Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e7 (September 2017)
A Role for PML3 in Centrosome Duplication and Genome Stability
MCM8 Is an MCM2-7-Related Protein that Functions as a DNA Helicase during Replication Elongation and Not Initiation  Domenico Maiorano, Olivier Cuvier,
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Seung-Hwan Kim, W. Matthew Michael  Molecular Cell 
Cdk2 Kinase Is Required for Entry into Mitosis as a Positive Regulator of Cdc2–Cyclin B Kinase Activity  Thomas M Guadagno, John W Newport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e7 (September 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Origin recognition complex binding to a metazoan replication origin
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Ben Hodgson, Anatoliy Li, Shusuke Tada, J. Julian Blow  Current Biology 
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Cdc45 Is a Critical Effector of Myc-Dependent DNA Replication Stress
Ivar Ilves, Tatjana Petojevic, James J. Pesavento, Michael R. Botchan 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Jianbo Yue, James E. Ferrell  Current Biology 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication
Ken-ichi Yoshioka, Yoshiko Yoshioka, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Interleukin-6-Resistant Melanoma Cells Exhibit Reduced Activation of STAT3 and Lack of Inhibition of Cyclin E-Associated Kinase Activity  Markus Böhm,
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Activation of DSB Processing Requires Phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR
A Role for the MRN Complex in ATR Activation via TOPBP1 Recruitment
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
Claspin, a Novel Protein Required for the Activation of Chk1 during a DNA Replication Checkpoint Response in Xenopus Egg Extracts  Akiko Kumagai, William.
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
GTP Hydrolysis by Ran Is Required for Nuclear Envelope Assembly
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Human Pre-mRNA Cleavage Factor Im Is Related to Spliceosomal SR Proteins and Can Be Reconstituted In Vitro from Recombinant Subunits  Ursula Rüegsegger,
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Ultraviolet-B-Induced G1 Arrest is Mediated by Downregulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 in Transformed Keratinocytes Lacking Functional p53  Arianna.
Role for cyclin-dependent kinase 2 in mitosis exit
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 137-147 (July 2001) Mre11 Protein Complex Prevents Double-Strand Break Accumulation during Chromosomal DNA Replication  Vincenzo Costanzo, Kirsten Robertson, Marina Bibikova, Edward Kim, Domenico Grieco, Max Gottesman, Dana Carroll, Jean Gautier  Molecular Cell  Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 137-147 (July 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5

Figure 1 X-Mre11 Is Homologous to Human Mre11 The deduced amino acid sequence of Xenopus Mre11 was aligned with the sequence of the human Mre11 protein using the Geneworks program (Intellegenetics). Amino acid identities are boxed in yellow Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 2 X-Mre11 Is Phosphorylated in a DSBs-Dependent, ATM-Independent Manner (A) Untreated interphase extract (Control), extract incubated with protein A beads bound to preimmune serum (PRE), and extract incubated with protein A beads bound to anti-X-Mre11 antibodies (X-Mre11 Ab) were probed with a polyclonal serum specific for X-Mre11 protein. (B) Left panel. X-Mre11 was immunoprecipitated from extracts containing either uncut plasmid (lanes 1 and 2) or DNA containing double strand breaks (DSBs) (lanes 3 and 4; see Experimental Procedures). In lanes 2 and 4, the proteins were treated with λ phosphatase (+). Arrows on the left indicate X-Mre11 isoforms. Right panel. Xenopus interphase extracts were labeled with γ32P-ATP, immunoprecipitated with preimmune (PRE) or anti-X-Mre11 antibodies (Mre11 Ab) in presence of DSBs and processed for autoradiography following SDS-PAGE. (C) Xenopus extracts were subjected to PAGE followed by Western blotting with X-Mre11-specific antibody. Interphase extracts were either treated with circular plasmid (uncut plasmid) or with DSBs. Extracts treated with DSBs were incubated with 5 mM caffeine (caffeine) or anti-X-ATM antibodies (ATM Ab), as indicated. Arrows on the left indicate X-Mre11 isoforms Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 3 X-Mre11 Exonuclease Activity Is Regulated by DSB-Induced Phosphorylation X-Mre11 was immunoprecipitated from interphase extracts and incubated with labeled oligonucleotide substrate (see Experimental Procedures) for 60 min. Mre11 exonuclease activity was measured by the amount of degraded substrate. Mre11 exonuclease activity is expressed in arbitrary units; uninduced activity = 1. The first column represents the uninduced activity of X-Mre11 precipitated from an extract treated with circular plasmid (Control). Columns 2 and 3 represent the activity of X-Mre11 precipitated from an extract treated with DSBs or DSBs and caffeine (DSBs + caffeine), respectively. Column 4 represents the activity of X-Mre11 precipitated from a DSB-treated extract that was subsequently treated with λ phosphatase. The data presented are from three independent experiments Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 4 X-Mre11 Is Phosphorylated during DNA Replication, and Is Not Required for DNA Replication Initiation or Elongation (A) Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions (see Experimental Procedures) were analyzed by Western blot with anti-X-Mre11 antibodies under the following conditions. Cytoplasm was purified after 90 min incubation with nuclei in the presence of tautomycin (lane 1). Nuclei were incubated for 0, 60, and 90 min in untreated interphase extracts (lanes 2–4). Nuclei were incubated for 60 and 90 min in extracts to which tautomycin was added at 30 min following addition of nuclei (lanes 5 and 6). Nuclei were incubated for 60 and 90 min in extracts treated with tautomycin and caffeine (lanes 7 and 8). Nuclei were incubated for 60 and 90 min in cdc6-depleted extracts in the presence of tautomycin (lanes 9 and 10). (B) Genomic DNA replication was monitored by 30 min pulses of α-32P-ATP. Incorporation into chromatin incubated with untreated extract (Control), extract incubated with protein A beads bound to preimmune serum (Mock-depleted), or extract incubated with protein A beads bound to anti-X-Mre11 antibodies (Mre11 complex-depleted) Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 5 X-Mre11 Prevents the Accumulation of DSBs that Arise during DNA Replication (A–C) DSBs were detected by TUNEL assay measuring incorporation of γ32P-dGTP into genomic DNA. (A) Labeling of prereplicative nuclei (columns 1 and 2), postreplicative nuclei isolated from a control extract (columns 3 and 4), a mock-depleted extract (columns 5 and 6), and a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extract (columns 7 and 8). Controls were incubated without terminal transferase (No TdT, columns 1, 3, 5, and 7). Nuclei replicated in X-Mre11 depleted extracts were purified and incubated with TdT in the presence of 500 nM Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex (column 9). Labeling of postreplicative nuclei replicated in X-Mre11 complex-depleted extracts in the presence of aphidicolin (column 10). (B) Labeling of nuclei replicated in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extracts (column 1) and in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extract supplemented with 500 nM human Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (Paull and Gellert, 1999) recombinant complex prior to replication (column 2). Labeling of nuclei during replication in untreated extracts at 30 min (column 3), 60 min (column 4), and 90 min (column 5). Labeling of nuclei incubated in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extracts in which DNA replication was inhibited by 6DMAP (column 6), by Cdc6-depletion (column 7), or by addition of actinomycin D (column 8). (C) Labeling of nuclei replicated in X-Mre11 complex-depleted extracts (column 1) and in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extract in the presence of ZVAD. Labeling of nuclei partially digested with Not1 (column 3). Labeling of nuclei incubated in extract in the presence of cytochrome C (column 4). (D) Cleavage of radiolabeled tPARP in various extracts. tPARP cleavage in normal extracts (Control), extracts treated with preimmune serum (PRE), X-Mre11-depleted extracts (Depleted), and in Cytochrome C-treated extracts (Cyto C). (E) Chromatin fractions were analyzed by Western blot with γ-H2AX antibodies under the following conditions: Left panel. Chromatin partially digested with Not1 (lane 1). Chromatin extracted from nuclei replicated in a control extract (lane 2), a mock-depleted extract (lane 3), and a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extract (lane 4). Right panel. Chromatin extracted from nuclei replicated in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extract (lane 1) and in a X-Mre11 complex-depleted extracts supplemented with increasing amounts of human Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 recombinant complex (lanes 2: 125 nM, 3: 250 nM and 4: 500 nM). Chromatin extracted from nuclei incubated in Cdc6-depleted extract (lane 5) Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 6 X-Mre11 Is Not Required for the DSB-Induced, ATM-Dependent Checkpoint DNA replication was assayed in reconstituted extracts consisting of 6-DMAP-treated chromatin and fractions M and B prepared from different sources as indicated. Fractions M and B are derived from extracts treated with circular plasmid DNA. Fractions M* and B* are derived from extracts treated with DSBs. M and B (lanes 3 and 4), as well as M* and B* fractions (lanes 5–8), were prepared from extracts in which X-ATM was inhibited with specific antibodies (X-ATM, lanes 7–8) or extracts in which X-Mre11 complex was depleted (X-Mre11 Ab, lanes 4, 6, and 8), as indicated Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)

Figure 7 Our Preferred Model for Mre11 Function in DNA Synthesis and the Response to DNA Damage (1) Top half: Mre11 prevents the accumulation of DSBs during DNA replication. DNA DSBs can arise following external DNA damage or as a consequence of DNA replication. (2) Bottom half: proposed role for the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex in the maintenance of the DNA damage checkpoint. DSBs activate the ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway leading to cdk2 inactivation and inhibition of DNA replication initiation (Costanzo et al., 2000). DSBs also trigger the activation of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex through both ATM-dependent and independent phosphorylation. The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex is essential for the repair of DSBs. We hypothesize that Mre11-driven repair reinforces the ATM-dependent checkpoint (possibly through Nbs1 function) and maintains this checkpoint signaling active during repair. After DSB repair, Mre11 complex is no longer hyperphosphorylated; DNA repair and the ATM-dependent checkpoint are downregulated Molecular Cell 2001 8, 137-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00294-5)