. Many groundbreaking decisions were made while he was chief justice We refer to that time as the “Marshall Court”. Marbury v Madison- Judicial Review McCullough v Maryland- Congress implied powers, supremacy clause Gibbons v Ogden- upholding and expanding the power of the interstate commerce clause

Judicial Review