STATE v. KINGMAN 463 P.2d 638 (Wash. 1970)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Advertisements

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SCHAFER Supreme Court of Washington, 149 Wash.2d 148,
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In the Matter of Stanley R. JUHNKE Kansas Supreme Court, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. JIMENEZ RECIO 537 U.S. 270 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. Willard JOHNSON U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 327 F.3d 554 (2003) Case Brief.
EOC Judicial – Systems / Structures
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. BUTLER 19 Ohio St.2d 55, 249 N.E.2d 818 (1969) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. TWEEDY, Supreme Court of Oklahoma 2000.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. DECK v. MISSOURI 125 S.Ct (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GEORGIA HS ASSN v. WADDELL 248 Ga. 542, 285 S.E.2d 7 (1981) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. POHLE v. CHEATHAM Court of Appeals of Indiana, 724 N.E.2d 655 (2000) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PEOPLE v. DLUGASH 41 N.Y.2d 725, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COHEN v. BAYSIDE S&L 62 Misc.2d 738, 309 N.Y.S.2d 980 (1970) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LUCY v. ZEHMER 196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PONDER v. GRAHAM 4 Fla. 23 (1851) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BLANTON v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 489 U.S. 538 (1989) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COLBY v. CARNEY HOSPITAL 356 Mass. 527, 254 N.E.2d 407 (1969) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GRIFFIN v. CALIFORNIA 380 U.S. 609 (1965) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BROWN v. SOUTHLAND 620 F.Supp (E.D.Mo. 1985) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MOSELEY v. ZIEG 180 Neb. 810; 146 N.W.2d 72 (1966) Case Brief.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
State Court System By: Ashanti, Glenn, Timmy, Julie.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PENNSYLVANIA v. BRUDER 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. Pamela L. PETERS Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 263 Wis.2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171 (2003)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COCKRELL v. HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. 611 S.E.2d 505 (S.C. 2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. CARRUTHERS v. STATE Supreme Court of Georgia, 528 S.E.2d 217 (2000) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE FARM v. CAMPBELL 538 U.S. 408 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LYNCH v. LYNCH 164 Ariz. 127 (1990) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LOWE v. QUINN 27 N.Y.2d 397, 267 N.E.2d (N.Y. 1971) Case Brief.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. STAFFORD 223 Kan. 62, 573 P.2d 970 (Kan. 1977) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. GUFFEY 262 S.W.2d 152 (Mo.Ct.App. 1953) Case Brief.
1 Working the IP Case Steve Baron Sept. 3, Today’s Agenda  Anatomy of an IP case  The Courts and the Law  Links to finding cases  Parts of.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. UNITED STATES v. JEWELL 532 F.2d 697 (2d Cir. 1976) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE 353 N.W.2d 213 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. NEWMAN v. SUMMY CO. 133 F.2d 465 (2d Cir. 1943) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BUSBY v. STATE 894 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2004) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. HANKS v. MCNEIL COAL CORP. 114 Colo. 578, 168 P.2d 256 (1946) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. WILLIAMS Supreme Court of Iowa 695 N.W.2d 23 (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STUMP v. SPARKMAN 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. OREGON STATE BAR v. SMITH 149 Or.App. 171, 942 P.2d 793 (1997) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. FINE v. DELALANDE, INC. 545 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. RIEMERS v. GRAND FORKS HERALD 688 N.W.2d 167 (N.D. 2004) Case Brief.
MORISSETTE v. UNITED STATES 342 U.S. 246 (1952)
Chapter 3 The U.S. Legal System Chapter 3: The U.S. Legal System
FLORIDA APPEALS (For the non-appellate lawyer)
Standard of Review & “Facts” on Appeal
SALTZMAN v. AHERN 306 So.2d 537 (Fla.App. 1975)
STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
MARTIN v. MARCIANO 871 A.2d 911 (R.I. 2005)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN REPRESENTATION
Appellate Courts: Let’s Take it Up
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. v. WENTZ 172 F.2d 80 (3d Cir. 1948)
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
BROWN v. BROWN 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. DCA 1974)
The difference between original and appellate jurisdiction.
NORRIS v. TOWN OF WHEATLAND 613 N.Y.S.2d 817 (S.Ct. Monroe Cty. 1994)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Courts and Court Systems
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER 53 Ill.App.2d 299, 202 N.E.2d 841 (1964)
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
Chapter 4 Case Law and Case Briefing
Presentation transcript:

STATE v. KINGMAN 463 P.2d 638 (Wash. 1970) Case Brief Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN PURPOSE: Kingman illustrates the problem of appellate review where the lower court record is insufficient to make appellate determinations. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN CAUSE OF ACTION: Eminent domain (petition by the State for an order of public use and necessity). Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN FACTS: State of Washington attempted to acquire the Kingmans’ property for a public use, namely, “to preserve a beautiful view of Lake Chelan and the foothills beyond.” The trial court denied the petition without making findings of fact or conclusions of law. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN ISSUE: Whether a judgment without findings of facts and conclusions of law should be vacated. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN HOLDING: Yes, order denying petition is set aside and case is remanded to lower court. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. STATE v. KINGMAN REASONING: A judgment entered in a case tried to the court where findings are required, without findings of fact having been made, is subject to a motion to vacate within the time for the taking of an appeal. There is nothing here which the appellate court can adequately review. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.