PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BPAs Generator Model Validation Technique/Tool MVWG Denver, CO May 18-19, 2009 Steve Yang Bonneville Power Administration.
Advertisements

Reading a GE PSLF *.epc into PWS
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
January TSS J. Gronquist, S. Kincic
Siemens Power Technologies International
Development of Damping Algorithm Olof Samuelsson Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation
ERCOT VRT Study, Phase I ERCOT ROS Meeting December 10, 2009.
Programming Types of Testing.
Resource Data Needed For Dynamic Simulations
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
MotoHawk Training Model-Based Design of Embedded Systems.
Cape Scott Wind Farm model validation exercise Presentation to WECC REMTF November 18, 2014.
System Operator Conference Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS Facilitator Team.
Review of BPA Voltage Control Conference
 UK Power Networks. All rights reserved Demonstrating the benefits of energy storage on an 11 kV Distribution Network Matthieu Michel – Technology.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
GE Energy GE 2.x Zero Power Voltage Regulation Measurement Results Vincent Schellings.
Vestas.com Wind Power Plant Dynamic Reactive Power “Hybrid” Solutions to meet ERCOT Reactive Power Capability Requirements Presented at ERCOT ROS Meeting,
1 Software Reliability Analysis Tools Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana.
Unit 3 REACTIVE POWER AND VOLTAGE CONTROL.  BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF EXCITATION CNTRL  Excitation Current up to 10’000 amps  Input frequency range from.
November 16, 2012 Synchrophasor Meeting Dynamic Model Validation Project Jonathan Rose Engineer, Resource Integration Sidharth Rajagopalan Engineer, Dynamic.
Model Validation using PSS®E
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
DWG Procedural Manual: Wind Model Requirements DWG Request to ROS August 11, 2006.
Start of Sales MSI-XXXB Safety Relays Plugable screw or spring-cage terminal blocks.
Slaven Kincic MVWG March System Model Validation Task Force (SMVTF) System Events for System Model Validation o 21th January event:  Colstrip.
1 PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data Damien Sommer, P.E. Senior Transmission Planning Engineer.
Lecture 10 Transformers, Load & Generator Models, YBus Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
| Electric Power Group Presents Maximizing Use of Synchrophasor Technology for Everyday Tasks Welcome! The meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m. EDT / 11:00.
PowerWorld Case Validation
2017 WECC JSIS Report March 21, 2017.
GC0096 Electricity Storage Grid Code Requirements
ISO-NE Synchrophasor Related Projects
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Barrilla Junction Area Transmission Improvements Project
Siemens Wind Turbine Weak Grid Option Modeling in PSSE WECC library Hongtao Ma, Siemens Wind Power Joergen Nielsen, Siemens Wind Power Good morning,
PSCAD models.
Progress Report for the May 26th 17:31 Event
GIC Analysis using PSS®E
PMU Emulator for Power System Dynamics Simulators
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
GROUND-FAULT GROUND-CHECK MONITOR
Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
Load Model Data Tool Development Update
ECE 333 Green Electric Energy
Synchronising Controls Overview by Robert Breadon
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Electric Power Group Presents Maximizing Use of Synchrophasor Technology for Everyday Tasks Welcome! The meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m. EDT / 11:00.
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Accurate Fault Location Using Modeling and Simulation
Wind Farm Oscillation Detection and Mitigation
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
Composite Load Model with Distributed Generation (CMPLDWG)
2017 WECC JSIS Report March 21, 2017.
Siemens Power Technologies International
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
Hongming Zhang EMS Applications Manager, PEAK RC
Model Validation for Large Scale PV Plants
SRWG Meeting 15-2 Power Plant Validation Tools
6. USING THE TDR200 IN ANALOGUE MODE
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
System 57 Gas Control System
2018 CG MOD 33 updates CG Planning Meeting June 7, 2018
Multichannel Link Path Analysis
Presentation transcript:

PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data Damien Sommer, P.E. Senior Transmission Planning Engineer

ATC Footprint

DATC Transmission in WECC

PSSE Playback Feature Model will be available in PSS®E version 34.1 The model is supplied as part of PSS®E installation; therefore, use of this model will not require compilation and link. For version 33 users a .dll file can be downloaded from the Siemens PTI website

