Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smita Srivastava, Patricia S. Grace, Joel D. Ernst  Cell Host & Microbe 
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
The Interferon-Inducible MxB Protein Inhibits HIV-1 Infection
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Rui Pedro Galão, Suzanne Pickering, Rachel Curnock, Stuart J.D. Neil 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Alice C.L. Len, Shimona Starling, Maitreyi Shivkumar, Clare Jolly 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Brian Yordy, Norifumi Iijima, Anita Huttner, David Leib, Akiko Iwasaki 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Smita Srivastava, Patricia S. Grace, Joel D. Ernst  Cell Host & Microbe 
Phospholipid Scramblase 1 Mediates Type I Interferon-Induced Protection against Staphylococcal α-Toxin  Miroslaw Lizak, Timur O. Yarovinsky  Cell Host.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Hepatitis C Virus Subverts Liver-Specific miR-122 to Protect the Viral Genome from Exoribonuclease Xrn2  Cecilia D. Sedano, Peter Sarnow  Cell Host &
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Autophagy Induction by the Pathogen Receptor CD46
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
PPARδ Is a Type 1 IFN Target Gene and Inhibits Apoptosis in T Cells
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Diverse Herpesvirus MicroRNAs Target the Stress-Induced Immune Ligand MICB to Escape Recognition by Natural Killer Cells  Daphna Nachmani, Noam Stern-Ginossar,
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Suman Paul, Anuj K. Kashyap, Wei Jia, You-Wen He, Brian C. Schaefer 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 443-457 (October 2016) cGAS-Mediated Innate Immunity Spreads Intercellularly through HIV-1 Env-Induced Membrane Fusion Sites  Shuting Xu, Aurélie Ducroux, Aparna Ponnurangam, Gabrielle Vieyres, Sergej Franz, Mathias Müsken, Thomas Zillinger, Angelina Malassa, Ellen Ewald, Veit Hornung, Winfried Barchet, Susanne Häussler, Thomas Pietschmann, Christine Goffinet  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 443-457 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Coculture of Env-Expressing cGAS-Positive Donor Cells and Primary Human Macrophages Induces Type I IFN (A) Indicated CHO cells were cocultured with macrophages in the presence or absence of T-20. Induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression and secretion of bioactive IFN are shown. Error bars indicate SEM from five experiments. (B) Induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression in macrophages cocultured with indicated small interfering RNA (siRNA)-transfected CHO cells is shown. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of five. Significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. Δ < 1.5 IU/mL. Shown are results from one experiment representative out of two. (C) Shown are induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression and release of bioactive IFN in macrophages cocultured with indicated CHO or Jurkat cells. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of three. (D) Indicated Jurkat cells expressing cGAS-GFP variants were cocultured with macrophages. Shown is release of bioactive IFN. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of three. Lysates of indicated Jurkat cells were analyzed for expression of indicated proteins by immunoblotting. (E) Shown is release of bioactive IFN from macrophages transfected with small molecules extracted from indicated cell lines or pure cGAMP. Shown are results from one experiment representative out of two. (F) Macrophages were transfected with SVPDE-treated or control-treated cGAMP or CHO-derived small molecules. Shown is release of bioactive IFN. Shown are results from one experiment representative out of three. Error bars indicate, if not otherwise stated, SD obtained from one representative experiment out of two. See also Figures S1–S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Membrane Fusion-Induced Type I IFN Response Is STING-TBK-1 Dependent (A) Shown is the relative expression of cGAS and STING in macrophages after transfection of specific siRNAs. Error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments. Significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. (B) siRNA-transfected macrophages were cocultured with indicated CHO cells in the presence or absence of T-20. Induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression and release of bioactive IFN upon coculture are shown. Dotted line, assay background. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of two and three, respectively. (C) Shown is induction of human Ifit1 mRNA expression in indicated THP-1 cells upon coculture with indicated CHO cells. Expression of STING and cGAS is analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) Primary macrophages were pretreated with DMSO or BX795 for 48 hr, followed by coculture with indicated CHO cells. Induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression and release of bioactive IFN upon coculture are shown. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of three. Error bars indicate, if not otherwise stated, SD obtained from one representative experiment out of two. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mounting of Coculture-Induced Type I IFN Requires HIV-1 Env and CD4/Coreceptor-Mediated Membrane Fusion and Direct Cell-Cell Contacts (A) Indicated CHO cells were cocultured with primary macrophages in the presence or absence of T-20, C34, AMD3100, DMSO, or Maraviroc. Hybrids were assessed for induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. Error bars indicate SEM from three to five experiments. (B) Indicated CHO cells were cocultured with primary macrophages in the presence or absence of control IgG, anti-CD4, or anti-gp120 antibodies 2G12, 10-1074, and 3BNC117. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. Δ < 1.5 IU/mL. (C) CHO cells expressing indicated HIV-1 Env variants or empty vector were cocultured with primary macrophages in the presence or absence of T-20. Hybrids were assessed for induction of human Ifn-β mRNA expression. Supernatants were probed for release of bioactive IFN. Dotted line, assay background. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of two. (D) Jurkat cells expressing indicated HIV-1 Env variants were cocultured with primary macrophages in the presence or absence of T-20. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. Error bars indicate SEM from five experiments. (E) Primary macrophages and CHO cells were cocultured either directly or in transwells. Relative levels of human Ifn-β and Ifit1 mRNA expression are shown. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. Δ < 1.5 IU/mL. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of two. Error bars indicate, if not otherwise stated, SD obtained from one representative experiment out of two. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Induction of Type I IFN Involves T-20-Sensitive Microfusion Events between T Cells and Primary Macrophages (A) Indicated Jurkat cells and macrophages were stained with indicated dyes, respectively, prior to coculture in absence or presence of T-20 or Jasplakinolide (0.5 μM). Shown are representative dot plots from one out of six to ten experiments. Numbers in P2 indicate percentages of green events within the respective living gate P1. (B) Quantitative analysis of green dye acquisition by red CMTPX-positive macrophages after coculture with green CMFDA-positive T cells. Percentages obtained for association of Jurkat-Env T cells with macrophages in absence of treatment were set to 100%. Error bars indicate SEM of three to ten experiments. Significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. (C) cGAS-expressing Jurkat-Env cells were cocultured with macrophages in the presence of DMSO or Jasplakinolide (0.5 μM). Shown is the relative release of bioactive IFN upon coculture. Error bars indicate SEM from three experiments. (D) Time-lapse sequence of green CMFDA-labeled Jurkat-Env and red CMTPX-labeled macrophages in presence or absence of T-20. Imaging starts at 3 hr post-coculture initiation. Asterisks indicate sites of cell-cell interactions and intercellular transfer of cell tracker dye. Scale bar, 10 μm. See also Figure S5 and Movies S1 and S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Coculture-Induced Type I IFN Results in a Functional Antiviral State and Protects from HIV-1 Infection (A) Indicated CHO cells were cocultured with primary human macrophages in the presence or absence of T-20 or AMD3100. Hybrids were assessed for induction of indicated mRNA expression. Data were obtained from one experiment representative out of two to three. (B) Primary macrophages were pretreated with supernatant of indicated cocultures prior to infection with HIV-1Ba-L. Infection efficiency was monitored by FACS-based analysis of intracellular p24CA immunostaining. Numbers indicate the concentration of IFN (in IU/mL) measured in the coculture supernatant used for the inoculation of naive macrophages prior to infection. Macrophages of donor 3 were also treated with pure IFN-α2a (50 IU/mL). (C) Concentration of released bioactive IFN and the inhibition of HIV-1 infection are plotted against each other. For these values, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient R and the corresponding p value are shown. The open circle depicts the value obtained for pure IFN-α2a. (D) After coculture with indicated Jurkat cells, primary macrophages were challenged with HIV-1Ba-L. Infection efficiency was monitored by FACS-based analysis of intracellular p24CA immunostaining. T-20 was applied during coculture and omitted during HIV-1 challenge. Note: potentially remaining Jurkat cells were refractory to HIV-1 infection due to absent CD4 surface expression. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 HIV-1-Infected PBLs, but Not Cell-Free Virions, Convey a Type I IFN Response in Cocultured Autologous Macrophages (A) Relative cGAS mRNA and protein expression were analyzed in uninfected and HIV-1-infected PBLs. cGAS mRNA expression in THP-1 was set to 100%. Numbers indicate the percentage of p24CA-positive cells within the respective cultures. (B) Macrophages were infected with cell-free virus or cocultured with HIV-1-infected autologous PBLs in the presence or absence of T-20. HIV-1 infection of macrophages was monitored over time by FACS-based analysis of intracellular p24CA immunostaining. (C) Supernatants of the experiment shown in (B) and of the separate PBL monoculture were probed for bioactive IFN release using the HL116-based IFN luciferase reporter system. (D and E) Macrophages were infected with cell-free virus (D) or cocultured with HIV-1-infected or uninfected autologous PBLs (D and E) in the presence or absence of indicated drugs and antibodies. HIV-1 infection of macrophages was monitored over time by FACS-based analysis of intracellular p24CA immunostaining. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN release using the HL116-based IFN luciferase reporter system. Shown are the results of two different cocultures. (F) Same set-up like (B) and (C). Infected PBLs and macrophages were separated by transwells (TW) where indicated. See also Figures S2, S6, and S7. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Type I IFN Response that Is Induced in Primary Macrophages upon Interaction with HIV-1-Infected PBLs Coincides with cGAMP Presence in PBLs and Requires Functional STING in Target Macrophages (A) Macrophages were transfected with SVPDE-treated or control-treated small molecules extracted from sucrose-purified virions and corresponding producer PBLs. Supernatants of transfected macrophages were probed for bioactive IFN. Numbers indicate the percentage of p24CA-positive cells within the respective infected PBL cultures from which small molecules were extracted. Western blots show the amount of p24CA in the respective cell-free and cell-associated material used for small-molecule extraction. (B) cGAS and STING mRNA expression levels were reduced by transfection of macrophages with specific siRNAs. Shown is the relative expression of cGAS and STING obtained for (C) and (D). (C) Indicated macrophages were cocultured with autologous HIV-1-infected PBLs or challenged with cell-free virions. Supernatants were probed for bioactive IFN. (D) HIV-1 infection of macrophages was monitored by FACS-based analysis of intracellular HIV-1 p24CA immunostaining. Shown is one experiment representative out of three. Error bars indicate, if not otherwise stated, SD obtained from one representative experiment out of two. See also Figure S7. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 443-457DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.003) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions