Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
The Unique N Terminus of the UbcH10 E2 Enzyme Controls the Threshold for APC Activation and Enhances Checkpoint Regulation of the APC  Matthew K. Summers,
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
AMP Is a True Physiological Regulator of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase by Both Allosteric Activation and Enhancing Net Phosphorylation  Graeme J. Gowans,
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
The Histone Variant MacroH2A1 Is a BRCA1 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrate
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 159, Issue 7, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e15 (April 2017)
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e7 (September 2017)
Takashi Nakagawa, David J. Lomb, Marcia C. Haigis, Leonard Guarente 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e8 (April 2017)
The Mitochondrial Acylome Emerges: Proteomics, Regulation by Sirtuins, and Metabolic and Disease Implications  Chris Carrico, Jesse G. Meyer, Wenjuan.
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Mechanisms and Dynamics of Protein Acetylation in Mitochondria
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Recognition of Histone H3K14 Acylation by MORF
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
CLOCK Acetylates ASS1 to Drive Circadian Rhythm of Ureagenesis
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Synthetic Chromatin Acylation by an Artificial Catalyst System
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
SIRT3 Mediates Multi-Tissue Coupling for Metabolic Fuel Switching
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Protein Phosphorylation and Prevention of Cytochrome Oxidase Inhibition by ATP: Coupled Mechanisms of Energy Metabolism Regulation  Rebeca Acin-Perez,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 605-617 (April 2014) Lysine Glutarylation Is a Protein Posttranslational Modification Regulated by SIRT5  Minjia Tan, Chao Peng, Kristin A. Anderson, Peter Chhoy, Zhongyu Xie, Lunzhi Dai, Jeongsoon Park, Yue Chen, He Huang, Yi Zhang, Jennifer Ro, Gregory R. Wagner, Michelle F. Green, Andreas S. Madsen, Jessica Schmiesing, Brett S. Peterson, Guofeng Xu, Olga R. Ilkayeva, Michael J. Muehlbauer, Thomas Braulke, Chris Mühlhausen, Donald S. Backos, Christian A. Olsen, Peter J. McGuire, Scott D. Pletcher, David B. Lombard, Matthew D. Hirschey, Yingming Zhao  Cell Metabolism  Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 605-617 (April 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Lysine Deglutarylation and Glutaryl-CoA Pathways (A) Structures of glutaryl-lysine, succinyl-lysine, and malonyl-lysine. (B) Illustration of glutaryl-CoA synthetic pathways. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Detection and Verification of Lysine Glutarylation (A) Specificity of the anti-Kglu antibody. Dot blot assay was carried out using anti-Kglu antibody by incubation of the peptide libraries bearing a fixed unmodified K, Kac, Kmal, Ksucc, and Kglu, respectively. Each peptide library contains 10 residues, CXXXXKXXXX, where X is a mixture of 19 amino acids (excluding cysteine), C is cysteine, and the sixth residue is a fixed lysine residue: unmodified lysine (K), acetyl-lysine (Kac), malonyl-lysine (Kmal), succinyl-lysine (Ksucc), and glutaryl-lysine (Kglu). (B) Western blot of the whole-cell lysates from bacteria E. coli, yeast S. cerevisiae, Drosophila S2, mouse MEF, and human HeLa cells. Western blot was performed using the whole-cell lysates from different cells. (C) High-resolution MS/MS spectra of an E. coli tryptic peptide (SK+114.0281DaATNLLYTR) from DNA starvation/stationary phase protection protein with a mass shift of +114.0281 Da at the lysine residue (bottom) and the synthetic SKgluATNLLYTR (top). Inset shows the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the precursor ions. (D) Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of the synthetic peptide SKgluATNLLYTR (top), the in vivo-derived peptide (middle, from E. coli), and their mixture (bottom) by reverse-phase HPLC analysis. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SIRT5 Catalyzes Lysine Deglutarylation Reactions In Vitro and In Vivo (A) Screening of HDAC lysine deglutarylation activity in vitro. Fluorometric assay to detect in vitro lysine deglutarylation activities using recombinant SIRT1-7. (B) 32P-NAD+ consumption monitored by thin-layer chromatography after an in vitro SIRT3, SIRT4, or SIRT5 enzymatic assay using chemically acylated BSA as a substrate; o-glutaryl-ADP ribose, OG-ADPR; o-succinyl-ADP ribose, OS-ADPR; o-acetyl-ADP ribose, OA-ADPR. (C) HPLC trace of a glutarylated peptide, VKSKgluATNLWW, before and after in vitro deglutarylation reaction. The assays were carried out without hSIRT5, with hSIRT5, with enzymatically inactive mutant of hSIRT5 (H158Y), without NAD+, with SIRT5 in the presence of nicotinamide (25 mM), sirtinol (200 μM), TSA (2 μM), or sodium butyrate (NaBu) (25 mM). A triangle and a diamond indicate modified (HRMS, m/z, 673.8588 Da) and unmodified (HRMS, m/z, 616.8439 Da) peptides, respectively. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Enzymology Studies on SIRT5-Catalyzed Deglutarylation (A) Endpoint deacylation assay of mouse or human wild-type SIRT5 or human mutant SIRT5 (HY mutant) against acylated monolysine-AMC substrates; Kac, acetyl; Kmal, malonyl; Ksucc, succinyl; Kglu, glutaryl; Kadi, adipoyl. Error bars in this figure and subsequent ones represent standard error of the mean (SEM). (B) Crystal structure of SIRT5 with a glutarylated peptide superimposed in the catalytic pocket. (C) Summary of total interaction energy comprising the sum of Van der Waals and electrostatic interaction energies between SIRT5 and acylated histone peptides (shown in Figure S4D). Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Proteomic and Bioinformatic Analyses of Kglu Substrates in WT and SIRT5KO Mouse Liver (A) Western blotting analysis of mitochondria from Sirt5+/+ (WT) and Sirt5−/− (KO) mouse livers. (B) Distribution of Kglu sites per protein identified by proteomic analysis. (C) Gene ontology (GO) of biological processes (BP) of proteins identified as glutarylated by proteomics. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Carbamoyl Phosphate Synthase 1 Is Targeted for Deglutarylation by SIRT5 (A) CPS1 was immunoprecipitated from SIRT5 WT and KO mouse liver under fed and 48 hr fasted conditions and measured for glutarylation levels using an anti-Kglu antibody. (B) CPS1 enzymatic activity was measured in hepatic lysates in SIRT5 WT and KO mice, and presented relative to WT control mice. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). (C) CPS1 was immunoprecipitated from HeLa cells containing a shScramble (SCR) or shSIRT5 and measured for glutarylation levels using an anti-Kglu antibody. (D) Ammonia levels from HeLa cells containing a shScramble (SCR) or shSIRT5 after 24 hr of serum starvation. Error bars represent SEM. (E) Ornithine levels from HeLa cells containing a shScramble (SCR) or shSIRT5 after 24 hr of serum starvation. Error bars represent SEM. (F) CPS1 was transfected in HEK293 cells containing a shScramble (SCR) or shSIRT5, immunoprecipitated, and measured for glutarylation levels using an anti-Kglu antibody. (G) CPS1 was transfected in HEK293 cells and immunopurified. Glutarylation levels were measured using an anti-Kglu antibody in four samples: CPS1, glutarylated CPS1 that was chemically modified with glutaric anhydride (GA), glutarylated CPS1 after incubation with recombinant human SIRT5, and glutarylated CPS1 after incubation with recombinant human SIRT5 HY mutant. (H) A homology model of human CPS1 was built based on an E. coli CarA homologous region (light gray), encompassing an inactive glutamine amidotransferase domain (teal), and an E. coli CarB homologous region (dark gray) containing two ATP grasp domains (cyan), an oligomerization domain (blue), and a NAG-binding site (magenta). Glutarylated lysine residues targeted for SIRT5 removal are labeled and highlighted in yellow. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Physiology and Pathophysiology of Lysine Glutarylation (A) Protein glutarylation was measured in hepatic whole-tissue lysates by immunoblotting with an anti-Kglu antibody in two sets (mouse 1 and mouse 2) of SIRT5 WT and KO mice that were fed or fasted (48 hr), respectively. (B) Drosophilia were fed with 0×, 1×, or 2× tryptophan for 1 week, and whole-cell lysates were prepared for western blotting analysis. (C) Hepatic mitochondrial protein glutarylation and succinylation were measured by immunoblotting with anti-acyl-lysine antibodies in WT and glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase knockout (GCDHKO) mice. (D) CPS1 was immunoprecipitated from GCDHKO mouse liver and measured for glutarylation levels using an anti-Kglu antibody. (E) CPS1 enzymatic activity was measured in hepatic lysates from wild-type and GCDHKO mice and normalized to total CPS1 protein levels. Error bars represent SEM. (F) Glutaryl-CoA or glutarate was incubated with heat-inactivated hepatic mitochondrial lysates and monitored for changes in protein glutarylation using an anti-Kglu antibody. Cell Metabolism 2014 19, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions