Regulation of DNA Damage Responses by Ubiquitin and SUMO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Repair Systems Introduction mismatch repair (MMR) – A type of repair that corrects mispaired bases, typically immediately following replication.
Advertisements

 Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response ◦ Histone ◦ Histone modification ◦ DNA damage ◦ DNA damage response.
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Inhibitors as Cancer Therapeutics
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Felix Dietlein, Lisa Thelen, H. Christian Reinhardt  Trends in Genetics 
Errol C. Friedberg, Alan R. Lehmann, Robert P.P. Fuchs  Molecular Cell 
PCNA Ubiquitination and REV1 Define Temporally Distinct Mechanisms for Controlling Translesion Synthesis in the Avian Cell Line DT40  Charlotte E. Edmunds,
Ubiquitination Accomplished: E1 and E2 Enzymes Were Not Necessary
CHIPping Away at Base Excision Repair
The Intertwined Roles of Transcription and Repair Proteins
Schematic diagram of ubiquitin and SUMO modification pathways
The Proteasome: Not Just Degrading Anymore
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Origin of Chromosomal Translocations in Lymphoid Cancer
Yea-Lih Lin, Philippe Pasero  Molecular Cell 
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (July 2009)
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (May 2015)
Jurgen A. Marteijn, Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers, Wim Vermeulen  Molecular Cell 
RNA Processing and Genome Stability: Cause and Consequence
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Inhibitors as Cancer Therapeutics
Oxidative and Energy Metabolism as Potential Clues for Clinical Heterogeneity in Nucleotide Excision Repair Disorders  Mohsen Hosseini, Khaled Ezzedine,
Graeme Hewitt, Viktor I. Korolchuk  Trends in Cell Biology 
DNA Damage and Its Links to Neurodegeneration
Lucas T. Gray, Alan M. Weiner  Molecular Cell 
The TFIIH Subunit Tfb3 Regulates Cullin Neddylation
Playing the End Game: DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice
ATM Creates a Veil of Transcriptional Silence
Gaston Soria, Sophie E. Polo, Geneviève Almouzni  Molecular Cell 
Cancer Susceptibility and the Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2
Katherine N. Choe, George-Lucian Moldovan  Molecular Cell 
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
DNA Double-Strand Breaks Come into Focus
DNA Damage in Stem Cells
PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork
The Met1-Linked Ubiquitin Machinery: Emerging Themes of (De)regulation
Neddylating the Guardian
Fanconi Anemia (Cross)linked to DNA Repair
Andrew N. Blackford, Stephen P. Jackson  Molecular Cell 
The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation
Reconsidering DNA Polymerases at the Replication Fork in Eukaryotes
Avanti Kulkarni, David M. Wilson 
A Histone Code for Chromatin Assembly
Histone Ubiquitination: Triggering Gene Activity
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Bacterial Interference of Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination
Polymerase Stalling during Replication, Transcription and Translation
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Graeme Hewitt, Viktor I. Korolchuk  Trends in Cell Biology 
Epigenome Maintenance in Response to DNA Damage
Histone Chaperones: Modulators of Chromatin Marks
Polymerase Switching in DNA Replication
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Apollo—Taking the Lead in Telomere Protection
NEDD8 Pathways in Cancer, Sine Quibus Non
ATM function in repair of double-stranded DNA breaks.
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Ubiquitin pathway at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.
Back to the Future with Ubiquitin
DCAFs, the Missing Link of the CUL4-DDB1 Ubiquitin Ligase
Are Mouse Telomeres Going to Pot?
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
TGF-β Pathway Inhibition Signals New Hope for Fanconi Anemia
Effects of PARP inhibition on the DNA damage response.
DNA Repair Has a New FAN1 Club
FANCD2 Hurdles the DNA Interstrand Crosslink
53BP1 Goes Back to Its p53 Roots
Cooperation of the FA and BRCA1/2 proteins in a common ICL repair pathway. Cooperation of the FA and BRCA1/2 proteins in a common ICL repair pathway. Stalling.
Presentation transcript:

Regulation of DNA Damage Responses by Ubiquitin and SUMO Stephen P. Jackson, Daniel Durocher  Molecular Cell  Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 795-807 (March 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Ubiquitin and UBL Conjugation Cycle Ubiquitin and SUMO are produced as precursor polypeptides that are first processed to reveal a C-terminal diglycine motif (1). An E1 enzyme then uses ATP to convert this motif into a high-energy-bond containing adenylated derivative, which is short-lived, rapidly reacting with a Cys in the E1 to form a E1∼Ub or E1∼SUMO thioester intermediate (2). The ubiquitin or SUMO moieties are then coupled, via a transesterification reaction, onto a Cys residue in the E2 catalytic site to form E2∼Ub/SUMO intermediates (3). In most cases, an E3 ligase serves as a substrate adaptor, linking the charged E2 and the substrate (4). Ubiquitylation or sumoylation can be reversed by a DUB (for ubiquitin) or a SENP (for SUMO) (5) or the modification cycle can be repeated to produce chains of various topologies (6). The (∗) indicates that other types of enzymes can remove UBL modifications. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The roles of Ubiquitin and SUMO in Postreplication Repair (A) PCNA monoubiquitylation on Lys164 occurs when replication forks encounter lesions (star). The single-stranded DNA is recognized by the Rad18 E3 ligase, which interacts with Rad6, an E2, to ubiquitylate PCNA. PCNA ubiquitylation recruits Y family polymerases such as Polη to bypass the lesion in the process termed translesion synthesis (TLS). In vertebrates the USP1-UAF1 DUB opposes PCNA monoubiquitylation. (B) A second DNA damage tolerance pathway termed template switching occurs when PCNA is polyubiquitylated by the E3 Rad5 and the Ubc13/Mms2 dimeric E2. Template switching employs homologous recombination. (C) In yeast, PCNA sumoylation on its Lys164 residue recruits Srs2, which acts as an antirecombinase by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Role of Ubiquitin in Nucleotide Excision Repair (A) GG-NER promotes the repair of bulky lesions on genomic DNA. The lesions can be recognized by the DDB1-DDB2 and XPC-RAD23 complexes. DDB1-DDB2 forms an E3 with CUL4 and RBX1 (not shown), which leads to DDB2 autoubiquitylation, resulting in its degradation, and XPC polyubiquitylation. XPC is stabilized through its interaction with RAD23, which contains a ubiquitin-like domain that interacts with the proteasome. This allows the subsequent steps of NER, such as the recruitment of XPA. (B) TC-NER repairs bulky lesions occurring on the transcribed DNA strand. RNA polymerase II acts as a lesion sensor. Two independent pathways can occur when RNA polymerase stalls after a lesion encounter. First (going right), TC-NER can be activated, with the CSB and CSA proteins playing a critical role in TC-NER. CSB associates with RNA polymerase and recruits CSA, which forms a CUL4-based E3 with DDB1. The exact nature of the critical substrate of the E3 associated with CSA is not known, but CSB is ubiquitylated and its degradation is delayed by USP7, which is brought to the stalled polymerase by UVSSA. Second (going down), the RNA polymerase can be ubiquitylated, extracted from chromatin, and degraded by the proteasome as a last resort. This pathway, in yeast, is initiated by Rad26-Def1 (not shown), which leads to the Rsp5-dependent ubiquitylation of RNA polymerase. Rsp5 can promote Lys63-ubiquitin chains but the DUB Ubp2 trims these down. Monoubiquitylated RNA polymerase is then a substrate of an Elongin-Cullin 3 complex. The Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains on RNA polymerase enable Cdc48 to extract the stalled polymerase from chromatin, which then leads to its degradation. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Role of Ubiquitin in the Chromatin-Based Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks (A) DSBs trigger the ATM-dependent phosphorylation of H2AX, which is read by MDC1. ATM can also phosphorylate MDC1 to promote the recruitment of RNF8, an E3 ligase. RNF8 ubiquitylates an unknown factor on chromatin (X). This ubiquitylation is then read by the N-terminal ubiquitin binding domains of RNF168. RNF168 ubiquitylates H2A, which provides a second recruitment signal for RNF168. In addition to RNF8/168, DSBs stimulate the recruitment of the BMI1-RING1B, which ubiquitylates H2A on the C terminus. Also shown are DUBs that antagonize this ubiquitylation event. (B) OTUB1 antagonizes RNF168-dependent ubiquitylation by binding to E2s. RNF8 and RNF168 also stimulate the formation of Lys63-linked ubiquitin chains on chromatin. (C) The RNF168-dependent ubiquitylation of chromatin leads to the recruitment of multiple effectors that include 53BP1, which promotes NHEJ, and BRCA1, which promotes HR. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Role of Ubiquitin in the FA Pathway ICLs are potent fork-blocking lesions. DNA replication fork stalling, along with FANCM and associated proteins (not shown), stimulates the recruitment of the multi-subunit FA core complex, which is an E3 ligase. The catalytic subunit of this E3 is FANCL and its E2 is UBE2T. The FA core complex monoubiquitylates FANCD2-FANCI. FANCD2-FANCI ubiquitylation is read by FAN1 and perhaps SLX4, which both contain a UBZ4-type ubiquitin binding domain. The USP1-UAF1 DUB reverses FANCD2-FANCI ubiquitylation and is essential for the FA pathway. The recruitment of nucleases enables incision, unhooking of the lesion, TLS, and HR. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Examples of the Role of SUMO in Multiple DNA Damage Response Pathways (A) Thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG), which acts during BER, is inhibited by the product of its reaction. TDG sumoylation produces a conformational change that enables it to leave DNA. (B) Sumoylation acts at multiple steps during the chromatin-based DSB response. See the main text for details. (C) Sumoylation can also stimulate ubiquitylation through the action of STUbLs, E3 ligases that are recruited to substrates by recognizing sumoylation. In the shown example, RNF4 promotes the turnover of MDC1 from chromatin during the DSB response. Molecular Cell 2013 49, 795-807DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions