Conducting broad, identical, user satisfaction surveys prior and after the launch of a new website - Experiences from Statistics Norway’s user satisfaction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 6. January 7 January 8 January 9 January 10.
Advertisements

Power (Reading Packet Sect III) Mon, March 29 th.
During year 2 of the Catalyst Initiative: The Catalyst Web site logged almost 1.7 million page views, an increase of more than 300%. Educators registered.
Section 2.6 Question 1. Section 2.6 Answer 1 Section 2.6 Question 2.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Communication with users in the Czech Statistical Office Author:
MANAGEMENT OF OPERATIONS METHODS OF PRODUCTION. LEARNING INTENTIONS AND SUCCESS CRITERIA LEARNING INTENTIONS: I understand the different production methods.
The Services Charter of Eustat Cristina Prado / Alicia Barriocanal Helsinki, May 5 th, 2010.
1 Communication with users Norway Anne Skranefjell, Statistics Norway.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Multiplication Facts Table of Contents 0’s 1’s 2’s 3’s 4’s 5’s 6’s 7’s 8’s 9’s 10’s.
SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Statistical Significance Victor I. Piercey February 9, 2010.
Experience of the Statistical Office of Estonia on launching user satisfaction surveys Anne Nuka Head of the Information and Marketing Service.
2/13/2016Copyright © 2015 Robert D. Austin.1 Writing Cases Robert D. Austin.
Senior European Volunteers Exchange Network 3rd Network Meeting Vienna November 30 – December 3, 2009 Charlotte Strümpel Status quo of the on-going evaluation.
User surveys - why and how? Annegrete Wulff Statistics Denmark
Percentage person A has Fraction Person B has Ratio A:B A B %8 = :8 =1:2 26………%……= 8 50% % 3:2 4.
Free Dating Websites Importance of Free Dating Websites With most of us getting busier by each day, getting a date online seems.
Trending Wedding Survey 2014 to 2015
Developing Community Assessments
Adam R. Brown Jeremy C. Pope
Nordic web meeting Copenhagen February 2011.
Some remarks and questions Ragnhild Rein Bore, Statistics Norway
Regulation in practice
The What Works Centre for Crime Reduction: An evaluation
Functional Area Assessment
Introduction to marketing Use in conjunction with the Portakabin case study summary THE TIMES 100.
What has been done in 2007 User survey in February 2007
Ssb.no - launching a new website
Building better services Building better user experiences
Evaluation of Reference Services
Toni Olshen OCUL VDX Project Meeting February 25, 2004
4th Coordination meeting 4th September, Debrecen
Jared Launius and Hojong Kim with RJI fellow Peter Meng
Marcom International for OSHA
Investing In A Great Wedding Photographer Is Important
Sandy Mau, Vice President of Communications, Health2 Resources
Last Call at the Sample Oasis
Brigade Woods near ITPL Brochure
User Satisfaction Surveys in the Czech Statistical Office
2015 Customer Satisfaction Survey - ReMCoDS
& RHP 15 Collaboration.
Using Customer Feedback to Improve Data Delivery
The Value of Reviews Hello everyone! Thanks for joining us today in our weekly sales webinar, today's focus will be the value of reviews for local businesses.
Thursday 12th March 2014 Mr Nicholls
Adapting to the Official Regulations on Accessibility
How to Summarize 11H.
Statistics Norway’s homepage – experiences with content and design
MAP-Works #allaboutYOU.
Organizing Data.
2007 Grants.gov Adobe Forms Solution
MAgrSc Innovation Support Programme
Fostering Next Generation Customer Experience
WLK Partner Survey January – February 2007.
2019 picture monthly calendar
Xoserve IX Refresh Customer Update 12/02/2019.
$ $
2018 picture monthly calendar
Principles of conducting user surveys in Statistics Estonia
ChesapeakeProgress Research Results
RESULTS AND CHALLENGES
Welcome to the new ECSDN website
USER’S PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDE ABOUT E- LEARNING
Minimum data requirement for compiling SUT
Basic Mr. Husch.
Diku Survey for International Students
Workplace Assessment (WPA) February – 13 March 2019
Subject areas structure
8 1 7 Subtraction Facts
EEA and Norway Grants Results and Data Portal
Presentation transcript:

Conducting broad, identical, user satisfaction surveys prior and after the launch of a new website - Experiences from Statistics Norway’s user satisfaction surveys in 2012 - 2014 Dissemination Working Group 2014 Ragnhild Rein Bore (rrb@ssb.no) Head of web and statbank at Statistics Norway

Some facts about the surveys http://www.ssb.no/en/omssb/om-oss/vaar-virksomhet/planer-og-meldinger/user-survey-ssb.no-2014 In 2012 and 2014, user surveys on ssb.no were conducted aimed at mapping users' satisfaction with ssb.no.

Facts about the survey (cont.) Pop-up survey 24 January-26 February 2012 (19 450 responses – 7500 suggestions) Launched new website on March 1 2013 Almost identical pop-up survey 23 January-25 February 2014 (28 238 responses – 10 455 suggestions)

Why so big? Very useful having lots of improvement suggestions both before the launch and after. Next year – only for as long as it takes to get the sufficient amount of responses?

Why identical? Useful in order to see if we’d reached the goal of having more satisfied users Also – convenient… Next year – might do some changes in order to get more specific answers on prioritised content?

What did we learn? Users are satisfied 86 per cent were satisfied in 2012 86 per cent were satisfied in 2014

However – 83 per cent found what they were looking for in 2012 87 per cent found what they were looking for in 2014 Which begs the question: Why not more satisfied user if more people found what they were looking for?

What we’ve learned? Having user satisfaction surveys is actually worth the effort  Big ones is useful in conjunction with major overhauls of a website User satisfaction is no longer our overreaching goal in the running, management and development of our website, but increasing users’ ability to find what they are looking for, is. Especially among prioritised user groups.

What we are wondering? Should we change some of the questions depending on which content we’re prioritising? Should we go smaller? And any other useful input you might have