University of Wisconsin-Madison

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.

Advertisements

1 James N. Bellinger 4-Feb-2009 ME+1 status and Endcap Z James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 4-Feb-2009.

Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.

Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.

Geometry: Dilations. We have already discussed translations, reflections and rotations. Each of these transformations is an isometry, which means.

Velo to T Alignment - Reminder General Strategy  Perform relative VELO-to-IT/OT alignment using  X,  Y at the center of magnet and  X,  Y (each.

January 26, 2015 What are we doing today? 6.1 – Perimeter and Area of Rectangles and Parallelograms -Lecture and Vocabulary -HW – Practice B & C Due: Tomorrow.

Analog Alignment Sensors Status report – April 2004 Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech.

Muon Endcap Alignment Analog Sensor Calibrations & Software Update Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech October 2005 USCMS EMU meeting – Fermilab,

First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.

Partial Disassembly of the alignment devices on each ME11transfer plate, ME1/1 chamber and ME1/2 chamber. (6 on +Z and 6 on –Z side of the CMS)

Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB Target DM distance DMdowel to DCOPS dowel DCOPS dowel to center.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.

+ C.2.5 – Volumes of Revolution Calculus - Santowski 12/5/2015Calculus - Santowski.

November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.

Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,

Lesson #28 - Surface Area of Prisms.

Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.

Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13 February 2008 Cocoa Plans.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13-August-2010 Endcap Processing Notes James N. Bellinger 13-Aug-2010.

M. Lefebvre, 19 June 2003HEC-EMEC beam test geometry1 Nominal Beam Test Coordinate System Let S(x,y,z) be the “nominal beam test” coordinate system  It.

EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 25-February-2011 Z-sensor News James N. Bellinger 25-February-2011 Good news this time!

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.

1 James N. Bellinger Robert Handler University of Wisconsin-Madison 11-Monday-2009 Laser fan non-linearity James N. Bellinger 20-March-2009.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 30 January 2008 DCOPS Software Report.

Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010.

James Bellinger, December CMS Week Muon Alignment James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 5-December-2006 DCOPS Data from MTCC2.

10 mm is the same as... 1 cm. 20 mm is the same as... 2 cm.

Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac

Intra-Tower Tracker Alignment Instrument Analysis Workshop 4

Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison

Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment

Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction

Plus Endcap Transfer Lines

Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison

DCOPS Readout before and during MTCC

DCOPS Monitoring of Iron Bending

University of Wisconsin at Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin at Madison BMU Alignment Corrections

Validating Transfer Line Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison

Starting from the Basics

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Comparing Laser Fit to Barrel Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison

Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

CMS Week Muon Alignment

Transfer Line Calculations

University of Wisconsin at Madison

SCT Wafer Distortions (Bowing)

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Beam dynamics requirements on MQT

Presentation transcript:

University of Wisconsin-Madison Cocoa ME+1 vs PG James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 9-March-2009

Data used 0T 3.8T PG Distancemeter 16-Nov average DCOPS 11-Nov event Link from Celso 3.8T Distancemeter 1-4 Nov average DCOPS 27-Oct event PG PG within disk UR-0058 (2006) (Oleg cleaned it up) Supplementary UR-0103 (2008) PG of disk UR-0124 (after Craft) James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Fit Ring (average of all chambers) Position Deviations from Ideal 0T-Ideal X Y Z 3.8T- Ideal +1/3 .74 -.76 -.94 .79 -.68 -2.18 +1/2 .98 -.98 1.59 1.10 -.97 -6.27 PG (disk) .58 -1.37 0.57 NA James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Cocoa Fit Ideal vs DDD Only 6 entries. Cocoa Ideal minus DDD geometry Ring 3 only Mean microns RMS X-xddd -17 69 Y-yddd -55 52 Z-zddd -7 1 James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Blessing for ME+1/3 chamber Z? 0T Pos mm 0T Tilt mrad 3.8T Pos mm 3.8T Tilt mrad ME+1/3_03 6866.29 -0.5 6864.532 1.53 ME+1/3_09 6863.06 -0.83 6863.053 1.99 ME+1/3_14 6864.58 -1.14 6864.728 1.09 ME+1/3_20 6869.03 0.41 6867.583 2.63 ME+1/3_27 6870 -1.93 6866.901 -0.69 Average 6866.59 -0.8 6863.36 1.3 Δ from nominal -0.85mm -0.8mrad -4.08mm 1.3mrad James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Displays now available Omitting lines illustrating chamber surface Triangles show the slope well enough PG information not displayed Diagram is very cluttered already HSLM1-5 are animated to show 0 to 3.8T shifts HSLM6 has bad data for the DCOPS at 3.8T and bad Z information for the distancemeter HSLM3 probably has bad distancemeter data also James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Distancemeter and dists Chamber surface estimates Red=Real Green=Sim DCOPS dowels Chamber surface estimates Red=Real Green=Sim ME12 ASPD IR target MAB ASPD ASPD P4 Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

3.8T is bad IR target obscured, Z is bad James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

BACKUP MATERIAL James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

0T ME+1/2 Cocoa vs Ideal 6 measured centers Overall rotation and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

0T ME+1/3 Cocoa vs Ideal 5 measured centers Overall rotation and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

3.8T ME+1/2 Cocoa vs Ideal 6 measured centers Overall rotation and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009

3.8T ME+1/3 Cocoa vs Ideal 5 measured centers Overall rotation and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009