Explicit feedback with sounding packet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1829r1 Submission November 2006 Assaf Kasher et al. (Intel)Slide 1 Heff Defintion Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Advertisements

Coexistence Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Explicit feedback with sounding packet
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
March 2014 Election Results
Legacy OFDM Transmission on several Antennas
Explicit feedback with sounding packet
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Scaling and Quantization for CSI Matrices Feedback
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006
Protection Assurance Method
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Number of Encoder as a function of MCS
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
PHY CID 3242 Date: Authors: September 2007 September 2007
PHY Ad Hoc September Opening Report
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
TGn LB84 – Frame Format Ad Hoc Status and Motions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Coex Ad Hoc January London Agenda and Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Benefits of Compressed Explicit feedback to resolve CID 2969
PHY Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
PHY CID 3242 Date: Authors: September 2007 September 2007
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
PSMP Adhoc Oct TGn Adhoc
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions for LB 84 Comment Resolutions
Explicit feedback with sounding packet
TGn LB84 – Frame Format Ad Hoc Motions
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2006 Month Year
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Explicit feedback with sounding packet May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0xxxr0 July 2006 Explicit feedback with sounding packet Date: 2006-07-17 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

CIDs to cover in LB84 comments July 2006 CIDs to cover in LB84 comments CID numbers to cover 11959, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 4144, 1072, 952, 4145, 10286, 954, 4147, 957, 4150, 969, 1073, 4161, 968, 970, 4526, 2697 Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

July 2006 Current draft D1.0 Current draft D1.0 has conflicts in PHY and MAC sections In 9.20.3.3 (Page 124, line 15), the sequence is initiated by an AP which sends an un-steered sounding PPDU for CSI feedback request. We don’t have this issue anymore with 06/886r2 accepted. In 20.3.6.3 (Page 221, Line 16), when using a spatial mapping matrix Qk , it needs an estimate of the effective channel HkQk , where Qk is in this case a NtxxNSTS orthonormal spatial mapping matrix. The sounding PPDU sounds the effective channel that includes spatial mapping matrix Qk at the transmitter. Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

July 2006 Definitions H_eff: a transfer function from the transmitter inner CDD input to the receiver FFT outputs (CID 3962) H_eff = HQCcsd Ccsd is CDD block between STBC and Spatial Mapping block in Figure n51 Q: Spatial mapping matrix used at beamformer It can be either direct mapping, spatial expansion or beamforming steering matrix Q_steer: Steering matrix used for beamformed packet transmission (special name of Q only if Q is used for steering matrix) Q_steer = QV V: Beamforming feedback matrix to be fedback from beamformee to beamformer Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

The explicit feedback with current sounding packet July 2006 The explicit feedback with current sounding packet We may have a spatial mapping matrix, Q, for sounding packet in the explicit feedback Beamformee may estimate the channel, where the measured channel includes Q and Ccsd, to feedback either the full effective channel or beamforming matrix V. Ccsd is CDD block between STBC and Spatial Mapping block in Figure n51 Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

July 2006 Proposed solution Beamformee may return HQCcsd for full channel feedback (CSI feedback), or V for beamforming matrix feedback where V is found from HQ (Uncompressed/Compressed V feedback). CSI feedback When Beamformee sends back the measured channel, the measured channel includes the Q matrix, which is used in the sounding packet, as well as Ccsd. We should define Heff = HQCcsd, which is the effective channel including the spatial mapping matrix and inner CDD (CID 11959, 952, 4145, 10286, 3962,11979) Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

Proposed solution (cont.) July 2006 Proposed solution (cont.) V matrix feedback (either compressed or uncompressed) The beamformee removes the CSD in table n67 from the measured channel matrix before it determines the beamforming feedback matrix V. The beamformee sends back V and Beamformer needs to modify it to account for Q which is originally used in the sounding packet. We introduce Q_steer. (CID 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 4144, 1072, 954, 4147, 957, 4150, 969, 1073, 4161, 968, 970) The beamformer shall use Q_steer = QV for new steering matrix by multiplying fedback V with the original Q used in the sounding packet. H_eff x Ccsd*= HQ = USV* for the example of SVD operation HQQ*QV = USV*Q*QV  HQV = HQ_steer = US Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

Conclusions We can resolve it by introducing Heff and Qsteer. July 2006 Conclusions We can resolve it by introducing Heff and Qsteer. Heff includes Q and Ccsd for CSI feedback. Qsteer is a special name of Q, when Q is used as a beamforming steering matrix. Beamforming matrix V is found from Heff Ccsd* for the feedback, and Qsteer = QV is new steering matrix for beamformed packets. Normative text is provided in 06/1335 Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

Proposal for Heff Measured channel is HQCcsd July 2006 Proposal for Heff Measured channel is HQCcsd For CSI feedback, the measured channel Heff, where Heff = HQCcsd,, will be fedback. For Uncompressed and Compressed feedback, the beamformee strips out Ccsd from the measured channel before it finds the beamforming matrix V for feedback. The beamformer applies new steering matrix Q_steer = QV, where Q is the spatial mapping matrix used for the sounding packet. Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom

July 2006 References 11-06-0675-035-000n-tgn-d1-0-lb84-beamforming-and-adapation.xls Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom