Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
The Structure of HLA-DM, the Peptide Exchange Catalyst that Loads Antigen onto Class II MHC Molecules during Antigen Presentation  Lidia Mosyak, Dennis.
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
A Proposed Structure for Transmembrane Segment 7 of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Incorporating an Asn-Pro/Asp-Pro Motif  Karel Konvicka, Frank Guarnieri,
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Structural Analysis of Engineered Bb Fragment of Complement Factor B
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on SDF-1α: Binding with CXCR4 Receptor
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Marcos Sotomayor, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
What Does It Take to Bind CAR?
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Andrey V Kajava, Gilbert Vassart, Shoshana J Wodak  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize, Henry I. Mosberg  Biophysical Journal  Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 612-634 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6 Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence alignment of transmembrane helices (TMH I–TMH VII) and extracellular loops (EL-1, EL-2, EL-3) of human δ, μ, and κ receptors. Asterisks above the sequences for each helix indicate the 26-residue transmembrane segments, identified by Baldwin (1993) and used for identification of GPCR residues as the number of helix (Roman numerals):number of residue in the 26-residue fragment (Arabic numerals). For example, Asp128 in the δ-receptor sequence is denoted as III:7. Numbering of the μ receptor is that of the rat receptor for consistency with mutagenesis data. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structures of nonpeptide opioid ligands. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Superposition of structures of DIANA-calculated δ (bold line), μ (thin line), and κ (dashed line) receptors (stereo view). The r.m.s.d. between 212Cα atoms of transmembrane helices of δ and μ, δ and κ, and μ and κ receptors are 0.74, 0.80, and 0.90Å, respectively. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cartoon representation of transmembrane helices and extracellular loops of δ-opioid receptors with JOM-13, side view and top view from the extracellular surface. Helical fragments are purple, loop fragments are white, the β-turn is orange, the disulfide bridge between helix III and EL-2 (residues Cys121–Cys198) is yellow, and JOM-13 is green. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Proposed structure of the β-hairpin in EL-2 of the μ opioid receptor with proximal H-bonded polar residues from helices III and VII and from EL-3 and conserved disulfide bond between Cys140(III:0) and Cys217(EL-2). H-bonds are indicated by the dashed line. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 H-bond network of the μ opioid receptor (stereo view). Colors of residues depicted: green, Tyr, Trp; red, Asp, Glu; blue, His, Lys; yellow, Ser, Thr, Asn, Gln. The receptor is shown with morphine (purple) in the binding site. H-bonds are indicated by the dashed line. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of the δ-opioid receptor model transmembrane α-bundle (blue) and the EM-based model of Baldwin et al. (Baldwin, 1997) (red) (stereo view). Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 JOM-13 (bold line) inside the binding pocket of the δ-opioid receptor (stereo view). Conserved (thin solid line) and variable (thin dashed line) residues of the binding pocket (within 4.5Å of the ligand) are also shown. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Superposition of δ and μ receptor models with inserted JOM-13 (dark purple) and JH-42 (dark green), respectively (stereo view). Receptor residues that are within 4.5Å of the ligands and are different in δ and μ receptors are shown in light purple and light green, respectively. Lys214(233) is also shown, because it assumes different side-chain conformers in the δ and μ receptors. Numbering in the figure corresponds to the δ receptor. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Two positions (solid and dashed lines) of (−)-morphine in the binding pocket of the μ-opioid receptor (stereo view). The ligand is denoted by the bold line, and receptor residues within 4.5Å of the ligand by the thin line. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 The δ-selective agonist BW373U86 (bold line) inside the binding pocket of the δ-opioid receptor (stereo view). Conserved (thin solid line) and variable (thin dashed line) residues of the binding pocket (within 4.5Å of the ligand) are also shown. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 Two conformations of cis-(+)-3-methylfentanyl (B, dashed line; C, solid line) in the μ-opioid receptor (stereo view). The ligand is denoted by the bold line, and receptor residues within 4.5Å of the ligand by the thin line. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 The κ-selective alkaloid agonist U69,593 (bold) in the binding pocket of the κ-opioid receptor (stereo view). Conserved (thin solid line) and variable (thin dashed line) residues of the binding pocket within 4.5Å of the ligand are also shown. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 612-634DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77552-6) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions