TDP-43 Promotes Neurodegeneration by Impairing Chromatin Remodeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Alessio Vagnoni, Simon L. Bullock  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
MicroRNA Pathways Modulate Polyglutamine-Induced Neurodegeneration
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Jun-Ho Ha, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung, Chung-Mo Park 
Neuropeptide Y Regulates Sleep by Modulating Noradrenergic Signaling
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
CoREST Represses the Heat Shock Response Mediated by HSF1
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Esther B.E. Becker, Azad Bonni  Neuron 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e10 (February 2019)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
VRILLE Controls PDF Neuropeptide Accumulation and Arborization Rhythms in Small Ventrolateral Neurons to Drive Rhythmic Behavior in Drosophila  Kushan.
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Johnathan Labbadia, Richard I. Morimoto  Molecular Cell 
EVA1A/TMEM166 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis by Autophagy
Regulation of the Longevity Response to Temperature by Thermosensory Neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans  Seung-Jae Lee, Cynthia Kenyon  Current Biology 
Glial Cells Physiologically Modulate Clock Neurons and Circadian Behavior in a Calcium-Dependent Manner  Fanny S. Ng, Michelle M. Tangredi, F. Rob Jackson 
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 165, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Fig. 2 Spt4 modulation influences pathogenicity of GGGGCC repeats in C
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
by Felicia K. Ooi, and Veena Prahlad
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2018)
MRT, Functioning with NURF Complex, Regulates Lipid Droplet Size
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

TDP-43 Promotes Neurodegeneration by Impairing Chromatin Remodeling Amit Berson, Ashley Sartoris, Raffaella Nativio, Vivianna Van Deerlin, Jon B. Toledo, Sílvia Porta, Shichong Liu, Chia-Yu Chung, Benjamin A. Garcia, Virginia M.-Y. Lee, John Q. Trojanowski, F. Brad Johnson, Shelley L. Berger, Nancy M. Bonini  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages 3579-3590.e6 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 H3K4me3-Related Chromatin Factors Modify TDP-43 Toxicity (A) Heatmap of TDP-43 modifiers, ranked by their impact on the external eye of YH3-Gal4>UAS-TDP-43 flies. Asterisks denote modifiers with functions related to H3K4me3. (B) Chd1 RNAi enhances and lid RNAi suppresses TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration. Top: external eye images. Bottom: internal retinal structure. Arrows indicate retinal width. (C) Quantification of intact retinal tissue. Control, n = 5 animals; TDP-43, n = 14; lid, n = 6; Chd1, n = 8. F(3, 19) = 111.8, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. n.s., p > 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Tukey post hoc test. (D) Lifespan analysis of flies expressing TDP-43 and the indicated RNAi with the neuronal driver elav3A-Gal4. Lifespan was carried out at 29°C. TDP-43 expression shortens lifespan compared to flies expressing only control RNAi. Chd1 RNAi further shortens lifespan whereas lid RNAi prolongs lifespan. n = 200 flies per group. p < 0.001, log-rank test. (E) Knockdown of Chd1 or lid in the nervous system without TDP-43 expression has minimal effects on lifespan. Conditions were as in (D). (F) Lid and Set1 robustly modulate, but TDP-43 does not affect, brain H3K4me3 levels. F(3, 20) = 26.91, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. n.s., p > 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Tukey post hoc test. Graphs denote mean ± SEM. Full genotypes are detailed in Table S2. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Chd1 Depletion Promotes SG Formation (A) Chd1 knockdown efficiency in S2R+ cells. (B) Experimental flow. S2R+ cells were treated with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) for 4 days, stressed with 0.2 mM sodium arsenite (SA) for 2 hr, fixed, immunostained, and imaged. For automated image analysis, images were deconvolved and max projected, and automated detection of cells and SGs was performed with CellProfiler. IF, immunofluorescence. Arrowheads indicate cells with SGs and arrows indicate cells without visible SGs. (C) Chd1 knockdown facilitates SG formation upon arsenite stress but does not induce SGs on its own. Red; FMR1; blue, DAPI. Scale bars, 7.5 μm. Dashed boxes indicate magnified area shown in the panel below. (D) Chd1 knockdown enhances SG number per cell, SG size, and the percentage of cells that stain positive for SGs. Control dsRNA, n = 183 cells; Chd1 dsRNA, n = 193 cells; 14 images per condition. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney test. SG, stress granule. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Chd1 Modulates Stress Response Impairments Caused by TDP-43 (A) Stress sensitivity assay. Flies were heat shocked for 2 hr at 40°C and allowed to recover overnight (O/N), after which the percentage of dead animals was scored. (B) Chd1-deficient flies are heat stress sensitive. Heteroallelic Chd1 null flies (Chd1[4]/Chd1[5]), ubiquitous Chd1 knockdown flies, and controls were heat shocked at 40°C for 2 hr. Wild-type, n = 6; Chd1 null, n = 6; control RNAi, n = 5; Chd1 RNAi, n = 5 biological replicates of 20–30 flies per replicate. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. (C) Ubiquitous expression of TDP-43 in adult flies induces heat stress hypersensitivity. Chd1 RNAi increases and overexpression of Chd1 reduces mortality of TDP-43 animals following stress. Control, n = 13; TDP-43, n = 23; TDP-43 + Chd1 RNAi, n = 11; TDP-43 + Chd1-OE, n = 13 biological replicates. F(3, 56) = 229.1, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Tukey post hoc test. (D) Ubiquitous expression of wild-type or R406W Tau does not promote heat stress sensitivity. n = 3 biological replicates. n.s., p > 0.05, two-tailed t test. (E) Western immunoblot analysis of TDP-43 and Tau expression in whole flies. (F) Without additional stress, TDP-43 induces chaperone gene expression. qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA levels in whole flies. Following a 10-min heat stress at 35°C, TDP-43 impairs the heat shock response. mRNA levels are shown as fold induction from no stress, normalized to RpS20. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. n = 5 biological replicates. HS, heat shock; fc, fold change. (G) TDP-43 impairs and Chd1 rescues heat shock gene expression. Flies were heat shocked for 30 min at 35°C. Hsp mRNA levels are shown as fold induction from no stress, normalized to RpS20. Hsp40 F(2, 11) = 25.55, p < 0.001; Hsp68 F(2, 12) = 23.9, p < 0.001; Hsp70 loci F(2, 12) = 25, p < 0.00; Hsp83 F(2, 12) = 21.35, p < 0.001. ∗p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. (H) TDP-43 impairs heat shock gene induction in mammalian cells. TetON-GFP and TetON-GFP-TDP-43 cells were induced with doxycycline for 6 days, after which heat shock was applied for 1 hr at 46°C, and RNA was extracted for qRT-PCR analysis at 6 and 8 hr of recovery. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. n = 6 biological replicates. Expression data are relative to the control non-heat shock samples (defined as 1) to allow direct comparison between control and TDP-43 samples between the different stress conditions. All graphs denote mean ± SEM. Full genotypes are detailed in Table S2. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TDP-43 Impairs Nucleosomal Dynamics following Stress (A) MNase protection assay experimental design. (B) Control (non-heat shock) and heat shock (10 min at 35°C) flies were fixed and used for MNase protection. Results of real-time qPCR with primers spanning Hsp70 loci are shown as digested/undigested (total) chromatin. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of group F(5, 388) = 572.6, p < 0.001. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Tukey post hoc test. n = 6 biological replicates. Error bars show SEM. (C) Histone H3 ChIP experimental design. (D) Control (non-heat shock) and heat shock (10 min at 35°C) flies were fixed and used for total histone H3 ChIP. Results of real-time qPCR with primers spanning Hsp70 loci are shown as IP/input ratio. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of group F(5, 231) = 289.0, p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Tukey post hoc test. n = 6 biological replicates. Error bars show SEM. Chd1-OE, Chd1 overexpression. For (B) and (D), shaded areas show the range of nucleosome-occupied gene body without stress, for comparison with heat shock graphs. (E) Flies expressing tagged Chd1-HA, with or without TDP-43, were subjected to heat shock at 35°C or control temperatures for 10 min, fixed, and used for ChIP analysis. n = 6 biological replicates. Results are shown as IP/input ratio. Hsp70(−190) F(3, 20) = 13.35, p < 0.001; Hsp70(−140) F(3, 20) = 6.79, p < 0.01; Hsp70(−25) F(3, 20) = 45.18, p < 0.001; Hsp70(+247) F(3, 20) = 57.51, p < 0.001; Hsp70(+280) F(3, 20) = 63.97, p < 0.001; Hsp70(583) F(3, 20) = 53.1, p < 0.001; Hsp70(872) F(3, 20) = 14.89, p < 0.001; Hsp70(1275) F(3, 20) = 44.84, p < 0.001. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s., not significant. Error bars show SEM. x axis labels describe the location of the reverse primer relative to the transcription start site. Full genotypes are detailed in Table S2. See also Figures S4 and S5. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 TDP-43 Physically Interacts with Drosophila Chd1 and Human CHD2 (A) Human CHD1 and CHD2 are orthologs of Drosophila Chd1. (B) Adult Drosophila soluble and chromatin fractions were used for IP. IP samples were analyzed using western immunoblot with an anti-HA antibody to detect Chd1-HA. IgG IP serves as control. β-tubulin western immunoblot shows no significant interaction with TDP-43. (C and D) Human HEK293 cells were fractionated to soluble and chromatin fractions, and IP was performed with anti-TDP-43 antibodies (C), anti-CHD2 antibodies (D), or rabbit IgG as negative control. Note the selective interactions of CHD2 and TDP-43 primarily in the soluble fraction. Full genotypes are detailed in Table S2. See also Figure S5. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Abnormal TDP-43 Accumulations Promote Loss of CHD2 in Cultured Cells and Human FTD Cortex (A) CHD2 immunostaining in TetOn-GFP and TetOn-GFP-TDP-43 cells induced with doxycycline for 6 days. (B) Quantification of (A); ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test; n = 412 GFP cells, n = 332 GFP-TDP-43 cells. CHD2 intensity is decreased. (C) Reduced CHD2 intensity in cells bearing abnormal cytoplasmic TDP-43 in TetOn-GFP-TDP-43 cells. (D) Quantification of (C); ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test; n = 333 cells with nuclear TDP-43 localization, n = 54 cells with cytoplasmic TDP-43 localization. (E) Double immunolabeling of TDP-43 (green) and CHD2 (red) reveals reduced levels of CHD2 in FTD temporal cortex. (F) Quantification of CHD2 intensity in human post-mortem FTD temporal cortex. n = 6 controls, n = 8 FTD; ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. See also Table S4. (G) Quantification of CHD2 intensity in FTD temporal cortex cells with nuclear or cytoplasmic TDP-43. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. (H) Model of TDP-43-mediated impairments in chromatin remodeling. See text for details. Scale bars, 10 μm. Arrowheads in graphs show mean values. See also Figures S5 and S6 and Table S4. Current Biology 2017 27, 3579-3590.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions