Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Assoc. Superintendent Kurt Farnsworth, Assessment Coordinator Julie Quinn, Assessment Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services July 24, Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section September, Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability.
Detailed Slideshow. Why is North Carolina developing Home Base? The central focus of READY is improving every students learning... …and enabling and ensuring.
21 st Century Balanced Assessment: What Does It Mean to My School? WVDE 2008 Fall Regional School Counselors Workshop West Virginia Department of Education.
DELAWARE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Presented to District Test Coordinators February 17, 2010.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
1 Test Coordinator Training Spring 2014 Test Security.
Field Testing Testing the Test March PARCC Consortium 2 Governed by the education chiefs in the states.
Selecting and Assigning Accessibility Features and Accommodated Test Forms in PearsonAccess 1 Accessibility Features and Accommodations.
Beginning in DTC Spring Workshop January 22, 2013.
Smarter Balanced Field Test MARCH 2014 WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Department of Research, Evaluation & Assessment A Tour of Assessment Information and Data on the MDE Website Katherine Drake Rennie.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers September 2013.
1. SAGE Portal – Technology Specifications released – Windows and Mac Secure Browsers released SAGE Formative Upcoming Key Dates 2.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
1 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services March 21, 2014.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Minnesota Assessment Conference Mathematics MCA-III Online Testing Jennifer Dugan, Sandy Gimpl, and Rosemary Heinitz.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 22, 2012 Jose Ortega Rodney Okamoto SMARTER Balanced.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) PARENT WORKSHOP.
Products being integrated to create Home Base OpenClass Collaboration Schoolnet Instructional Tools and Assessment PowerSchool Student Information Core.
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting #4 The Journey Continues! April/May, 2013.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Holistic Rating Training Requirements Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent Sabra Gage, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information Review of Updates
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
The Common Core State Standards in TennesseeThe Common Core State Standards in Tennessee An OverviewAn Overview.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
1 Judy W. Park, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, Utah State Office of Education.
Data Cleanup Tools 1. Close Out 2015 SAGE Testing Overview of Special Codes Management of Special Codes Working with Special Codes – TIDE – ORS Use Cases.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Utah State Office of Education.
Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Director, Research & Assessment A DISCUSSION ABOUT STUDENT ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH AND EXCELLENCE Canyons Board of Education February.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Assessment Update California Mathematics Council.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Testing Information Session SAGE Testing Information 1 Information for Parents and Schools.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 2015 Missouri Assessment Program Assessment Updates Shaun Bates Director.
KAREN TOHINAKA SAGE Overview. What is SAGE? SAGE (Student Assessment of Growth and Excellence)  is Utah’s computer adaptive assessment system aligned.
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
North Carolina’s READY Initiative to Prepare Students for College and Career.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 2015 Keric Ashley, Interim Deputy Superintendent District,
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
SAGE Spring Summative Training Assessment and Accountability Utah State Office of Education.
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Smarter Balanced Assessments: What do families need to know?
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Presentation transcript:

Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Assoc. Superintendent Kurt Farnsworth, Assessment Coordinator Julie Quinn, Assessment Coordinator Utah State Office of Education

Computer Adaptive Test Adaptive 1 st year – 2014 Not fully adaptive due to operational field test Will need item stats and student scores to be fully adaptive – 2015 Message to the field: SAGE is an adaptive Test Students will receive their results (fall) SAGE results will be used for reporting and accountability 2

Computer Adaptive Test Adaptive Engine – Every student similar experience Adaptive algorithm used 2014 All assessable standards assessed Individualized – each student has easy – difficult questions The first year will provide the data needed to fully adapt to student performance starting with the fall interim in 2014 The same number of questions All levels of critical thinking Grade/course level content Message to the field: SAGE is an adaptive test The test will be even more precise after the first year when we have statistics on the questions and baseline data on each student Every student will be assessed: on all standards in their grade/course, all levels of critical thinking The same number of questions 3

Computer Adaptive Test Adaptive tests measure grade/course content Scores are not comparable if the content measured is not the same. If you measure different content for struggling students, teachers will teach different content to those students. If you measure different content for struggling students, accountability incentives could lock lower performing students into curricula that will not prepare them for college or careers. Message to the Field SAGE will assess the abilities of the lowest performing to the highest performing student by providing less difficult to very difficult questions within the grade/course standards in which the student is enrolled.

Participation Policy Parent Rights Parents may choose to Opt out of testing but send their student to school Parents may choose to not have their student attend school on testing day USOE Participation Policy Policy on Web content/uploads/2014/02/Portal_CMS_Tutorial_Resource.pdf content/uploads/2014/02/Portal_CMS_Tutorial_Resource.pdf USOE has not created, nor endorsed, nor required a form All students enrolled in a public school are included in the aggregate data submitted to the federal government, whether they test or not Absent student = Absent code; no participation, not included in proficiency calculation Opt out/Refuse to Test = RT code; yes participation, proficiency of 1 (not proficient) 5

Participation Policy Message to the field: Parents may choose to not have their students participate in testing All students enrolled in a public school are included in the aggregate data submitted to the federal government Students not participating in SAGE, will not receive test results in the fall Teachers will not receive SAGE results for students not participating in the tests SAGE results will be used for reporting and accountability Parents concerned with test questions may: see the training tests on the public website Review the comments of the 15 member parent review committee 6

SAGE Results Reality Simple Equation New, more rigorous standards + New, more rigorous assessments = Reduced % of students proficient 7

SAGE Results Reality Message to the Field Reduced proficiency is A result of more rigorous standards A result of more rigorous assessments A result of raising the bar/expectations for all students Reduced proficiency is not Decreased student performance Decreased instructional excellence Decreased school achievement Student proficiency will increase as students, parents and teachers work together implementing the standards and assessments 8

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Formative Teacher resource Formative tests & test questions Instructional resources Interim Fall and Midyear adaptive assessments Similar to summative Summative Spring adaptive assessments Used for state reporting and accountability reports 9

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Formative Available November 2013 Version 2 – March 2014 New Features include: Teacher created items Enhanced resource bank Version 3 – May 2014 Status of UTIPS Old UTIPS ends June 30, 2014 UTIPS Core ends June 30,

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Interim Available Fall 2014 Fall to Spring growth Administer only fall or fall and midwinter Adaptive Similar to summative test In the future, may also include smaller test options for specific standards 11

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Summative Computer adaptive test Trimester window begins February 11 Each LEA may only test within a 6 week window Three week window for early writing only – optional Results in the fall of 2014 Immediate results beginning in

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Writing Two prompts 1 st prompt is Opinion/argumentative (longer response) Students must complete 1 st prompt before they can access the 2 nd prompt 2 nd prompt is informative/explanatory prompt. (shorter response) Rubrics can be accessed on the SAGE Portal. FAQs Students can have a blank scratch paper, but needs to be treated as secure material. Highlighting and an online notepad is also available – SAGE writing and DWA 2015 – SAGE writing is the DWA 13

SAGE is an assessment SYSTEM Message to the Field The SAGE assessment system allows formative, interim and summative testing to be aligned components that support each other Assessment results from all three tests (formative, interim and summative) will be reported on the same reporting system Formative Teacher resource Formative tests & test questions Instructional resources Interim Fall and Midyear adaptive assessments Fall to spring growth Similar to summative Includes two writing prompts Summative Spring adaptive assessments Used for state reporting and accountability reports 2014 fall results; 2015 immediate results Includes two writing prompts 14

SAGE Training Tests Purpose The intention of the Training Test is to teach students how each of the different item types functions. Audience Students should experience the Training Test with the support of a teacher so the tests capabilities (i.e. text-to-speech, annotation, writing, etc.) can be explained. This could be done in a school computer lab, a classroom mobile lab, or on 1-to-1 student computers. Teachers should not simply assign students to take the Training Test on their own as homework. Scoring The Training Test will not score student submissions. Message to the Field Teachers and students are encouraged to participate in training tests Dont be discouraged Keep in mind, the items are for a grade span that may represent potential difficult items to assess high performing students 15

SAGE Math Calculator Use Refer to SAGE TAM & Accommodations Policy Grades 3 – 4 No calculator IEPs may appropriately include calculator use for a modified test Grade 5-7 Two Sections Calculators used No calculator allowed Grade 8 – Math III Calculators used Accommodations policy Use of math tools allowed One year only adjustments to accommodate field test 5 th grade – short calculator section 7 th grade – short non calculator section 16

SAGE Science Calculator Use Refer to SAGE TAM & Accommodations Policy Calculators allowed for all science tests 17

SAGE Student Scores Standard-setting process: Broad range of stakeholders (210 participants) Ordered Item Booklet Impact data, including national and international benchmarks Resolution process to ensure consistency across grades State Board of Education approves the process and cut scores. Cut scores determine what scale score = proficiency Message to the Field The process to determine student scores and level of proficiency will use current assessment industry standards. The process and outcome will be reviewed and approved by the Technical Advisory Committee (assessment expertise in and outside of Utah) and the State Board of Education 18

SAGE Reporting Immediate Results Interim fall 2014 Summative spring 2015 Formative, Interim and Summative results Interim and Summative results link to formative tools Student Reports Classroom Reports School Reports SAGE Reporting System will extend current system Gateway – Public Reporting Data Display – Password protected data for Educator use Individual student reports 19

SAGE Reporting Message to the Field Immediate Results Interim fall 2014 Summative spring 2015 Formative, Interim and Summative results Interim and Summative results link to formative tools The SAGE reporting system will be an electronic tool that provides data in a variety of ways far beyond what has existed in the past for state testing. 20

SAGE Timeline April – June Summative Testing June - August Assessment data analysis and review August Standard Setting September Student results released to LEAs OctoberAccountability reports released to LEAs for 30 day review Nov/DecAccountability reports released to public Message to the Field The SAGE timeline is right on schedule 21

Communication Plan Audience specific brochures Educators Legislators Family Targeted Outreach meetings UEA LEAs Local Boards District specialist meetings District Superintendents Charter Directors Business (Prosperity 2020, SL Chamber) Materials and Templates for LEAs Develop materials to assist you in your messaging 22

Help? Help Desk Judy Park, Associate Superintendent cell office Kurt Farnsworth, Assessment Coordinator Julie Quinn, Assessment Coordinator

Questions? 24