Time, voltage, frequency PSSE Playback Feature This model plays back a known set of voltage and frequency signals. The PLBVFU1 model acts as a generator model. In using this generator model, do not attach an AVR or governor model to the machine associated with the PLBVFU1 model. The played-in voltage and frequency signals must be described in a file as shown below, with each sample described in a separate record and the values in each line separated by spaces or commas: Time, voltage, frequency

PSSE Playback Feature The file containing the measurement has to be supplied in a file with an extension “.plb”. The file name (without the “.plb” extension) has to be less than or equal to 12 characters long for PSSE v 34 and less than or equal to 2 characters for PSSE v 33. This file has to exist in the working folder. If the “plb” file is not found, the PLBVFU1 model will keep the internal voltage and frequency fixed at the initial value (i.e., the playback feature will be ignored).

PSSE Playback Feature The voltage signal which is played back is the internal (Thevenin) voltage of the playback generator. The ZSORCE of the generator used to represent the PLVFBU1 model should be non-zero. The sampled voltage and frequency values may be smoothed via a first order block with time constants Tv (for voltage signal) and Tf (for frequency signal).

PMUs On ATC Transmission System 21 PMUs on high side of GSUs: 9 Coal 4 Combined Cycle Gas 2 Nuclear 4 Wind Farms 2 HVDC terminals

Python Script v1 – User Input Data baseCase = ‘Large_Coal_Unit_v33_20151008' plbfile = 'AA' dyrfile = 'Large_Coal_Unit_v33_20151008' csvoutfile = ‘Large_Coal_Unit.csv' testGenNum = 700001 testGenID = ‘1' equivFrom = 700000 Vnom = 345

Python Script v1 – Mini State Estimation Retrieve initial conditions recorded by PMU at POI Sets the initial conditions in the simplified case to those observed by the PMU at the POI Save case with initial conditions as temp.raw

Python Script v1 – Run and Output Run simulation using PMU data to define playback unit response Creates channel files for voltage, frequency, active power and reactive power at POI bus where PMU was recording Outputs a .csv file with data for each channel

Playback Simulation Process place PMU data .csv file, PSSE files, Python script in event folder Save .csv file as .plb file Run script (takes about 30 seconds)

Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Simplified Model Used in Playback Runs:

Demonstration

Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 1

Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 2

Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 3

Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 4

Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1 If monitored unit is not dispatched to PMAX governor PMAX value in .dyr file will likely have to be updated Values in MMWG case Unit MVA = 825 PMAX = 634 IEEEG1 governor model PMAX (pu on machine MVA rating) = 0.847 (~700/825) PGEN = ~500 MW during this event

Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0.847

Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0.606 (Pgen / MVA)

Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0.615

Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 3, Oscillations

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 First Pass

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 First Pass If using actual bus numbers and reusing the same python script check channel numbers PSSE orders model information by bus number ascending order If gen bus number is larger than POI bus number in one raw file but smaller than POI bus number in another raw file your exported channels will be different

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 Second Pass

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT2

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – ST

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – CT1

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – CT2

Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – ST

Example 4: ~300 MW Coal Unit Line Fault Event

Example 5: ~300 MW Coal Unit Trip of 850 MW Unit in Remote Location

Example 6: ~600 MW Nuclear Unit Trip of 1200 MW Unit in Remote Location

Example 7: ~600 MW Nuclear Unit 345-kV Line Fault

Harder Configurations to Validate: Gas Plant with PMU at Shared POI

Harder Configurations to Validate: Gas Plant with PMU at Shared POI PMU is on the POI bus and thus captures the output of both units simultaneously Version 2 Python Script required Investigate PI Historian data on the two units and set one plant P and Q output to initial output Fix the P and Q of the second unit with state estimation in in the python script

Harder Configurations to Validate: Wind Farm with Multiple Var Sources

Harder Configurations to Validate: Wind Farm with Multiple Var Sources PMU is on 138-kV Bus, there is a DSTAT model and switched shunt device on the 34.5-kV bus Cap Bank on unit bus is supposed to be manual set in the model based on wind unit output PI Historian data will have to be pulled to find starting points for wind unit, switched shunts and DSTAT model

Conclusion Still early in process of validating units but so far we haven’t found any events where the models matched reality very well This is a very important tool to help get us to better models More work is needed with GOs to improve models

Contact Information Damien Sommer, P.E. (262) 506-6949 dsommer@atcllc.com

Questions