Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene fromNicotiana alata  Martin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Engineering a Protein Scaffold from a PHD Finger
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
The Solution Structure of an AlcR-DNA Complex Sheds Light onto the Unique Tight and Monomeric DNA Binding of a Zn2Cys6 Protein  Bertrand Cahuzac, Rachel.
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Structure of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase elucidates the structure and function of a new family of hydrolases  Anne Mølgaard, Sakari Kauppinen, Sine Larsen  Structure 
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Crystal structure of the apoptotic suppressor CrmA in its cleaved form
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene fromNicotiana alata  Martin J Scanlon, Marcus CS Lee, Marilyn A Anderson, David J Craik  Structure  Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 793-802 (July 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8

Figure 1 Diagrammatic representation of the domain organisation of NaProPI (the N-terminal signal sequence and the putative C-terminal vacuolar targeting signal have been omitted for clarity). The precursor protein, shown as a linear gene product in the upper part of the diagram, forms a circular ‘bracelet’ structure that is ‘clasped’ by three disulphide bonds (yellow) between the N- and C-terminal repeats. Each repeat (labelled A–F) contains a protease-reactive site (red), which is specific for either chymotrypsin (C1 and C2) or trypsin (T1–4). Cleavage in each of the six linker regions (green) releases six active domains which are the native inhibitors shown on the right of the diagram. aPI1 is the gene product of a single repeat from NaProPI; aPI1 contains portions of the sequence from C1 and C2 which are joined by the five-residue linker sequence EEKKN. Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 2 NMR data used in structure determination.(a) Summary of the NMR data used for sequence-specific assignment and identification of secondary structure in aPI1. Shaded bars indicate sequential connectivities observed in a 200 ms mixing time NOESY spectrum at 313K and pH 5.8; the height of the bars indicates their strength. Slowly exchanging amide protons are indicated: open circles, amide protons still present 2 h after dissolution in2H2O; half-filled circles, amide protons still present 4 h after dissolution in2H2O; filled circles, amide protons still present 8 h after dissolution in2H2O.3JHNHα coupling constants are indicated: filled squares,3JHNHα > 8; open squares,3JHNHα < 5; half-filled squares, 8 Hz >3JHNHα > 6 Hz. (The figure was produced using the program Vince.)(b) Distribution of intraresidue (white), sequential (light grey), medium (dark grey) and long-range (black) distance constraints as a function of residue number. Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 3 The solution structure of aPI1.(a) Stereoview of the backbone heavy atoms (N, C, Cα) of the final 20 structures of aPI1 superimposed over theβ-sheet residues. Residues Met1–Ser20 are shown in red, the ‘linker’ residues Glu21–Asn25 are in green and Asp25–Ser54 are in blue. The four disulphide bonds are shown in yellow.(b) Stereoview of the final structures in the same orientation as (a) showing all heavy atoms (coloured magenta) of the well-defined sidechains (Sχ1 > 0.8) in the well-defined (Sφ,ϕ > 0.9) regions of aPI1. The colour scheme is the same as in (a) and for reasons of clarity, residues 1–7 and 19–27 have been omitted from the figure. Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 4 Schematic diagram of the secondary structural elements of aPI1 showing the NOEs betweenβ strands (double-headed arrows) and the position of proposed hydrogen bonds (broken lines). Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 5 Secondary shifts for the Hα protons of aPI1 (white bars) and the contiguous native inhibitor C1 (black bars). The positions of the cysteine residues and the disulfide connectivity are illustrated above. Numbers in italics indicate the residue numbering in C1. Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 6 A comparison of the structures of the contiguous native inhibitor T1, the two-chain inhibitor C2 and aPI1.(a) The molecules are shown as Cα ribbons of the mean structure from each NMR ensemble superimposed over the backbone heavy atoms (N, C, Cα) of theirβ-hairpin regions. The residues are colour-coded: residues Lys35–Ser53 of T1, Lys1A–Ser19A of C2 and Met1–Ser20 of aPI1 are coloured red; Asp1–Ser29 of T1, Arg1B–Ser28B of C2 and Asp26–Ser54 of aPI1 are coloured blue; residues Asp30–Pro34 of T1 and the linker region Glu21–Asn25 of aPI1 are coloured green; and the protease-reactive sites of the inhibitors are shown in purple.(b) A rotation by 90° of the ribbons shown in (a). Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)

Figure 7 Cα ribbon diagrams of(a) aPI1 and(b) T1. The ribbons were generated in InsightII using the mean coordinates for the NMR-derived family of structures of aPI1 and T1 (PDB code 1tih). The width of the ribbon is determined by the atomic root mean square (rms) deviation from the mean of the Cα atom position across the family of structures. Residues where the Cα rms < 1 are coloured blue and those where the rms > 1 are coloured green. The termini of both molecules are labelled. Structure 1999 7, 793-802DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80103-8)