Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Advertisements

Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
The Architecture of Restriction Enzymes
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (July 2006)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of the Human Dicer-TRBP Complex by Electron Microscopy
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Structural Basis of Pore Formation by the Bacterial Toxin Pneumolysin
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Katharina Hipp, Clemens Grimm, Holger Jeske, Bettina Böttcher 
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Gang Cai, Tsuyoshi Imasaki, Yuichiro Takagi, Francisco J. Asturias 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Structural Basis for Cooperative DNA Binding by CAP and Lac Repressor
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Qing Yao, Sara J. Weaver, Jee-Young Mock, Grant J. Jensen  Structure 
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1848-1858 (October 2013) Allosteric Regulation of DNA Cleavage and Sequence-Specificity through Run-On Oligomerization  Dmitry Lyumkis, Heather Talley, Andrew Stewart, Santosh Shah, Chad K. Park, Florence Tama, Clinton S. Potter, Bridget Carragher, Nancy C. Horton  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1848-1858 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2013 21, 1848-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SgrAI Forms Run-On Oligomers in the Presence of Activating DNA (A and B) 2D class averages and corresponding 3D EM density maps created by the random-conical tilt reconstruction strategy are displayed for (A) a single SgrAI DBD with the corresponding crystal structure (Dunten et al., 2008) displayed above, and subsequently for (B) elongating oligomers. Scale bars represent 150 Å. ∗The 3-DBD oligomers adopt an alternative orientation on the EM grid and, their 3D maps are therefore rotated to correspond to the 2D average. (C) Oligomer size distribution within the negative stain data set; the x axis indicates the number of DBDs represented by a single oligomer identified by 2D classification; the y axis indicates the percentage of particles within the full data set corresponding to each DBD grouping, and in parentheses, the absolute number of particles. See also Figure S1 and Table S2. Structure 2013 21, 1848-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of Activated and Oligomeric SgrAI (A) Top and side views showing the organization of helical asymmetric units (DBDs) within the SgrAI oligomers. Eight distinct DBDs have been segmented out of the cryo-EM map and are each colored differently. (B) Helical reconstruction of oligomeric SgrAI at 8.6 Å resolution, segmented into 11 individual DBDs and labeled by helical asymmetric unit. Protein components of units 1,4,6,7,9 and 2,3,5,8,10,11 are shaded light and dark, respectively. (C) Segmentation and different views of an individual helical asymmetric unit. Each helical asymmetric unit contains two monomeric SgrAI protein subunits (colored light and dark orange), and two copies of precleaved DNA (both colored blue). (D) Flexibly fit coordinates of SgrAI (Dunten et al., 2008) into the EM density of a segmented helical asymmetric unit. Arrows mark DNA disorder in the terminal regions. Scale bar is 150 Å. See also Figures S2 and S3 and Movie S1. Structure 2013 21, 1848-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A Conformational Rearrangement Establishes Oligomer-Specific Interactions within Activated SgrAI (A) Three different views of the crystal structure 3DVO (green; Dunten et al., 2008) are shown overlaid on the flexibly fit coordinates of oligomeric SgrAI (orange). For each DBD, arrows diagram approximate movement from the starting to the ending structure (see also Movie S2). (B) Surface electrostatic potential of a SgrAI DBD. (C) Close-up view of protein-DNA interactions within SgrAI’s allosteric DNA-binding site, as seen from the outside of the helix (inset). Protein loops 56–60 and 122–140, which are unique to SgrAI, are shown interacting in the vicinity of flanking bp 3–5 and 6–9, respectively (numbered along one DNA strand), and along the minor groove of the DNA. (D) Comparison of the fit oligomeric PC-DNA with idealized B-form DNA. Oligomeric and B-form DNAs are overlaid on the EM density in mesh. Cleavage sites forming the two precleaved DNAs are marked by arrows. Stars indicate the site of allosteric protein-DNA interaction. (E) Close-up view of SgrAI’s N-terminal interactions, as seen from the inside of the helix (inset). The N terminus of DBD(n) makes apparent interactions with a portion of the N-terminal loop (aa 21–30) of DBD(n+1). See also Figure S4, Table S1, and Movie S2. Structure 2013 21, 1848-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model of SgrAI DNA-Bound Dimer Activation and Enzymatic Function SgrAI DBDs contain, at a minimum, two conformational states, which account for an inactive, or minimally active (red), and an active (green) enzymatic state. The two exist in equilibrium, the extent of which is dependent upon whether (A) primary site (blue) or (B and C) secondary site (yellow) DNA is bound. DNA recognition sites are displayed underneath, with the varying nucleotide in red. In the active, dimeric form, both primary and secondary site DNA can undergo cleavage at a slow rate that is determined by the frequency of occupation of the active state. (A) Primary site DBDs can initiate oligomerization, and they can do so with any DBD and regardless of the bound DNA sequence. (B) Secondary site DBDs can join an oligomer containing primary site DBDs. Oligomerization in turn stabilizes the activated conformation and facilitates attachment of additional DBDs, enabling DNA cleavage acceleration (A and B) and/or sequence-specificity expansion (B). To differentiate the distinct subunits, active and stabilized DBDs within the oligomer are shaded differently, although all are presumed to maintain equal activity. (C) Secondary-site DBDs cannot undergo oligomerization by themselves, and higher order species are not observed, although it is possible that transient oligomerzation occurs, but is undetectable under the experimental reaction conditions. The Discussion section provides further mechanistic details. Structure 2013 21, 1848-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.012) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions