Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /569r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE /1348 Multiple NAVs for Spatial Reuse Date: Slide 1IITP Authors: Nov 2015 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Evgeny.
Doc.: IEEE /0619r3 Submission May 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE /599r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 ‘Cyclic Prioritized Multiple Access (CPMA): An Access Mechanism.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment
Station Group Management for ah
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Support for Deferral Management in v
Channel Access Efficiency
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
Splicing in a Mesh Network
Importance of Overlapped BSS issue in ac
120MHz channelization solution
Interference Management for TVWS Networks
Support for Deferral Management in v
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Splicing in a Mesh Network
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
VHT BSS Channel Selection
Interference Management for TVWS Networks
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Neighborhood Capture and OBSS
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Useful Radio Statistics
Improved CCA for 80 and 160 MHz BSSs
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Proposed MAC Extensions for 11n/s/p
Outdoor Mesh MAC Protocol Issues & Considerations
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
NAV Clearing: Problems and Proposed Remedy
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
‘Shield’: Protecting High-Priority Channel Access Attempts
Reducing Channel Access Delay
LC MAC submission – follow up
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
IEEE Wireless Local Area Networks (RF-LANs)
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Measurements for Distributed-MU-MIMO
Presentation transcript:

Overlapping coverage issues with 802.11n BSSs April 2006 Overlapping coverage issues with 802.11n BSSs M. Benveniste M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs)

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Abstract Use of an extension channel should not lower aggregate throughput of a WLAN system (relative to having no extension channel) Channel sharing by OBSS, enabled by CSMA/CA and virtual carrier sensing, addresses the limited availability of channels Avoiding collisions in OBSS through RF resource management (i.e. restricting channel sharing by BSSs with coverage overlap) could decrease aggregate throughput Virtual carrier is important for both control and extension channels M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Overlapping Coverage With 40 MHz tx, BSSs with coverage overlap may share one or both of their channels 4 overlap situations: BSSs use the same control and extension channels BSSs use same extension channel but different control channel The control channel of one BSS is the extension channel of the other BSSs use the same control channel but different extension channels When one channel is shared, we have POBSS = partially overlapping BSS M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Virtual Carrier Sensing – RTS/CTS Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Virtual Carrier Sensing – RTS/CTS RTS/CTS helps avoid collisions between 20 MHz tx in OBSSs (using the same control channel) RTS/CTS can prevent collisions with 40 MHz tx only in POBSS cases 1 and 4 POBSS cases 2 and 3 would be more common M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Channel sharing by BSSs with overlapping coverage Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Channel sharing by BSSs with overlapping coverage The available channels are not enough to provide all BSSs with overlapping coverage a separate channel BSSs must share channels; CSMA/CA makes that easy Since the extension channel is used less heavily than the control channel, it is better for BSSs with coverage overlap to share the same extension channel use one’s control channel as the other’s extension channel M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Sharing extension channel – POBSS Case 2 – results in collisions Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Sharing extension channel – POBSS Case 2 – results in collisions BSSs A and B have coverage overlap; they use different control channels, but the same extension channel AP A hears no transmission when station 1 is transmitting on the extension channel A 40 MHz transmission when CCA (on the control channel) indicates inactivity on extension channel would cause collision with station 1’s tx 1 A B M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Sharing control/extension channel – POBSS Case 3 – results in collisions BSSs A and B have coverage overlap; A uses as control channel B’s extension channel If station 1 is transmitting on the extension channel, AP A hears no transmission A 40 MHz transmission when CCA (on the control channel) indicates inactivity on extension channel would cause collision with station 1’s tx 1 A B M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Virtual Carrier Sense for POBSS Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Virtual Carrier Sense for POBSS To avoid collisions in POBSSs, the extension channel should be monitored independently RTS/CTS on both the control extension channel should be decoded within interference range and NAVs should be maintained M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 April 2006 Conclusions Use of an extension channel should not lower aggregate throughput of a WLAN system (relative to no extension channel) Maintaining a NAV on both the extension and the control channel is desirable, as it enables channel sharing by POBSS with collision avoidance M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) John Doe, His Company