Anti-Inducible Costimulator Monoclonal Antibody Treatment of Canine Chronic Graft- versus-Host Disease  Scott S. Graves, Maura H. Parker, Diane Stone,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kazunori Kanehira, Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson, Dong Chen, Lawrence E
Advertisements

Induction of Graft-versus-Leukemia (GVL) Effect without Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) by Pretransplant Donor Treatment with Immunomodulators  Shoshana.
Skin Explant Model of Human Graft-versus-Host Disease: Prediction of Clinical Outcome and Correlation with Biological Risk Factors  Xiao-nong Wang, Matthew.
Sirolimus in Combination with Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus Plus Methotrexate for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Influence of Donor Microbiota on the Severity of Experimental Graft-versus-Host- Disease  Isao Tawara, Chen Liu, Hiroya Tamaki, Tomomi Toubai, Yaping Sun,
A CD8 DE loop peptide analog prevents graft-versus-host disease in a multiple minor histocompatibility antigen-mismatched bone marrow transplantation.
How to Treat MDS without Stem Cell Transplantation
Pegylated TNF-α Receptor Does Not Prevent Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in the Dog Leukocyte Antigen-Nonidentical Unrelated Canine Model  Scott S. Graves,
George E. Georges, Vladimir Lesnikov, Szczepan W
Adoptive Immunotherapy Against Allogeneic Kidney Grafts in Dogs with Stable Hematopoietic Trichimerism  Scott S. Graves, William J. Hogan, Christian Kuhr,
Vaccination of Children following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
LBH589 Enhances T Cell Activation In Vivo and Accelerates Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mice  Dapeng Wang, Cristina Iclozan, Chen Liu, Changqing Xia, Claudio.
A Canine Model of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
Kazunori Kanehira, Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson, Dong Chen, Lawrence E
Blocking LFA-1 Activation with Lovastatin Prevents Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mouse Bone Marrow Transplantation  Yang Wang, Dan Li, Dan Jones, Roland.
Sympathectomy Protects Denervated Skin from Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Induction of Graft-versus-Leukemia (GVL) Effect without Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) by Pretransplant Donor Treatment with Immunomodulators  Shoshana.
Therapeutic Effects of a NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, Pevonedistat, on Sclerodermatous Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mice  Chien-Chun Steven Pai,
Pharmacologic Expansion of Donor-Derived, Naturally Occurring CD4+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Reduces Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Lethality Without.
Increase of Intermediate Monocytes in Graft-versus-Host Disease: Correlation with MDR1+Th17.1 Levels and the Effect of Prednisolone and 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin.
Sabina Kersting, Leo F. Verdonck 
Genital Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Females: A Cross-Sectional Study  Eva Smith Knutsson, Yvonne Björk, Anna-Karin Broman, Lotti Helström, Anne-Marie.
Therapeutic Benefit of Bortezomib on Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Is Tissue Specific and Is Associated with Interleukin-6 Levels  Chien-Chun Steven.
Peripheral Blood Grafts from Unrelated Donors Are Associated with Increased Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease without Improved Survival  Mary.
TIM-1 Blockade of the Donor Graft Provides Protection Against Lethal Gvhd  Bettina P. Iliopoulou, PhD, Katie Hsu, MS, Antonio Pierini, MD, Gordon J. Freeman,
Evidence of a Graft-versus-Hodgkin Lymphoma Effect in the Setting of Extensive Bone Marrow Involvement  Paolo Anderlini, MD  Biology of Blood and Marrow.
Re: Twenty-Year Follow-Up in Patients with Aplastic Anemia Given Marrow Grafts from HLA-Identical Siblings and Randomized to Receive Methotrexate/Cyclosporine.
Donor-to-Recipient ABO Mismatch Does Not Impact Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Regardless of Graft Source  Sharat Damodar,
Lisa A. Palmer, George E. Sale, John I
Haploidentical Transplantation Using T Cell Replete Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and Myeloablative Conditioning in Patients with High-Risk Hematologic.
Should Methotrexate plus Calcineurin Inhibitors Be Considered Standard of Care for Prophylaxis of acute Graft-versus-Host Disease?  Rainer Storb, Joseph.
PRO 140 Monoclonal Antibody to CCR5 Prevents Acute Xenogeneic Graft-versus-Host Disease in NOD-scid IL-2Rynull Mice  Denis R. Burger, Yvonne Parker, Kathryn.
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Fail to Prevent Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease and Graft Rejection after Dog Leukocyte Antigen-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation 
Host Basophils Are Dispensable for Induction of Donor T Helper 2 Cell Differentiation and Severity of Experimental Graft-versus-Host Disease  Isao Tawara,
Late-Onset Colitis after Cord Blood Transplantation Is Consistent with Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Results of a Blinded Histopathological Review  Filippo.
A Radio-Resistant Perforin-Expressing Lymphoid Population Controls Allogeneic T Cell Engraftment, Activation, and Onset of Graft-versus-Host Disease in.
Tracking ex vivo-expanded CD4+CD25+ and CD8+CD25+ regulatory T cells after infusion to prevent donor lymphocyte infusion-induced lethal acute graft-versus-host.
Paul A. Hoffmeister, Sangeeta R. Hingorani, Barry E. Storer, K
Paul J. Martin, Terry Furlong, Scott D. Rowley, Steven A
Recipient B Cells Are Not Required for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Induction  Catherine Matte-Martone, Xiajian Wang, Britt Anderson, Dhanpat Jain, Anthony.
A Phase I/II Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination with Cyclosporine for Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Myeloablative Conditioning.
Graft-versus-Host Disease Induced Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect: Greater Impact on Relapse and Disease-Free Survival after Reduced Intensity Conditioning 
Total Body Irradiation–Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Unrelated Donor Transplantation.
An Open-Label Phase II Randomized Trial of Topical Dexamethasone and Tacrolimus Solutions for the Treatment of Oral Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease 
The Innate Immune Sensor Sting Can Augment or Ameliorate Graft-Versus-Host Disease Dependent on the Genetic Disparity between Donors and Recipients  Cameron.
Clinical Endpoints in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Studies: The Cost of Freedom  Haesook T. Kim, Philippe Armand  Biology of Blood.
Post-hematopoietic cell transplantation control of graft-versus-host disease by donor CD4+25+ T cells to allow an effective graft-versus-leukemia response 
Brile Chung, Eric Dudl, Akira Toyama, Lora Barsky, Kenneth I. Weinberg 
Regression Models for Hazard Rates Versus Cumulative Incidence Probabilities in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Data  Brent R. Logan, Mei-Jie Zhang,
What is quality in a transplant program?
Salvage Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Fludarabine and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation after Rejection of First Allografts  Boglarka.
T-Cell Receptor Vα Spectratype Analysis of a CD4-Mediated T-Cell Response against Minor Histocompatibility Antigens Involved in Severe Graft-versus-Host.
Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) following Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): Higher Response Rate In Recipients.
Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation after a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Containing High-Dose Thymoglobulin Leads to Controllable Graft-versus-Host.
Specific donor Vβ-associated CD4+ T-cell responses correlate with severe acute graft- versus-host disease directed to multiple minor histocompatibility.
Blood and Marrow Transplant Handbook
Therapeutic Immunosuppression Concentrations on Day 0 and the Development of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Current Graft-versus-Host Disease–Free, Relapse-Free Survival: A Dynamic Endpoint to Better Define Efficacy after Allogenic Transplant  Scott R. Solomon,
Preengraftment Syndrome after Unrelated Cord Blood Transplant Is a Strong Predictor of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease  Haydar Frangoul, Li.
Low Serum Levels of Total Rabbit-IgG Is Associated with Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation:
Pharmacological Immunosuppression Reduces But Does Not Eliminate the Need for Total-Body Irradiation in Nonmyeloablative Conditioning Regimens for Hematopoietic.
Mammen Chandy  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 
Twenty-Year Follow-Up of a Controlled Trial Comparing a Combination of Methotrexate Plus Cyclosporine with Cyclosporine Alone for Prophylaxis of Graft-versus-Host.
Yuri Fedoriw, T. Danielle Samulski, Allison M. Deal, Cherie H
Frédéric Baron, Rainer Storb 
Induction of Lethal Graft-versus-Host Disease by Anti-CD137 Monoclonal Antibody in Mice Prone to Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease  Wonyoung Kim, Juyang.
Treatment versus Transplant for Challenging Hematologic Disorders
What Role Is There for Antithymocyte Globulin in Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative Canine Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation?  Razvan Diaconescu, Marie-Térèse.
Roles of CD28, CTLA4, and Inducible Costimulator in Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mice  Jun Li, Kenrick Semple, Woong-Kyung Suh, Chen Liu, Fangping.
Mary Eapen  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 
Presentation transcript:

Anti-Inducible Costimulator Monoclonal Antibody Treatment of Canine Chronic Graft- versus-Host Disease  Scott S. Graves, Maura H. Parker, Diane Stone, George E. Sale, Smitha P.S. Pillai, Melissa M. Johnson, Rainer Storb  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation  Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 50-54 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.010 Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schema for induction and treatment of chronic GVHD in DLA-mismatched unrelated HCT dogs. On day 0 recipients received 9.2 Gy total body irradiation and donor marrow. On day 1 recipient dogs were given apheresed donor buffy coat cells obtained from their respective donors. Immunosuppression (arrows) consisted of .4 mg/kg methotrexate injected i.v. on days 1, 3, 6, and 11 and oral CSP given on days –1 to 78 at dosing designed to maintain serum levels at 100 to 300 ng/mL. Oral ursodiol was given on days –1 to 80 to reduce the incidence of liver GVHD. Clinical signs of GVHD occurred from days 47 to 112 (tick marks). Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 50-54DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Histopathology of abdominal skin biopsies demonstrating the effect of anti-ICOS on chronic GVHD of the skin. (A) Skin biopsies from dog H799 collected 4 days after the third injection of anti-ICOS injection show dense lymphocytic infiltration surrounding the pilo-sebaceous structure and follicular epithelium (arrows). Lymphocytes are present in the superficial and deep dermis and exocytosis of the epidermis is multifocal. (B) The biopsy collected 7 days after the third injection of anti-ICOS reveals minimal numbers of lymphocytes surrounding the pilo-sebaceous structures, few lymphocytes in the superficial dermis, and no epidermal exocytosis is present. Magnification is 100×. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 50-54DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Serum levels of α-ICOS. Blood was collected from dogs within 2 minutes and at .5, 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection of anti-ICOS mAb (4 mg/kg, i.v.) for the first 2 doses. For the third dose the 72-hour time point was replaced by a day 9 draw. One dog provided blood at days 10 through 17 after the third injection of anti-ICOS. Serum from the blood samples was tested for levels of anti-ICOS by ELISA. Anti-ICOS levels were zero for blood samples from all 5 dogs collected before injection of ICOS. Data are presented as mean levels of antibody ± standard deviation for 5 dogs. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 50-54DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Anti-ICOS extends survival of dogs with GVHD. Two groups of dogs were studied from the initial diagnosis of chronic GVHD to euthanasia. In the control group, dogs H642, H634, H678, H694, H708, H720, H709, and H698 were untreated during this period aside from antibiotic and fluid support. The anti-ICOS mAb-treated group, dogs H789, H799, H800, H803, and H805, received either 1 or 2 courses of anti-ICOS mAb. The difference in the survival periods of the 2 groups was significant (log-rank test). Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 50-54DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions