Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Mechanism of Amyloid Removal in Patients With Alzheimer.
Advertisements

Fig. 1 Anti-inflammatory drug treatment reduces the number of reactive microglia in the hippocampus of APPV717I mice. APPV717I transgenic mice (10 months.
Comment on “ApoE-Directed Therapeutics Rapidly Clear β-Amyloid and Reverse Deficits in AD Mouse Models” by Karthikeyan Veeraraghavalu, Can Zhang, Sean.
Biphasic Alteration of the Inhibitory Synapse Scaffold Protein Gephyrin in Early and Late Stages of an Alzheimer Disease Model  Eva Kiss, Karin Gorgas,
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
An Opiate Cocktail that Reduces Morphine Tolerance and Dependence
Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Alzheimer’s Disease
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Inhibition of UVB-Induced Skin Tumor Development by Drinking Green Tea Polyphenols Is Mediated Through DNA Repair and Subsequent Inhibition of Inflammation 
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Shilpak Chatterjee, Jonathan M. Eby, Amir A
Li He, Jamie Fong, Mark von Zastrow, Jennifer L Whistler  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
ApoE4 Accelerates Early Seeding of Amyloid Pathology
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Comment on “ApoE-Directed Therapeutics Rapidly Clear β-Amyloid and Reverse Deficits in AD Mouse Models” by Ashleigh R. Price, Guilian Xu, Zoe B. Siemienski,
Dominic M. Walsh, Dennis J. Selkoe  Neuron 
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
μ-Opioid Receptor and CREB Activation Are Required for Nicotine Reward
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Interleukin-18 and the Costimulatory Molecule B7-1 Have a Synergistic Anti-Tumor Effect on Murine Melanoma; Implication of Combined Immunotherapy for.
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
An Animal Model of a Behavioral Intervention for Depression
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Induction of Leptin Resistance by Activation of cAMP-Epac Signaling
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
ApoE and Clusterin Cooperatively Suppress Aβ Levels and Deposition
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Hapten-Specific Tolerance Promoted by Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 908-920 (December 2012) A Plaque-Specific Antibody Clears Existing β-amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer's Disease Mice  Ronald B. DeMattos, Jirong Lu, Ying Tang, Margaret M. Racke, Cindy A. DeLong, John A. Tzaferis, Justin T. Hole, Beth M. Forster, Peter C. McDonnell, Feng Liu, Robert D. Kinley, William H. Jordan, Michael L. Hutton  Neuron  Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 908-920 (December 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Age-Dependent Plaque Lowering with an N-terminal Aβ Antibody Chronic administration of the N-terminal antibody 3D6 significantly lowers plaque deposition in PDAPP mice when treatment is initiated at 9 months of age (prevention dosing) but fails to alter deposition when initiated at 18 months of age (therapeutic dosing). Nine-month-old PDAPP mice were treated for 3 months with weekly intraperitoneal injections of 12.5 mg/kg of 3D6 (n = 18) or vehicle control (n = 22). Time zero group (9 months old, n = 19) was sacrificed at the onset of the study. (A) In hippocampus, there was a 2.6-fold increase in deposited Aβ1-42 from 9 to 12 months and 3D6 treatment significantly lowered the deposited Aβ1-42 by 39% (p = 0.0161, t test). (B) In cortex, 3D6 significantly lowered Aβ1-42 by 69% (p = 0.0001, t test) but was not significantly different than the time zero (p = 0.3293, t test). Eighteen-month-old PDAPP mice were treated for 3 months with weekly intraperitoneal injections of 12.5 mg/kg of 3D6 (n = 22) or vehicle control (n = 21). Time zero group (18 months old, n = 23) was sacrificed at the onset of the study. (C) In hippocampus, very little further deposition occurred during the 3 months of treatment (9%) and 3D6 treatment had no significant effect on plaque lowering. (D) The Aβ1-42 in cortex did increase between 18 and 21 months (189%); however, 3D6 treatment had no significant effect at this age. The error bars represent SEM. Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Low Levels of Aβp3-42 Peptide in Plaque Can Facilitate Ex Vivo Antibody-Mediated Phagocytosis The Aβp3-42 peptide is present in both PDAPP and AD brains at low levels and opsonization with a monoclonal antibody in an ex vivo phagocytosis assay results in significant Aβ clearance. (A) Aβp3-42 concentration in brain lysates from AD (n = 10) and PDAPP mice (12 and 23 months old; n = 6) were determined by ELISA. (B) The prevalence of the Aβp3-42 peptide in AD and PDAPP brain was calculated relative to total Aβ42. (C and D) Histological analyses of deposited Aβ from a 24-month-old PDAPP mouse with either 3D6 (C) or mE8 (D). (E and F) Histological analysis of AD brain showed similar staining for 3D6 (E) and mE8 (F). (G) An ex vivo phagocytosis assay was conducted on AD brain sections. Prior to adding primary murine microglia, AD brain sections (20 μm) were preincubated with the following antibodies: 3D6 (Aβ1-x), 21F12 (Aβx-42), 2G3 (Aβx-40), mE8-IgG1 (Aβp3-42), mE8-IgG2a (Aβp3-42), or control IgG2b (same effector function as 3D6). After 24 hr incubation, the Aβ1-42 was determined by ELISA. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4 wells for each treatment except the no cells control (n = 35). Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Chronic Administration of an Anti-Aβp3-42 Antibody Significantly Reduces Pre-existing Deposited Aβ In Vivo A chronic study demonstrates that Aβp3-42 antibodies on either minimum or maximum effector function significantly lower existing plaque in aged PDAPP mice. PDAPP mice (23 to 24 months old) were treated for 3 months with weekly intraperitoneal injections of 12.5 mg/kg of the following antibodies: m3D6 (anti-Aβ1-x, IgG2b, n = 30), mE8-IgG1 (anti-Aβp3-x, n = 27), mE8-IgG2a (anti-Aβp3-x, n = 23), or control IgG2a (n = 27). A time zero group (∼24.5 months old, n = 15) was sacrificed at the onset of the study. (A) In hippocampus, PDAPP mice treated with mE8-IgG1 and mE8-IgG2a resulted in significantly decreased Aβ42 deposition (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively; Tukey's post hoc) as compared to the control IgG2a-injected animals. Mice treated with mE8-IgG2a had ∼30% lower Aβ42 in the hippocampus as compared to the time zero mice (t test; p < 0.0066). (B) Cortical extracts from PDAPP mice treated with mE8-IgG2a demonstrated a significant decrease for Aβ42 deposition (p < 0.05; Tukey's post hoc) as compared to the control IgG2a-injected animals. (C and D) Plasma ELISAs for Aβx-40 (C) or Aβx-42 (D) revealed a significant increase for both peptides in the 3D6-treated mice (p < 0.001, Tukey's post hoc) and no difference for the mE8 treatments. (E) An ELISA conducted on plasma from the conclusion of the study showed no difference in final IgG levels. The error bars represent SEM. Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Chronic Administration of an Anti-Aβp3-42 Antibody Alters Deposited Plaque without Exacerbating Microhemorrhage Histological analyses were performed to investigate whether chronic antibody treatment in aged PDAPP mice resulted in altered Aβ deposition or microhemorrhage. The study parameters are described in Figure 3. (A) Brain sections were immunostained with biotinylated anti-Aβ antibodies 3D6, 10D5, and mE8. Morphological differences in the deposited plaque were consistently observed in the animals treated with the Aβp3-x antibodies, wherein the plaque appears less defined in areas of the CA1 and CA3. High magnification from the boxed areas highlights the altered appearance of the deposited Aβ in the CA1 (3D6 and 10D5 stains). (B) The percent area of Aβ immunoreactivity in the hippocampus (3D6 immunostain) was measured (mean with the SEM). (C) Microhemorrhage was investigated by surveying ∼2 mm of brain tissue for hemosiderin-positive cells. No increase in hemosiderin-positive cells was observed in mice treated with mE8-IgG1 (10 ± 5) or mE8-IgG2a (97 ± 85), whereas a highly significant increase in 3D6 (2939 ± 617)-treated mice was observed relative to control (19 ± 9). The inset is a representative picture of a menigeal vessel surrounded by several hemosiderin-positive cells (Perls stain). Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Dose Response and Prevention Studies with an Anti-Aβp3-42 Antibody Aged PDAPP mice treated with the anti-Aβp3-42 antibody demonstrate a dose-dependent reduction of plaque, whereas the same antibody failed to significantly prevent deposition in young PDAPP mice. PDAPP mice (16 months old) were treated for 6 months with weekly subcutaneous injections of mE8-IgG2a at the following doses: 12.5 mg/kg (n = 23), 4 mg/kg (n = 23), or 1.5 mg/kg (n = 21). A time zero group (16 months old, n = 30) was sacrificed at the onset of the study. (A) In hippocampus, PDAPP mice treated with the varying doses of mE8-IgG2a showed a significant dose-dependent decrease in deposited Aβ1-42 (p < 0.0001, ANOVA). Animals dosed with 4 and 12.5 mg/kg of mE8c had significantly lower deposited Aβ1-42 as compared to the control IgG2a-injected animals (p < 0.001, Tukey's post hoc). (B) In cortex, a less significant dose-dependent decrease in deposited Aβ1-42 (p < 0.0073, ANOVA) was observed. Animals dosed with 12.5 mg/kg of mE8-IgG2a had significantly lower deposited Aβ1-42 as compared to the control IgG2a-injected animals (p < 0.05, Tukey's post hoc). A plaque prevention study was conducted wherein PDAPP mice (∼5.5 months old) were treated for 7 months with weekly subcutaneous injections of 12.5 mg/kg of the following antibodies: m3D6 (anti-Aβ1-x, IgG2b, n = 29), mE8-IgG2a (anti-Aβp3-x, n = 29), and control IgG2a (n = 29). A time zero group (5.5 months old, n = 30) and an untreated group of PDAPP mice (10.5 months of age, n = 27) were sacrificed to follow the deposition of Aβ1-42 during the course of the study. (C) In hippocampus, PDAPP mice treated with 3D6 had a significant decrease in deposited Aβ1-42 at the conclusion of the study (68%; p < 0.001, Tukey's post hoc). Preventative treatment with mE8-IgG2a had a nonsignificant ∼30% lowering of deposited Aβ1-42. (D) In cortex, similar plaque prevention was observed for mice treated with 3D6 (52%; p < 0.001, Tukey's post hoc), whereas mE8-IgG2a failed to significantly prevent deposition (21%). The error bars represent SEM. Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Aβ Antibody In Vivo Target Engagement Studies in Aged PDAPP Mice (A) Aged PDAPP mice (n = 4 to 5 per group) received a single 40 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection of the following biotinylated Aβ antibodies: 3D6 (anti-Aβ1-x), mE8 (anti-Aβp3-x), and control IgG. The antibody in vivo target engagement (plaque binding) was assessed histologically (strepavidin-HRP followed by DAB) 72 hr after injection (acute treatment, top). A subchronic 3 week study was conducted with the same antibodies (40 mg/kg weekly, 4 total doses, n = 7 to 9 per group) and the target engagement and CSF:plasma ratio was evaluated as above (subchronic treatment, bottom). A subgroup from the acute and subchronic studies (n = 3 to 4 per group) were evaluated within the same histological run in order to determine the relative target engagement in hippocampus (shown in the figure insets). (B) To quantify the target engagement, six aged PDAPP mice received a single 40 mg/kg injection of biotinylated 3D6 or mE8 and the total area of plaque labeling in hippocampus and cortex was measured histologically (strepavidin-HRP followed by DAB). When normalized for each respective target, the anti-Aβp3-x mE8 antibody showed significantly more target engagement in hippocampus (p = 0.0005) and cortex (p = 0.0408). The error bars represent SEM. (C) A nontransgenic rat 24 hr PK study performed with biotinylated Aβ antibodies 3D6 (anti-Aβ1-x) and mE8 (anti-Aβp3-x) showed a slight but significant difference in plasma (p = 0.0012) and CSF antibody levels (p = 0.034). No significant difference was observed in the CSF:plasma ratio. (D) Antibody binding specificity in the presence of increasing concentrations of soluble Aβ1-40 was determined histologically for 3D6 and mE8. Biotinylated antibodies (3 μg/ml) were preincubated with soluble Aβ1-40 (0, 0.5, 5.0, and 10 μg/ml) prior to performing immunohistochemistry on brain sections from aged PDAPP mice. Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Summary of Mechanism of Action Insights for Plaque Binding Anti-Aβ Antibodies Cartoon model that summarizes the important mechanistic insights for plaque-derived soluble equilibriums' effect on Aβ immunotherapy. The cartoon depicts two different physiological situations in brain, the presence of low (A) or high (B–D) plaque loads, which are thought to represent the very earliest phase of AD (10 years prior to diagnosis) and AD at first diagnosis, respectively. (A) In the earliest phase of disease, an antibody that binds both soluble and insoluble Aβ will probably be efficacious as it may engage the sparsely deposited plaque and lead to its removal (prevention). Conversely, these antibodies may also act through the direct binding to soluble Aβ, either monomer or oligomeric complexes within the CNS, to facilitate the prevention or elimination of amyloid-promoting Aβ seeds. During this early phase, an antibody that specifically targets plaque will only be effective at preventing and removing deposited Aβ if its epitope is present at a sufficient level. (B) During stages of the disease in which extensive plaque deposition has already occurred, an antibody that binds both soluble and insoluble Aβ will probably be ineffective at lowering pre-existing plaque due to limited target binding (i.e., becomes saturated with soluble Aβ). (C) Additionally, if the soluble binding antibody is of weak affinity, it may result in redistribution of soluble Aβ into the vasculature as CAA. (D) Lastly, an antibody that is plaque specific will probably be highly efficacious at removing existing plaque due to the high levels of target engagement. Neuron 2012 76, 908-920DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions