TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 16 -Negative Mass Instability 2 Consider two particles in a bunch. Below transition.
Advertisements

Fiber Optics Communication
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
V Ring of charge that generates EM field around it [2] z r Dipole case: - charge modulated by cos  - dipole moment P = Qa Q To compute the wake function,
 Some thoughts about longitudinal impedance (real part) values at low frequencies F. Caspers Some thoughts about longitudinal impedance at low frequency.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
Consider a time dependent electric field E(t) acting on a metal. Take the case when the wavelength of the field is large compared to the electron mean.
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
Mathematical Models and Numerical Investigation for the Eigenmodes of the Modern Gyrotron Resonators Oleksiy KONONENKO RF Structure Development Meeting,
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Elias Métral, CERN Accelerator School, Darmstadt, Germany, October 3rd, 2009 /221 TRANSVERSE INSTABILITIES E. Métral (CERN) Time (20 ns/div)  The purpose.
The University of Delaware
Agenda: General kickers analysis Wang-Tsutsui method for computing impedances Benchmarks Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgments: E.Métral, M.Migliorati,
Status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff, B. Salvant.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
So far, we have considered plane waves in an infinite homogeneous medium. A natural question would arise: what happens if a plane wave hits some object?
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
Outline: Motivation Comparisons with: > Thick wall formula > CST Thin inserts models Tests on the Mode Matching Method Webmeeting N.Biancacci,
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Lecture 2. Review lecture 1 Wavelength: Phase velocity: Characteristic impedance: Kerchhoff’s law Wave equations or Telegraphic equations L, R, C, G ?
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
N. Mounet and E. Métral - ICE meeting - 16/03/201 General wall impedance theory for 2D axisymmetric and flat multilayer structures N. Mounet and E. Métral.
N. Mounet and E. Métral - HB /10/20101 News on the 2D wall impedance theory N. Mounet (EPFL/ CERN) and E. Métral (CERN) Thesis supervisor : Prof.
1 Update on the impedance of the SPS kickers E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini SPS impedance meeting - Oct. 16 th 2009 Acknowledgments: F. Caspers,
Elias Métral, LHC collimation working group meeting, 17/07/061/26 E. Métral for the RLC team LATEST ESTIMATES OF COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE EFFECTS u Reminder:
8. Wave Guides and Cavities 8A. Wave Guides Suppose we have a region bounded by a conductor We want to consider oscillating fields in the non-conducting.
Computation of Resistive Wakefields Adina Toader and Roger Barlow The University of Manchester ILC-CLIC Beam Dynamics CERN th June.
EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 2 By Rasime Uyguroglu.
Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06 1/15 TRANSVERSE LANDAU.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 2
ECEN5341/4341 Spring 2017 Lecture 2 January 20,2017.
Chapter 11. The uniform plane wave
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Kickers analysis and benchmark
Maxwell’s Equations.
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
New results on impedances, wake fields and electromagnetic fields in an axisymmetric beam pipe N. Mounet and E. Métral Acknowledgements: B. Salvant, B.
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
General wall impedance theory for 2D axisymmetric and flat multilayer structures N. Mounet and E. Métral Acknowledgements: N. Biancacci, F. Caspers, A.
PLANE WAVE PROPAGATION
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
RF Cavities & Waveguides
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
LHC INJECTION SEPTUM MSI (1/3)
Invited talk TOAC001 ( min, 21 slides)
N. Mounet, G. Rumolo and E. Métral
LHC COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
Electromagnetic fields in a resistive cylindrical beam pipe
Electromagnetic fields in a resistive cylindrical beam pipe
ELECTROSTATICS - INTRODUCTION
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 2
Na Wang and Qing Qin Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini (CERN – BE-ABP-LIS)
NEWS ABOUT COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
Impedance in a flat and infinite chamber: a new model
Impedance analysis for collimator and beam screen in LHC and Resistive Wall Instability Liu Yu Dong.
Elias Métral ( min, 19 slides)
Power loss in the LHC beam screen at 7 TeV due to the multi-layer longitudinal impedance N. Mounet and E. Métral Goal: Check the effect of the multi-layer.
Tune Shift Induced by Flat-Chamber Resistive Wall Impedance
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
ECEN5341/4341 Spring 2019 Lecture 2 January 16,2019.
Status of the EM simulations and modeling of ferrite loaded kickers
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Transmission Lines and Waveguides
1st Week Seminar Sunryul Kim Antennas & RF Devices Lab.
Presentation transcript:

TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY Elias Métral (25 + 5 min, 25 slides) “Low-frequency” regime Introduction and motivation Numerical applications for a LHC collimator (vs. Burov-Lebedev2002 and Bane1991) SPS MKE kicker (vs. Burov-Lebedev and 2-wire measurements) Review of Zotter’s theory ( For a circular beam pipe) Any number of layers Any beam velocity Any frequency  Unification of 3 regimes (BL, “thick-wall” and Bane) Any σ (conductivity), ε (permittivity) and μ (permeability) Conclusion and work in progress High-frequency regime Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

THE MOTIVATION: THE LHC GRAPHITE COLLIMATORS INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION (1/2) THE MOTIVATION: THE LHC GRAPHITE COLLIMATORS First unstable betatron line Skin depth for graphite (ρ = 10 μΩm) Collimator thickness   One could think that the classical “thick-wall” formula would be about right Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION (2/2) In fact it is not  The resistive impedance is ~ 2 orders of magnitude lower at ~ 8 kHz !  A new physical regime was revealed by the LHC collimators Usual regime : New regime : Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

N.A. FOR A LHC COLLIMATOR (1/4) COMPARISON ZOTTER2005-BUROV&LEBEDEV2002 Classical thick-wall BL’s results (real and imag. parts) in black: dots without and lines with copper coating Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

N.A. FOR A LHC COLLIMATOR (2/4) GLOBAL PLOT FROM ZOTTER2005 Low beam velocity case (e.g. PSB : , ) Same as Bane1991 Negative AC conductivity Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

N.A. FOR A LHC COLLIMATOR (4/4) Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

N.A. FOR A SPS MKE KICKER Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (1/17) 1) Maxwell equations In the frequency domain, all the field quantities are taken to be proportional to Combining the conduction and displacement current terms yields with Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (2/17) 2) Scalar Helmholtz equations for the longitudinal field components Using , one obtains (using the circular cylindrical coordinates r, θ, z) The homogeneous equation can be solved by separation of variables Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (3/17) m is called the azimuthal mode number (m=1 for pure dipole oscillations)  and k is called the wave number Reinserting the time dependence ( ), the axial motion is seen to be a wave proportional to , with phase velocity which may in general differ from the beam velocity R (r) is given by with Radial propagation constant The solutions of this differential equation are the modified Bessel functions and Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (4/17) Conclusion for the homogeneous scalar Helmholtz equations For pure dipole oscillations excited by a horizontal cosine modulation propagating along the particle beam, one can write the solutions for Hz and Ez as Sine and cosine are interchanged for a purely vertical excitation (see source fields) Only the solutions of the homogeneous Helmholtz equations are needed since all the regions considered are source free except the one containing the beam where the source terms have been determined separately by Gluckstern (CERN yellow report 2000-011)  See slide 14 C1,2 and D1,2 are constants to be determined Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (5/17) 3) Transverse field components deduced from the longitudinal ones using Maxwell equations (in a source-free region) Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (6/17) 4) Source of the fields: Ring-beam distribution  Infinitesimally short, annular beam of charge and radius traveling with velocity along the axis Charge density in the frequency domain where is the horizontal dipole moment Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (7/17) Longitudinal source terms (from Gluckstern)  Valid for , i.e. in the vacuum between the beam and the pipe = region (1) with and will be determined by the boundary conditions at b and d Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (8/17) 5) The total (i.e. resistive-wall + space charge) horizontal impedance  with L the length of the resistive pipe and Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (9/17) The space-charge impedance is obtained with a perfect conductor at r = b, i.e. when and , with  If  and  Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (10/17) The resistive-wall impedance is obtained by subtracting the space-charge impedance from the total impedance  Only remains to be determined (by field matching) Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (11/17) 6) Field matching At the interfaces of 2 layers (r = constant) all field strength components have to be matched, i.e. in the absence of surface charges and currents the tangential field strengths and have to be continuous Then the radial components of the displacement and of the induction are also continuous, i.e. matching of the radial components is redundant At a Perfect Conductor (PC) :  At a Perfect Magnet (PM) :  At r  Infinity  Only is permitted as diverges Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (12/17) General form of the field strengths in region (p) (Ep, Gp, αp and ηp) are constants to be determined … Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (13/17) 7) General 1-layer formula α2 and η2 are determined by the boundary conditions at the outer chamber wall r = d Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (14/17) d  , or PC or PM (2) Layer 1 d   Perfect Conductor (PC) (1) Vacuum Beam a b Perfect Magnet (PM) d Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (15/17) 8) General 2-layer formula where the parameters (E2, α2) are 2 parameters out of 4 (α2, η2, E2 and G2) which have to be found by solving the matching equations at each layer boundary. The 4 unknowns are given by the following system of 4 linear equations Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (16/17) 1,2,3 refer to the vacuum (between the beam and the first layer), the first and second layer respectively Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

REVIEW OF ZOTTER’S THEORY (17/17) (3) Layer 2 e  , or PC or PM (2) Layer 1 (1) Vacuum e   Beam a b d e Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06

CONCLUSION AND WORK IN PROGRESS Zotter2005’s formula has been compared to other approaches from Burov-Lebedev2002, Tsutsui2003 (theory and HFSS simulations) and Vos2003 (see Ref. 6 below)  Similar results obtained in the new (Burov-Lebedev2002) low-frequency regime Work in Progress Multi-bunch or “long” bunch  Wave velocity  Beam velocity Finite length of the resistive beam pipe REFERENCES [1] B. Zotter, CERN-AB-2005-043 (2005) [2] R.L. Gluckstern, CERN yellow report 2000-011 (2000) [3] E. Métral, CERN-AB-2005-084 (2005) [4] A. Burov and V. Lebedev, EPAC’02 (2002) [5] K. L.F. Bane, SLAC/AP-87 (1991) [6] F. Caspers et al., EPAC’04 (2004) [7] H. Tsutsui, LHC-PROJECT-NOTE-318 (2003) [8] L. Vos, CERN-AB-2003-005-ABP (2003) and CERN-AB-2003-093-ABP (2003) Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06