Memory and behavior: a second generation of genetically modified mice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Advertisements

Dmitriy Aronov, David W. Tank  Neuron 
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Spatial representation and the architecture of the entorhinal cortex
In Vivo Imaging of Dentate Gyrus Mossy Cells in Behaving Mice
Hiroaki Norimoto, Yuji Ikegaya  Current Biology 
Michael S. Fanselow, Hong-Wei Dong  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Behavioral architecture of the cortical sheet
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Masahiro Yasuda, Mark R. Mayford  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages R620-R621 (July 2014)
Hill-Aina Steffenach, Menno Witter, May-Britt Moser, Edvard I. Moser 
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Trajectory Encoding in the Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex
Kenji Mizuseki, György Buzsáki  Cell Reports 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Single Units in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex with Anxiety-Related Firing Patterns Are Preferentially Influenced by Ventral Hippocampal Activity  Avishek.
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Posterior parietal cortex
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Inversely Active Striatal Projection Neurons and Interneurons Selectively Delimit Useful Behavioral Sequences  Nuné Martiros, Alexandra A. Burgess, Ann.
Functional Split between Parietal and Entorhinal Cortices in the Rat
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)
Annabelle C. Singer, Loren M. Frank  Neuron 
Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages e6 (March 2017)
Neuroscience: Out of Sight but Not Out of Mind
Brain Imaging: Decoding Your Memories
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Representation of Geometric Borders in the Developing Rat
What do grid cells contribute to place cell firing?
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Sleep-Stage-Specific Regulation of Cortical Excitation and Inhibition
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (December 2000)
Place, space and memory cells
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages R1116-R1121 (December 2015)
A Quarter of a Century of Place Cells
Subregion- and Cell Type–Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
New and Distinct Hippocampal Place Codes Are Generated in a New Environment during Septal Inactivation  Mark P. Brandon, Julie Koenig, Jill K. Leutgeb,
Patricio T Huerta, Linus D Sun, Matthew A Wilson, Susumu Tonegawa 
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
On the Integration of Space, Time, and Memory
Repeating Spatial Activations in Human Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Bálint Lasztóczi, Thomas Klausberger  Neuron 
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Fabian Chersi, Neil Burgess  Neuron 
Spatial Representation along the Proximodistal Axis of CA1
Volume 28, Issue 13, Pages e5 (July 2018)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Francesca Cacucci, Patricia Salinas, Thomas J. Wills  Current Biology 
Behavioral architecture of the cortical sheet
Presentation transcript:

Memory and behavior: a second generation of genetically modified mice Mark Mayford, Isabelle M Mansuy, Robert U Muller, Eric R Kandel  Current Biology  Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages R580-R589 (September 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9 Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A comparison of the medial temporal lobe system in rodents, primates, and humans. At the top is shown the lateral surface of the rat brain, the ventral surface of the monkey brain and the medial surface of the human brain. Below each of these views of the brain is an unfolded two-dimensional map of the entorhinal cortex, the perirhinal cortex and the parahippocampal postrhinal cortices. As these comparisons illustrate, rodents, primates, and humans have an organization of their medial temporal lobe structures that is largely conserved among mammals [6]. Abbreviations: R, rostral; C, caudal; D, dorsal; V, ventral. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The flow of information in the medial temporal memory system in primates [6]. This extended view of the medial temporal lobe system emphasizes the importance of the direct projects from layers II and III of the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the CA3, CA1 and subicular regions. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Regional specificity of transgene expression with the CaMKIIα promoter [16]. Regional distribution of the CaMKII-Asp286 transgene mRNA when expressed under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter alone (a) or in combination with the tTA system (b). In (a), the CaMKII-Asp286 transgene is expressed in areas CA1, CA2 and CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) in the hippocampus, and in neocortex (Ctx), striatum (Str), amygdala (Amy) and subiculum (Sub). In (b), expression is found only in CA1 and dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, and in striatum and amygdala. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Regional specificity of gene knockout with the CaMKIIα promoter in combination with Cre–loxP system. (a) Strategy used to obtain CA1-restricted gene knockout. Two independent lines of transgenic mice are generated: mouse 1 carries the CaMKIIα promoter fused to the Cre transgene; in mouse 2, the gene of interest is flanked by two loxP sequences. The transgene is introduced into the mouse with the loxP-flanked gene through mating. In mice carrying both genetic modifications (mouse 1 + 2), the loxP-flanked sequence is deleted only in the CA1 neurons. (b,c) Pattern of recombination in a ‘reporter’ mouse carrying the CaMKIIα promoter-Cre transgene and a lacZ gene that is interrupted by a stop sequence flanked by two loxP sequences. In this reporter mouse, recombination by Cre removes the stop sequence that prevents lacZ from being expressed. (b) Sagittal section of a 28 day-old mouse brain showing blue staining (X-gal) in CA1 pyramidal cells in the hippocampus that indicates recombination in these cells (I.M.M., M.M. and E.R.K., unpublished results). (c) High-magnification view of the hippocampus. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Temporal and regional expression of the CaMKII-Asp286 transgene with the tTA system. (a) Strategy used to obtain forebrain-specific transgene expression regulated by doxycycline. Mouse 1 carries the CaMKIIα promoter fused to the tTA transgene; mouse 2 carries the tetO promoter fused to the CaMKII-Asp286 transgene. The two transgenes are introduced into a single mouse through mating. (b) The memory task undertaken by the mice –  the spatial version of the Barnes maze. This circular maze has 40 holes in the perimeter and a hidden escape tunnel under one of the holes. The mouse is placed in the center of the maze and motivated to escape by bright lights and an aversive buzzer. To find the tunnel, the mouse needs to remember and use the relationships among the distal cues in the environment. To achieve the learning criterion on this task, the mouse must make three or less errors across five out of six consecutive trials. Errors are defined as searching any hole that did not have a tunnel beneath it. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Place cell recordings from mice (modified from [42]). (a) The recording setup. A mouse is trained to run all over the floor of a 49 cm diameter cylinder. Recordings are simultaneously made of the spike activity of one or more pyramidal cells and of the position of the mouse's head in the environment. Tracking is done with an overhead TV camera whose signal is fed to a detector that digitizes the position of a light on the mouse's head. (b) The positional firing patterns of three place cells recorded sequentially for 16 min each from one wild-type mouse. The circles are overhead views of the cylinder, and color represents the firing rate in each small square region (pixel). The cell's firing field is the darkly colored region. When the animal's head is in this region, the cell fires approximately 10 spikes/sec. Outside the firing field, the discharge rate is virtually zero as indicated by the yellow pixels. Thus, the positional signal is extremely strong. Note that the firing fields of the example cells are in different places in the environment. If many cells were shown, it would be clear that the fields cover the surface of the cylinder. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Single place cells repeatedly recorded from wild-type and CaMKII-Asp286 transgenic mice [42]. The four 16 min recording sessions in the top row for the wild-type mouse were done in two pairs. Sessions 1 and 2 were done within 2 min of each other, without removing the mouse from the cylinder. Similarly, sessions 3 and 4 were done within 2 min of each other, again with the mouse continuously present in the cylinder. Between sessions 2 and 3, however, the mouse was removed from the cylinder for about 1 h before being replaced. Note that the position of the firing field is constant at about 10:30 o’clock across all four sessions. When the same time sequence of four recording sessions is repeated in a CaMKII-Asp286 transgenic mouse, the firing field moves from position to position between sessions. In this example, the charge in field position was greater after the mouse was removed from and replaced into the apparatus than for session pairs done at 2 min intervals. Over many cells, however, the instability was about the same for session pairs separated by minutes or by an hour. Current Biology 1997 7, R580-R589DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00287-9) Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions