Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Mechanism of Ska Recruitment by Ndc80 Complexes to Kinetochores
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Spindle Position Is Coordinated with Cell-Cycle Progression through Establishment of Mitotic Exit-Activating and -Inhibitory Zones  Leon Y. Chan, Angelika.
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Jakub K. Famulski, Gordon K. Chan  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
Toward a Molecular Structure of the Eukaryotic Kinetochore
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Annika Guse, Masanori Mishima, Michael Glotzer  Current Biology 
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol  Shubha Anand, Sue Penrhyn-Lowe, Ashok R Venkitaraman 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Michael D. Blower, Maxence Nachury, Rebecca Heald, Karsten Weis  Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment  Julian Haase, Mary.
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
RECQL4 is a MAP with a spindle function.
Dual Detection of Chromosomes and Microtubules by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Drives Spindle Assembly  Boo Shan Tseng, Lei Tan, Tarun M. Kapoor,
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 383-392 (May 2010) Aurora B Phosphorylates Spatially Distinct Targets to Differentially Regulate the Kinetochore-Microtubule Interface  Julie P.I. Welburn, Mathijs Vleugel, Dan Liu, John R. Yates, Michael A. Lampson, Tatsuo Fukagawa, Iain M. Cheeseman  Molecular Cell  Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 383-392 (May 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Phosphorylation of the KMN Network by Aurora B Does Not Affect Kinetochore Assembly (A) In vitro assembly properties of the C. elegans KMN and KSDMSDNSD network. The KNL-1 and MIS-12 complex were copurified and incubated with the NDC80 complex, followed by gel filtration chromatography of the sample. Elution profiles of the KMN network (top), the KSDMSDNSD network (middle), and the NDC-80 complex alone (bottom) are shown. The KNL-3, KNL-1, and NDC-80 components were detected by western blotting. Also see Figures S1 and S2. (B) Images of live mitotic cells from clonal human cell lines stably expressing moderate amounts of GFP-hDsn1, GFP-hDsn1SA, and GFP-hDsn1SD. Each fusion protein localizes to kinetochores throughout mitosis. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Purification of GFP-hDsn1, GFP-hDsn1SA, and GFP-hDsn1SD and their associated proteins using a one-step immunoprecipitation to directly isolate the tagged hDsn1 from stable clonal cell lines. Percent sequence coverage from the mass spectrometric analysis of these samples for each KMN network component and associated spindle checkpoint components is indicated. (D) Immunofluorescence images acquired using antibodies against Hec1 (hNdc80), hKNL1, and hDsn1 in HeLa cells under control conditions or after 3 hr treatment with nocodazole, taxol, monastrol, or ZM447439. Scale bar, 10 μm. Also see Figure S2. (E) Bar graph showing the average ratio of kinetochore fluorescence intensities (percent relative to control) for the indicated antibodies/conditions. Error bars represent standard error. The fluorescence intensity of 30–80 kinetochores per cell was measured for five to ten cells per condition. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Combinatorial Phosphorylation of the KMN Network Generates Multiple Levels of Microtubule-Binding Activity (A) Left, diagrams and cartoon model showing the components and organization of the human and C. elegans KMN networks. (B) Top, gel showing microtubule cosedimentation of 50 nM NDC-80 complex and NDC-80SD complex. Bottom, graph showing the average percent protein bound relative to microtubule concentration for the wild-type NDC-80 complex, NDC-80 complex phosphorylated by Ipl1 (data from Cheeseman et al., 2006), and the NDC-80SD complex. (C) Cosedimentation assays with the N terminus of C. elegans KNL-1 and a KNL-1SD and the full-length KNL-1/MIS-12 complex and KNL-1SD/MIS-12SD complex. (D–F) Graphs showing the microtubule-binding activity for 50 nM input protein of the indicated KMN network mutants. Each microtubule-binding experiment shown in this figure was repeated at least three times with the graphs representing an average of this data. The points were fitted with MATLAB using a modified Hill equation. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Representative gels for the data shown in these graphs and microtubule-binding data for a KSAMSANSA mutant are included in Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Phosphorylation of the KMN Network Has Synergistic Effects In Vivo (A and B) Growth curve analysis of cellular viability for the nonphosphorylatable (A) or phosphomimetic (B) KMN mutants in chicken DT40 cells. Tetracycline was added at time 0 to the culture to eliminate expression of the wild-type protein. The number of cells not stained with trypan blue was counted. (C and D) Summary of phenotypes for complementation experiments in Ndc80-, KNL1-, or Dsn1-deficient DT40 cells expressing the nonphosphorylatable (C) or phosphomimetic (D) mutants. In cell lines that express Dsn1 in combination with KNL1 or Ndc80 phosphomutants, the endogenous Dsn1 is also present. Five hundred to one thousand cells were counted for each cell line. (E) Chromosome morphology and mitotic spindle shown by DNA staining using DAPI (blue) and α-tubulin staining (green) in the Ndc80-, KNL1-, or Dsn1-deficient DT40 cells expressing the nonphosphorylatable or phosphomimetic mutants. White arrowheads show kinetochore attachment defects. (F) Outer kinetochore assembly state in the phosphomutants shown by DNA staining using DAPI (blue) and Ndc80 staining (green). Scale bars, 10 μm. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Aurora B Phosphorylation of the KMN Network Occurs under Conditions where Attachments Must Be Corrected (A) Western blots validating the phosphospecific hDsn1 and hKNL1 antibodies with recombinant protein using the indicated conditions. (B) Immunofluorescence images acquired using the indicated antibodies in untreated HeLa cells or in cells treated with nocodazole, taxol, monastrol, or ZM447439 for 3 hr. Numbers indicate the average percent quantitated fluorescence (±SEM) relative to control-treated metaphase cells. Images are scaled equivalently except for the nocodazole-treated samples. Phospho antibodies show spindle pole background staining that is not eliminated by ZM447439 treatment. (C) Ratio of fluorescence intensities for the images in (B) expressed as a percentage relative to controls (±SEM). Asterisk indicates that intensity in taxol-treated cells for S60p hKNL1 was not determined due to extensive spindle background in this condition. (D) Immunofluorescence images acquired using the indicated antibodies in HeLa cells treated with 6 ng/ml nocodazole to generate cells with both aligned (green boxes) and misaligned (red boxes) chromosomes. The checkpoint protein Bub1 localizes preferentially to unattached kinetochores or to those that are not under tension. Phospho-Dsn1 shows a statistically significant increase (95% confidence interval in a t test) on misaligned chromosomes (125 kinetochores analyzed) relative to aligned chromosomes (240 kinetochores analyzed). Scale bars, 10 μm. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Differential Phosphorylation of the KMN Network under Distinct Kinetochore Attachment States Modulates Outer Kinetochore Microtubule-Binding Activity (A) Image and linescan showing position of mCherry-Hec1 relative to a Mis12-targeted FRET sensor. (B) Table showing the average relative position of an N-terminally tagged mCherry-Hec1 (±SEM) to the indicated FRET probe tested as illustrated in (A). At least five different cells were imaged for each probe with at least ten kinetochore pairs per cell. These positions agree closely with those determined by Wan et al. (2009). (C) Average FRET emission ratio (±SEM) for an artificial Aurora B substrate FRET probe (Liu et al., 2009) targeted to kinetochores using either the Ndc80/Hec1 N or C terminus in the indicated conditions (n > 20 cells per condition). (D) Graph as in (C) for FRET probe targeted with hMis12 or the Ndc80/HEC1 N or C terminus for time points following the washout of 30 ng/ml nocodazole. For each time point, >20 kinetochores were measured in >20 cells. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Differential Phosphorylation of the KMN Network under Distinct Kinetochore Attachment States Modulates Outer Kinetochore Microtubule-Binding Activity Cartoon depiction of the KMN network at kinetochores under attached (with tension between sister chromatids), intermediate (with partial tension), and unattached (with no tension) states. A gradient of Aurora B phosphorylation emanates from the inner centromere. When tension is present, the kinetochore is stretched relative to its resting state such that the Ndc80 complex is positioned distally to the inner centromere. When no tension is present, the Ndc80 complex is more proximal to the inner centromere, resulting in higher levels of phosphorylation. Values for the position of the indicated subunits within the kinetochore are from Wan et al. (2009). Molecular Cell 2010 38, 383-392DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions