DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 1 Beth Wilson Industry Co-Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Test Architect, Raytheon Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Advertisements

Planning Reports and Proposals
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 1 Chapter 25 Process Improvement.
CURRENT STATE OF ACQUISITION, TEST & EVALUATION ENTERPRISE NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENTATION TO INCOSE ENCHANTMENT CHAPTER Charles Pete Adolph.
Systems Security Engineering An Updated Paradigm INCOSE Enchantment Chapter November 8, 2006 John W. Wirsbinski.
RISK MANAGEMENT and RM Tools 2 May 2007 INCOSE – Newport News, VA Chapter.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Lisa Brown and Charles Thomas LAWNET 2002 Taking the Mystery Out of Project Management.
HIPAA Security Presentation to The American Hospital Association Dianne Faup Office of HIPAA Standards November 5, 2003.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE ARMAMENTO Y MATERIAL MINISDEF Industrial Policy Focused to SMEs Conference Strengthening European Small and Medium sized Enterprises.
Project design, preparation and approval Basel Convention Resource Mobilization Workshop Nairobi, 3 – 7 December 2006 Andreas Arlt Secretariat of the Basel.
1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 Consultant Contract Program Collaboration Project ACEC-Mn/DOT Annual Conference March 2, 2010.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Modern Systems Analyst and as a Project Manager
Presentation for ASMC PDI 2010 June 4, 2010 Thomas Hessel Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Requirements and Program.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
1 Welcome to ASTM International Association of State Correctional Administrators Association of State Correctional Administrators.
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Effective Test Planning: Scope, Estimates, and Schedule Presented By: Shaun Bradshaw
Effective Contract Management Planning
ESOH Committee Task Plan
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
1 Elevators, Airbags & FM Radio Communication Planning Innovation and Next Practice Division (DEECD) Design Teams Professional Development Workshop February.
Project Management CHAPTER SIXTEEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
The Office Procedures and Technology
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Integrating Developmental and Operational Testing
1 Functional Strategy – IS & IT Geoff Leese November 2006, revised July 2007, September 2008, August 2009.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 1 Process Improvement 1.
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
NDIA SoS SE Committee Topics of Interest May 25, 2009.
1 K. C. Lo / L. M. Chow Power Systems Business Group CLP Power Knowledge Management in CLP Power Oct 2004.
1 Development of Electronic Reporting Tools for IPPC Directive and WI Directive Workshop – Objective and next steps Tuesday 3 rd March 2009 Meeting room.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
1 Safety Assurance JPDO Perspective Maureen Keegan 11 October, 2012.
Presented to: NDIA PMSC By: Keith Kratzert Date: January 29, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Improving Program Performance at FAA.
Organization, Implementation, and Control
Chapter 14: Network Design and Facility Location.
1 Accountability and Management of Military Equipment January 26, 2007 Webcast Interview With Mr. Richard K. Sylvester Deputy Director, Acquisition Resources.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 12, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Status and Plans February 2014 Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec,
A Navy Business Initiative Defense Daily OA Summit 12 November 2013 Nickolas H. Guertin, PE Director for Transformation DASN RDT&E
DoD Software Issues and Gap Identification Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance OUSD(AT&L) April 18, 2007.
Software and System Engineering Integration Sponsor Overview Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance Office of the Under.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
NDIA SE Division – Annual Planning Meeting December 11-12, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Status and Plans December 2013 Beth Wilson,
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 13, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec, Northrop Grumman Industry.
DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems.
Geospatial LoB: Lifecycle WG Update November 3, 2009.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of: 02 Mar 051 Partnering with Industry on System Safety & MIL-STD-882D.
Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009.
ICOTE Meeting October, Chief Developmental Tester Project Status for ICOTE October 2014 Brendan Rhatigan – Lockheed Martin.
Improving Mission Effectiveness By Exploiting the Command’s Implementation Of the DoD Enterprise Services Management Framework - DESMF in the [name the.
Presentation transcript:

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 1 Beth Wilson Industry Co-Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Test Architect, Raytheon Company Darlene Mosser-Kerner Government Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems & Software Engineering Prepare by the NDIA SE Divisions DT&E Committee March 2009 Tom Wissink Industry Co-Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Lockheed Martin Fellow, Lockheed Martin DT&E Committee & Integrated Testing Walking the Line with Title 10

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 2 DT&E Committee Key Objectives Committee with the System Engineering (SE) Support Revitalization of SE Improve understanding of the relationship between the SE process and DT&E activities: –Promote effective DT&E activities as fundamental to the SE process Improve understanding and use of robust and efficient DT&E approaches –Recommend DoD policy and guidance changes to improve DT&E and remove any barriers to effective DT&E –Improve understanding and use of modeling and simulation in DT&E –Identify DT&E activities for Capabilities Based (System of Systems) Acquisition –Identify barriers to effective and efficient DT&E

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 3 DT&E Committee Background Formed in August 2006 to support SE process: –Help mature a systems requirements & design –Verify technical specifications have been met –Evaluates a systems readiness for OT&E –Provides assistance to program managers during system development lifecycle

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 4 DT&E Committee Deliverables 2007 Focus Teams defined issues: –Earlier Contractor and Government DT&E Involvement –Integrated DT/OT & DT Operational Relevance –Suitability 2008 White Paper Published with 2007 Results –Recommendations in all three areas 2009 Integrated DT/OT: Article & Tutorial published 2009 SW T&E Summit/Workshop –December - Draft White Paper with recommendations T&E Track in SE Division Conference

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 5 Why Integrated Testing? Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Defense AT&L: January-February 2008

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 6 Why Integrated Testing? Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Defense AT&L: January-February 2008 Robust testing minimizes surprises when the product is sent to the war fighter OT&E should be a process of confirmation and not one of discovery The goal is early identification of technical, operational, and system deficiencies Need early identification of problems

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 7 Why Integrated Testing? Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology DSB Task Force on DT&E May 2008 Report

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 8 Why Integrated Testing? Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology DSB Task Force on DT&E May 2008 Report Rigorous T&E … sacrificed to meet schedule demands Cost is reduced by sharing of resources, elimination of duplicative testing Schedule compression is achieved by combined vs. sequential testing and the sharing of high-demand testing assets Negative impact on ability to successfully execute complex programs: Massive workforce reductions in acquisition and test personnel Need integrated testing to meet cost/schedule demands

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 9 Integrated Test Definitions: DoD 9 OSD McQueary/Finley Memo 25 Apr 2008 DAG Chapter 9 OSD McQueary/Young Memo 22 Dec 2007

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Integrated Test Definitions: DoD OSD McQueary/Finley Memo 25 Apr 2008 DAG Chapter 9 OSD McQueary/Young Memo 22 Dec 2007 Developmental and operational test activities shall be integrated and seamless Conduct a single combined test program that produces credible qualitative and quantitative information that can be used to address developmental and operational issues Collaborative planning and collaborative execution

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Integrated Test Definitions: Services Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Army Air Force

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Integrated Test Definitions: Services Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Army Air Force Single integrated test strategy Generates data to address developmental and operational issues simultaneously under operational conditions CT, DT, and OT entities work to blend or integrate the T&E requirements Harmonization of all types of tests Integrated as early as possible into an efficient continuum Development of test plans that are integrated

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title What Does Title 10 Say? conduct of OT&E establishing criteria for OT&E OT&E evaluation Contractor cannot be involved in: OT&E conduct Establishing OT&E criteria OT&E evaluation

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Title 10 Allows Support to OT&E Title 10: Contractor cannot be involved in: OT&E conduct Establishing OT&E criteria OT&E evaluation Air Force Army DAG Chapter 9 Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Title 10 Allows Support to OT&E Title 10: Contractor cannot be involved in: OT&E conduct Establishing OT&E criteria OT&E evaluation Air Force Army DAG Chapter 9 Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Contractor CAN provide: Technical understanding of test incidents Logistic support and training Support to test failure analysis Unique software and instrumentation support Insert OT&E relevance into their own test plans/procedures

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Title 10 Allows Sharing of Data NDIA T&E Conference March T&E Management Guide Navy OT&E Framework Integrated Test Methodology Air Force Army OSD McQueary/Young Memo 22 Dec 2007

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title T&E Strategies Test and Evaluation Strategy: Knowledge to manage risks Empirical data to validate models and simulations Evaluate technical performance Evaluate system maturity Determine operational Effectiveness Suitability Survivability

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Implementation Framework Integrate the People –Integrated Test Teams –Coordination and cooperation for integrated strategy –Early OT&E influence on test design and scenarios Integrate the Planning –Early and collaborative planning for efficient use of test assets –Improve test efficiency and streamline test schedule –Reduce duplication and voids Integrate the Data –Maximize data available and usability for OT&E –Common data formats to facilitate sharing –Incorporate operational realism in DT&E

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Attributes of Integrated Testing If the DT&E and OT&E personnel recognize each other in the airport, you might be doing integrated testing If you find the contractor data augmenting the OT&E data, you might be doing integrated testing If the OT&E personnel influences DT&E scenarios, you might be doing integrated testing If the DT&E system is operated by end users, you might be doing integrated testing If the CT, DT, and OT teams are sharing data in a common format, you might be doing integrated testing If the OT&E confirms DT&E results, you might be doing integrated testing

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title ITEA Journal Article September 2009 Article Outline Definitions of Integrated Testing Barriers to Integrated Testing Implementation Framework for Effective Integrated Testing: Collaborative Planning Collaborative Execution Shared Data Summary

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Path Forward Continuing Effort Output Products Continuing Effort Theme –Policy is okay as is (no additional changes recommended) –Some teams are already doing this well –Continue to work cultural barriers with information –Communicate(T&E Conference, ATS Conference, SE Conference, ICPM) Integrated Testing Tutorial –Presented at NDIA Systems Engineering Conference –Basis for potential Defense Acquisition University online learning module Potential Topic for ICOTE (Industry Consortium on OT&E) Promote Framework on Integrated Testing –Paper presented at NDIA Test & Evaluation Conference (Mar 2009) Walking the Line with Title 10 –Abstract planned for NDIA Test & Evaluation Conference (2010)

DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title Summary Integrated Testing is Needed –Facilitate early identification and correction of system deficiencies –Make OT&E a process of confirmation instead of discovery –Minimize surprises when the product is sent to the war fighter –Reduce cost and schedule with shared resources and reduced duplication Title 10 –Prohibits contractor involvement in OT&E conduct, criteria establishment, or evaluation –Allows contractor to provide technical understanding and support –Allows for collaborative planning and execution of an integrated test program to provide shared data to support independent analysis Integrated Test Implementation Framework Involves Integrating –People: Integrated test teams to introduce operational realism earlier –Planning: Early and collaborative efforts to streamline test program –Data: Sharing of data to address developmental and operational issues