Update on work of EMMA “European marine monitoring and assessment”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICZM in Europe Jon Parker European Commission - DG Environment
Advertisements

1 policy preparation policy formulation policy execution policy evaluation Indicators The Policy Cycle.
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
Communication on "Land as a Resource" Jacques DELSALLE Head of sector Land & Soil European Commission, DG Environment FoEE Conference "Putting resource.
1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER The EEA’s needs for data and information on transitional, coastal and marine waters - proposed indicators.
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounts: A Proposed Outline and Road Map Sixth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
SEIS CV Norway November 2008 WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe with marine data (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web-site near you)
Towards a future Maritime Policy for the Union: Martin F. Diez-Picazo Martime Policy Task Force - European Commission.
Biofuels – EU policy context Funding and Legislation Workshops Glasgow, 26 May 2011 Francesca Giannini Scotland Europa.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
European Commission “Intelligent Energy for Europe”
Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Monitoring and assessment “needs” of the European Marine Strategy
The EU Strategy and Action Plan for customs risk management
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Questions for break-out sessions GROUP 2 messages Participants : state administrations in charge of MSFD and/or WFD, ESA and GES experts, shipping industry,
Climate Change and River Basin Planning
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
EEA–EMMA Workshop November 2006
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
MIG-T meeting, 19th April 2016, Ispra End-user applications
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
Synthesis of EEA-led EMMA workshops on:
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.1 Coping with climate change European Commission Research.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Monitoring and assessment “needs” of the European Marine Strategy
WFD “case study” Gert Verreet – DG Environment, Unit D.2 marine team
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
River Basin Management Plans
Monitoring and assessment “needs” of the European Marine Strategy
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
WS1: Overall remarks plenary
Monitoring and assessment of the marine environment under the European Marine Strategy Introduction The European Union is highly dependent on maritime.
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
Information on projects
Trine Christiansen Constanca Belchior
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
EEA support to the wider marine assessments in the MSFD: European & regional marine indicator convergence Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine Assessments.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Implementation EU White Paper Climate Change Adaptation Specific actions DG Environment Feedback from Expert Group Climate change and water Jacques Delsalle.
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
European Marine Strategy
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Environmental Accounts and Indicators
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Projects under Pillar I of White Paper on Climate Change Adaptation
River Basin Management Plans
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Update on work of EMMA “European marine monitoring and assessment” Introduction The European Union is highly dependent on maritime transport. Around 90% of its external trade and 40% of its internal trade goes by sea. For most inter continental trade, shipping is of course the only feasible option. World trade is growing and as a result so is EU shipping. Trade has consistently grown at a faster rate than the world economy for the last six decades. In view of the scale of current and predicted activity, it is inevitable that concerns arise about its impact on the environment. The development of short sea shipping is seen as a central element of the strategy for a European transport system set out in the Commission’s 2001 transport White Paper which seeks to encourage use of more environmentally benign modes of transport. The view is often stated that in order to reduce pollution and ease congestion on the roads, shipping should be encouraged. This may well be true, with a number of caveats. Firstly that using the sea should not lead to further growth in demand to distribute the goods by road, secondly that shipping actually should result in lower pollutant emissions. On the positive side it should be noted that where shipping substitutes for road transport, its low energy use per tonne-km helps to reduce fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions. As with all modes of transport the external effects from shipping vary. The Commission has a long standing policy of seeking to ensure that all modes of transport pay their external costs, and there is of course every reason why this should also be implemented in the maritime sector. So we can see that shipping does offer potential for satisfying a proportion of transport demand in a way that offers some environmental benefits. However, in doing so, there are environmental concerns that need to be addressed. In addition if capacity is to be expanded it will give rise to additional environmental pressures. Gert Verreet – DG Environment, Unit D.2 marine team With thanks to Eva Royo Gelabert – EEA 29 November 2006

European Marine Monitoring and Assessment (EMMA) One of the four working groups established to elaborate the Strategy, only one currently still active Jointly operated by DG ENV and the EEA (co-chairs) Most recent (6th) plenary meeting 3-4 April.

EMMA last meeting and roadmap Main aim April 2006 meeting: Developing EMMA roadmap to facilitate, in particular, arriving at the “initial assessment” under the MSD Common understanding  Beneficial to “converge” towards a common set of indicators to support pan-European marine assessments, including for MSD implementation Lot of scope of making the most of what exists, and assisting others in doing the same in terms of marine monitoring and assessment

EEA main activities to fulfil “active” EMMA roadmap objectives “Convergence” of assessments (i.e. moving in the same direction to support the MSD “initial assessment”) Compiling information of existing indicators: Written process with support from Conventions/countries Preliminary analysis to be used in workshops Report to EMMA Plenary 2007 to be advised on “next steps”  How to continue in order to develop a common set of pan-European indicators to be complemented regionally by +/- 2008? Outcomes probably revised after MSD enters into force

Workshops EEA-led EMMA workshops 2006/7 to foster networking towards streamlined monitoring and data collection Operational oceanography: 23-24 October 2006 (to increase dialogue between “users” and “producers” of operational oceanography products) Ecological processes/biological elements: 20-21 November 2006 (we have great “needs”, what can we use already?) Chemical loads and burdens: 17-18 April 2007 (we have been doing this for some time now, how to take it a step further?)

Main outcomes “Operational oceanography” workshop (1) Substantial infrastructure for operational oceanography exists Operational oceanography products are mainly linked to the assessment needs under 3 themes: Physical characteristics of European seas (e.g. temperature, salinity), including climate change impacts (e.g. sea level) Oil pollution Eutrophication (e.g. nutrients, chlorophyll) Products for assessments related to number 1 and 2 are fit for purpose and can already be delivered.

Main outcomes “Operational oceanography” workshop (2) Transition from research to operational monitoring Big current opportunity to shape the process Need to: Continue dialogue between “users” (e.g. regional sea Conventions) and “producers”, and extend it to agreements on services Build end to end demonstrations in the 3 relevant assessment themes into the Marine Core Services and downstream service chains, and validate their performance.

Main outcomes “Ecology / biology” workshop (1) Reviewed existence of ‘indicators’ for biological and ecological elements in MSD Annex II, concluded that geographical gaps (in convention areas) are in generally being closed, but not all quality elements are monitored/assessed on a pan-European level. MSD Annex II mixes characteristics and pressures and impacts – this need to be sorted out in the process of the adoption of the Directive

Main outcomes “Ecology / biology” workshop (2) Catchment activities and coastal issues should be taken care of via revelant process (ND, UWWTD, WFD) but the result should never be decoupled from marine risk assessments and state of the marine environment assessments activities (= ecosystem approach to management of human activities) Foresee a close dialogue with the regional conventions – these institutions are already coordinating “input issues”, “coastal issues” and truly “marine issues”

Main outcomes “Ecology / biology” workshop (3) Scope for better utilisation of efforts undertaken for ecological characterisation of coastal waters under WFD, and for nature conservation (for certain quality elements) under Habitats & Birds Directives Scope for relation with data generated under fisheries policy Scope exists also for improving indicators in areas where regulatory assessment methods have advanced (e.g. eutrophication, EU water policy and conventions).

Next meeting of EMMA End of May 2007 Agenda elements likely to include: Working on results and recommendations of workshops Data management (« WISE-Marine ») Concrete synergies?