Is Schrödinger’s Cat Alive in 2030?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Metro DTA Workshop: August 15 th, 2012 Road Diet DTA Methodology PM 5-hr trip tables (2pm-7pm) were transposed to represent reverse directionality on network.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Environmental Externality Avoided Cost.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
MORPC Model Comparison Project Trip vs. Tour Model.
Comparing Aggregate Trip- Based and Disaggregate Tour-Based Travel Demand Models: Columbus Highway Results.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Planning Process ► Early Transport Planning  Engineering-oriented  1944, First “ O-D ” study  Computational advances helped launch new era in planning.
Update of EEA´s Core Set Indicator th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Bern, 30 th September 2014 Alberto González Ortiz Project Manager – AQ data.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Microsimulation of Intra-Urban Commercial Vehicle and Person Movements 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Session 11: May 8,
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Making Way for Public Rapid Transit in South Asia and its Impact on Energy and Environment Bangalore, Dhaka and Colombo Ranjan Kumar Bose & Sharad Gokhale.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
September, 2012An Activity Based Model for a Regional City1.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
1 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting.
TRB Planning Applications May 2009, Houston,TX Changing assignment algorithms: the price of better convergence Michael Florian and Shuguang He INRO.
Ohio Statewide Model Passenger Transit Calibration Pat Costinett Greg Erhardt Rebekah Anderson.
The Impact of Short-term Climate Variations on Predicted Surface Ozone Concentrations in the Eastern US 2020 and beyond Shao-Hang Chu and W.M. Cox US Environmental.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
AIR QUALITY IN SLOVENIA Anton Planinšek Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Application of Accelerated User Equilibrium Traffic Assignments Howard Slavin Jonathan Brandon Andres Rabinowicz Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation.
On Comparing Aggregate Trip-Based and Disaggregate Tour-Based Travel Demand Models.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Do Mobility-Based Performance Measures Reflect Emissions Trends? Congestion and Emissions Co-performance Alex Bigazzi & Dr. Miguel Figliozzi ITE Western.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Quantify Uncertainty in Travel Forecasts
Domestic Investment as a Drive of Economic Growth in Libya
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Network Attributes Calculator
Developing External and Truck Trips for a Regional Travel Model
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
Random Variable.
DEVELOPMENT OF A FLEXIBLE ZONING SYSTEM
Testing the Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Yijing Lu (Baltimore Metropolitan Council)
LESSON 11 – WHILE LOOPS UNIT 5 – 1/10/17.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Chrissy Bernardo, Peter Vovsha, Gaurav Vyas (WSP),
After Evans: Working on an Approximation of a Combined Equilibrium Model Based on Precision Assignment May, 2011 TRB Planning Applications Conference,
Integrated Dynamic/AB Models: Getting Real Discussion
אמצעי מדיניות להפחתת זיהום אוויר במרכזי הערים
Random Variable.
Lecture 23 Section Mon, Oct 25, 2004
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
A Low Carbon Future of Transport: an Integrated Transport Model Coupling with Computable General Equilibrium Model Shiyu Yan (Economic and Social Research.
Chapter 11 Probability.
Presentation transcript:

Is Schrödinger’s Cat Alive in 2030? Effects of Rolling Dice or Is Schrödinger’s Cat Alive in 2030?

Model Set-Up Socio-Economic Core Model Data Java 3 Iterations Networks 4 Period Highway and Transit Assignments

Discrete Choice Effects Three Ways to Run the Model All Choices, Including Household and Person Files, Are Allowed to Vary Household and Person Files Remain Constant – Tour Generation, Distribution, Mode Choice Vary - Standard Run Household and Person Files, Tour Generation and Distribution Remain Constant – Mode Choice Varies (FTA New Starts Version – No Feedback)

Model Formulation

2030 Model Runs Standard Run – Equilibrium Assignment with Gap=.001 Variable HH Run – Equilibrium Assignment with Gap=.00001

Total VMT - Regular Run

Total VMT - 0.00001 Gap

Total VMT - Variable Run

Total VMT

Freeway VMT

Arterial/Collector VMT

VMT by District

VMT by Ring

VMT by Ring 9

VMT by Sector

Non-Attainment Area

Ozone Redesignation Ran the Model Several Times to Assess the Impacts of Variability Ran the Assignments Through ODOT’s Air Quality Analysis Post-Processor Link Volumes by Hour, by Direction, by Functional Class x Emission Factors

Ozone Redesignation

HC

NOx

CO

PM2.5

What That Means for the Cat No Run Was Off the Final Average for Any Pollutant by More than +/- 0.2%. PM2.5 Was More Variable than HC, NOx, or CO. Number of Equilibrium Iterations Affected the Final Outcome More than the Realization Effects. In Columbus, the Cat is Always Alive in 2030.

Count Coefficient of Variation Sampling Error Inherent in Traffic Counts Coef of Variation = St. Dev. / Mean USDOT’s “Guide to Urban Traffic Counting” Indicates Sampling Error for 24 Hour Counts is: CV = (3.706633/ln(COUNT))-0.264598

Link Coefficient of Variation

Link Coefficient of Variation

Link Coefficient of Variation CVcount = (3.706633/ln(COUNT)) - 0.264598 CVregular = (0.631385/ln(24 Hr Volume)) - 0.059902 CVvariable = (0.258741/ln(24 Hr Volume)) - 0.011584

Link Coefficient of Variation

Link Coefficient of Variation

Link Coefficient of Variation

Mr. Zhuojun Jiang – MORPC 614-233-4147 Ms. Rebekah Anderson – ODOT Photo Credits: JM http://www.logodesignweb.com/stockphoto Scientific American Mr. Zhuojun Jiang – MORPC 614-233-4147 Ms. Rebekah Anderson – ODOT 614-752-5735 Thanks also to Greg Giaimo.