Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 144, Issue 3, Pages e1 (March 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
IgE cross-linking impairs monocyte antiviral responses and inhibits influenza-driven TH1 differentiation  Regina K. Rowe, MD, PhD, David M. Pyle, MD,
Epstein-Barr virus–specific human T lymphocytes expressing antitumor chimeric T-cell receptors: potential for improved immunotherapy by Claudia Rossig,
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Synergy among receptors on resting NK cells for the activation of natural cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion by Yenan T. Bryceson, Michael E. March, Hans-Gustaf.
Ex Vivo Rapamycin Generates Th1/Tc1 or Th2/Tc2 Effector T Cells With Enhanced In Vivo Function and Differential Sensitivity to Post-transplant Rapamycin.
Culture expanded primary chondrocytes have potent immunomodulatory properties and do not induce an allogeneic immune response  P. Lohan, O. Treacy, K.
Expansion of FOXP3high regulatory T cells by human dendritic cells (DCs) in vitro and after injection of cytokine-matured DCs in myeloma patients by Devi.
Preactivation with IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 Induces CD25 and a Functional High-Affinity IL-2 Receptor on Human Cytokine-Induced Memory-like Natural Killer.
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2010)
miR-150-Mediated Foxo1 Regulation Programs CD8+ T Cell Differentiation
FLT3 ligand administration after hematopoietic cell transplantation increases circulating dendritic cell precursors that can be activated by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides.
Characterization of Interleukin-17–Producing Regulatory T Cells in Inflamed Intestinal Mucosa From Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases  Zaruhi Hovhannisyan,
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Generation of Highly Cytotoxic Natural Killer Cells for Treatment of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Using a Feeder-Free, Particle-Based Approach  Jeremiah.
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Display Intact Functionality  Elizabeth O. Stenger, Raghavan Chinnadurai,
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 144, Issue 3, Pages e1 (March 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Arming Cytokine-induced Killer Cells With Chimeric Antigen Receptors: CD28 Outperforms Combined CD28–OX40 “Super-stimulation”  Andreas A Hombach, Gunter.
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
A Rapamycin-Activated Caspase 9-Based Suicide Gene
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
The Notch Ligands Jagged2, Delta1, and Delta4 Induce Differentiation and Expansion of Functional Human NK Cells from CD34+ Cord Blood Hematopoietic Progenitor.
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
CD25 expression distinguishes functionally distinct alloreactive CD4+ CD134+ (OX40+) T-cell subsets in acute graft-versus-host disease  Philip R Streeter,
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Engineering HIV-Resistant, Anti-HIV Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
IL-4 and IL-13 Alter Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Responsiveness to CpG DNA and Herpes Simplex Virus-1  Jurjen Tel, Ruurd Torensma, Carl G. Figdor, I.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Protective Regulatory T Cell Generation in Autoimmune Diabetes by DNA Covaccination with Islet Antigens and a Selective CTLA-4 Ligand  Yelena Glinka,
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Sensing Bad: Are Co-stimulatory CAR-Expressing γδ T Cells Safer?
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 1234-1247 (May 2017) Avoidance of On-Target Off-Tumor Activation Using a Co-stimulation-Only Chimeric Antigen Receptor  Jonathan Fisher, Pierre Abramowski, Nisansala Dilrukshi Wisidagamage Don, Barry Flutter, Anna Capsomidis, Gordon Weng-Kit Cheung, Kenth Gustafsson, John Anderson  Molecular Therapy  Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 1234-1247 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Expressed in Expanded γδT Lymphocytes Enhances Antigen-Specific Cytotoxicity (A) Second-generation anti-GD2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) containing the CD3ζ and CD28 endodomains allows activation of T cells in the absence of TCR engagement. (B and C) 51Cr release assay demonstrating cytotoxicity of Vδ2+ γδT cells expressing an anti-GD2-28ζ CAR against GD2+ and GD2− neuroblastoma cell lines. In (B), antibody-dependent cytotoxicity at an E:T ratio of 10:1 was measured after coating the target cells with ch14.18/CHO anti-GD2 antibody or isotype control antibody (three independent experiments). In (C), statistical differences are shown for 10:1 E:T ratio. Error bars indicate mean values ± SEM; **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001 after Bonferroni post hoc analysis. The bar chart on the right shows 10:1 E:T ratio with analysis by unpaired t test; n = 3 independent donors for GD2-28-ζ and untransduced αβT cells, n = 6 for GD2-28-ζ CAR+ γδT cells, and n = 14 for untransduced γδT cells. Cytotoxicity assays were performed at day 6 after T cell transduction (9 days of culture for αβT cells and 11 days of culture for γδT). Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 GD2-DAP10 CARs Expressed in Vδ2+ γδT Cells (A) Vδ2+ γδT cells are activated in an MHC-independent manner by indirectly sensing increased phosphoantigen levels on tumors through engagement of the TCR with cognate ligand. Tumors evade γδT cell cytotoxicity by suppressing the co-stimulatory signals required. CARs containing co-stimulatory domains can bypass this evasion while retaining tumor specificity. Healthy tissues do not produce increased phosphoantigen levels so that the TCR is not engaged and the CAR alone is insufficient to provide full activation. (B) The GD2-DAP10 and GD2-28-ζ CARs have an Fc-derived linker and are co-expressed with a marker gene containing a minimal CD34 epitope. Transduced cells are therefore Fc+/CD34+. The gating strategy for determining transduction efficiency is shown. Transduced cells have much greater median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for CD34-APC than non-transduced cells (4,242 ± 1,215 versus 46.6 ± 15.4; n = 6). (C) Transduction efficiency of Vδ2+ cells and αβT cells was consistent, though there is a large degree of donor-donor variation in Vδ2+ cell percentages after transduction. Transduction with either CAR had no significant effect on Vδ2+ percentage. (D) After 10 days of expansion, we determined the total number of CAR-expressing Vδ2+ γδT cells and related this to the volume of blood drawn to generate this many cells (n = 8 independent donors). Error bars denote SEM. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CAR-Mediated Co-stimulation Is Essential to Allow Functional Activation of γδT Cells upon TCR Engagement (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. Anti-CD3 antibodies coupled to the surface of beads were used to activate TCR (signal 1); anti-CAR (anti-Fc) antibodies activate the CAR (signal 2) through binding the CH2CH3 linker of the CAR. (B) Representative dot plots of γδT cell analysis by flow cytometry after incubation with beads labeled with anti-CD3 and/or anti-CAR antibodies. The binding and crosslinking of a second-generation CAR is sufficient to allow full T cell activation, since both signals 1 and 2 are provided by the CAR, i.e., by the CD3ζ chain and the CD28 endodomain, respectively. According to the co-stimulation-only CAR concept, the engagement of a CAR providing only signal 2, e.g., by a DAP10 endodomain, does not lead to γδT cell activation. Only if signal 1, e.g., due to TCR activation, is provided in parallel do γδT cells become activated and respond by functional changes, e.g., IFN-γ production. (C) The engagement of a second-generation CAR, i.e., GD2-28-ζ, is sufficient to induce a profound production of pro-inflammatory IFN-γ by γδT cells. In contrast, γδT cells expressing a co-stimulation-only CAR (GD2-DAP10) produce IFN-γ only upon both TCR and CAR engagement. (D) No differences in TNF-α production were found for respective anti-CD3 and/or anti-CAR antibody-stimulated γδ T cells expressing the GD2-DAP10 or the GD2-28-ζ CAR. For (C) and (D), we performed Bonferroni post hoc analysis after one-way ANOVA. Graphs display merged results from two independent experiments (n = 4–6 independent donors). Error bars represent mean values ± SD. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cytokine Secretion by GD2-DAP10 Vδ2+ Cells Is Dependent on CD3 and CAR Engagement Cytokine production by Vδ2+ γδT cells expressing GD2-DAP10 or GD2-28-ζ CARs following 23 hr stimulation with antibody-coated beads engaging CD3, the CAR, or both. Non-transduced γδT cells (NT) are included for comparison, and CD3/CD28 bead stimulation was included as a positive control. Both the CAR and CD3 must be stimulated in order for GD2-DAP10 Vδ2+ γδT cells to produce cytokine, whereas CAR stimulation alone is sufficient to generate cytokine production by GD2-28-ζ Vδ2+ cells. Error bars indicate SEM of three independent donors. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Vδ2+ γδT Cells Expressing GD2-DAP10 CARs Kill GD2+ Tumor Cells (A and B) Specific killing of (A) neuroblastoma line LAN-1 (n = 14 independent donors for untransduced and (B) GD2+ Ewing sarcoma cell line TC-71 (n = 3 independent donors) by GD2-DAP10 CAR+. (C) This effect is not seen against the GD2− neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-SH (n = 3 independent donors). (D) The GD2-DAP10 CAR does not function in αβT cells where signal 1 is absent, indicating that the signal is restricted to the co-stimulatory pathway (n = 3 independent donors for each subgroup). Frequencies are shown as mean ± SEM; significance was determined by Bonferroni post hoc correction after two-way ANOVA, with only E:T ratio 10:1 annotated for clarity. Cytotoxicity assays were carried out at day 6 after transduction of γδT cells. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Target Cells Not Engaging the Vγ9Vδ2 Are Not Killed by GD2-DAP10 CAR Vδ2+ γδT Cells (A) The murine colonic carcinoma cell line CT26 was transduced to express human GD2 and to derive the cell line CT26-GD2. Expression of GD2 was as homogeneous as that detected for LAN-1. (B) 51Cr release assay demonstrating the ability of αβT cells expressing the GD2-28-ζ CAR to kill CT26-GD2 cells in an antigen-specific manner. Killing of wild-type CT26 and background killing by untransduced αβT cells are minimal (n = 3 independent donors for each subgroup). (C) 51Cr release assay demonstrating that Vδ2+ γδT cells expressing the GD2-28-ζ CAR kill CT26-GD2 cells in an antigen-specific manner, even though CT26 does not engage the Vδ2+ γδTCR, whereas Vδ2+ γδT cells expressing the GD2-DAP10 CAR do not (n = 7 independent donors for each subgroup). A difference for killing of CT26 target cells was also determined at an E:T ratio of 10:1 using GD2-28-ζ CAR+ cells compared to GD2-DAP10 CAR+ cells (n = 7 independent donors for each subgroup). Frequencies are shown as mean ± SEM, with significance by Bonferroni post hoc correction after two-way ANOVA; only E:T ratio 10:1 is annotated for clarity. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Expression of GD2-DAP10 CAR in Vδ2+ γδT Cells Leads to Less Exhaustion and Activation Marker Expression Than GD2-28-ζ CAR (A) Vδ2+ T cells expressing the GD2-DAP10 CAR were transduced and then maintained in medium containing 100 IU/mL IL-2 for 3 weeks. They were then washed thoroughly and co-cultured with irradiated GD2+ LAN-1 or GD2− SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells in the absence of exogenous IL-2. A combination of live cell counting by trypan blue exclusion and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis for CAR+/Vδ2+ cells was used to determine fold change over a 3-week co-culture. Only in the presence of GD2+ targets did the CAR+ cells mount a secondary expansion (n = 3 independent donors, fold change compared by paired t test at day 14 and day 20). (B) Gating to determine phenotype of CAR transduced γδT and αβT cells over prolonged culture in medium containing 100 IU/mL IL-2. Transduction efficiencies as well as the expression of TIM-3 and PD-1 were assessed by flow cytometry at each time point. Note that analysis of TIM-3 and PD-1 expression for conventional αβT cells was based on gating on Vδ2− events. Cells expressing TIM-3 and/or PD-1 were considered to have an exhausted phenotype. (C) After 10 days of culture (5 days after transduction), no significant differences were found by comparing the frequencies of exhausted events in all subgroups. Exhausted cells were defined as those expressing at least one of the exhaustion markers TIM-3 or PD-1. (D) At day 16 of culture (10 days after transduction), αβT or γδT cells expressing GD2-28-ζ CARs were more exhausted than either untransduced αβT or γδT cells. Furthermore, γδT cells expressing the GD2-28-ζ CAR were significantly more exhausted than γδT cells expressing the GD2-DAP10 CAR. As in (C), for the purposes of this analysis, cells were considered to be exhausted if they expressed TIM-3, PD-1, or both. (C) and (D) display combined results from two independent experiments (n = 5 for γδT cells and n = 6 for αβT cells) subjected to Bonferroni post hoc analysis after one-way ANOVA. Columns represent mean values ± SD. Molecular Therapy 2017 25, 1234-1247DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.002) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions