Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
The structure of OmpF porin in a tetragonal crystal form
Crystal Structure of Manganese Catalase from Lactobacillus plantarum
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
The crystal structure of Cys-tRNACys–EF-Tu–GDPNP reveals general and specific features in the ternary complex and in tRNA  Poul Nissen, Søren Thirup,
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages (October 1996)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 1147-1158 (November 1995) The structure of Pyrococcus furiosus glutamate dehydrogenase reveals a key role for ion-pair networks in maintaining enzyme stability at extreme temperatures  KSP Yip, TJ Stillman, KL Britton, PJ Artymiuk, PJ Baker, SE Sedelnikova, PC Engel, A Pasquo, R Chiaraluce, V Consalvi, R Scandurra, DW Rice  Structure  Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 1147-1158 (November 1995) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9

Figure 1 Alignment of the sequences for Clostridium symbiosum (Cs) and Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf) GluDH based on the superposition of the respective Cα coordinates of each domain. Equivalent residues whose relative positions differ by greater than 2 å are indicated by the use of lower-case letters. The secondary structural elements of the three-dimensional structure of the two GluDHs are shown with helices represented as cylinders and strands shown as arrows. The residue numbers for the individual sequences are given at the beginning and end of each line. Positions of deletions are indicated by –. Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 2 Stereo diagrams of a single subunit of Pf GluDH. The organization of the subunit into two domains, separated by a deep cleft, can be seen. In this view, the threefold axis of the GluDH hexamer runs vertically and domain I, responsible for the major intersubunit interactions lies uppermost with domain II, which contains the nucleotide-binding site, in the lower portion of the figure (a) Schematic representation with strands (a–m) and helices (1–14) marked. (b) Cα trace with every tenth residue indicated by a black dot. (Figure prepared using MOLSCRIPT [56].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 2 Stereo diagrams of a single subunit of Pf GluDH. The organization of the subunit into two domains, separated by a deep cleft, can be seen. In this view, the threefold axis of the GluDH hexamer runs vertically and domain I, responsible for the major intersubunit interactions lies uppermost with domain II, which contains the nucleotide-binding site, in the lower portion of the figure (a) Schematic representation with strands (a–m) and helices (1–14) marked. (b) Cα trace with every tenth residue indicated by a black dot. (Figure prepared using MOLSCRIPT [56].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 3 Superpositions of Cs (blue) and Pf (green) GluDHs. (a) The N-terminal regions (α1–α5 in Cs, α1–α2 in Pf) are shown. Helices α2 (Cs) and α1 (Pf) superimpose well as do helices α5 (Cs) and α2 (Pf). However, α1 (Cs) is completely absent in Pf and the loop α1–α2 in Pf is much shorter, replacing α3 and α4 in Cs. (b) Superposition of the region βh–βj which, in both GluDHs, forms the recognition site for the adenine ribose moiety. (Figure prepared using MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 3 Superpositions of Cs (blue) and Pf (green) GluDHs. (a) The N-terminal regions (α1–α5 in Cs, α1–α2 in Pf) are shown. Helices α2 (Cs) and α1 (Pf) superimpose well as do helices α5 (Cs) and α2 (Pf). However, α1 (Cs) is completely absent in Pf and the loop α1–α2 in Pf is much shorter, replacing α3 and α4 in Cs. (b) Superposition of the region βh–βj which, in both GluDHs, forms the recognition site for the adenine ribose moiety. (Figure prepared using MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 4 A ‘glowing coals’ representation to illustrate the B factors of the main-chain Cα atoms of (a) Pf GluDH and (b) Cs GluDH. The colours from black to white through red and yellow indicate increasing temperature factors. The colour key is black (0–5 å2), indigo (5–15 å2), dark red (15–25 å2), orange (25–35 å2), yellow (35–45 å2), pale yellow (45–55 å2) and white (above 55 å2). Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 4 A ‘glowing coals’ representation to illustrate the B factors of the main-chain Cα atoms of (a) Pf GluDH and (b) Cs GluDH. The colours from black to white through red and yellow indicate increasing temperature factors. The colour key is black (0–5 å2), indigo (5–15 å2), dark red (15–25 å2), orange (25–35 å2), yellow (35–45 å2), pale yellow (45–55 å2) and white (above 55 å2). Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 5 The cluster of isoleucine residues in the core of domain I in the Pf GluDH structure. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 6 Ion-pair distribution (a) Stereoview of a monomer of Pf GluDH. (b) Stereoview of a monomer of Cs GluDH. The polypeptide backbone of each enzyme is represented in white. The side chains of amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pairs in each of the respective structures are highlighted in blue (lysine arginine and histidine) and red (aspartate and glutamate). The viewing direction is approximately the same as in Figure 2. (c) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Pf GluDH. (d) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Cs GluDH. Both trimers are viewed down the three-fold axis and show the face of the trimer buried on hexamer formation. The basic and acidic side chains involved in the formation of ion-pairs are coloured as in (a). The higher proportion of ion-pairs in the Pf GluDH structure is clear. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 6 Ion-pair distribution (a) Stereoview of a monomer of Pf GluDH. (b) Stereoview of a monomer of Cs GluDH. The polypeptide backbone of each enzyme is represented in white. The side chains of amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pairs in each of the respective structures are highlighted in blue (lysine arginine and histidine) and red (aspartate and glutamate). The viewing direction is approximately the same as in Figure 2. (c) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Pf GluDH. (d) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Cs GluDH. Both trimers are viewed down the three-fold axis and show the face of the trimer buried on hexamer formation. The basic and acidic side chains involved in the formation of ion-pairs are coloured as in (a). The higher proportion of ion-pairs in the Pf GluDH structure is clear. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 6 Ion-pair distribution (a) Stereoview of a monomer of Pf GluDH. (b) Stereoview of a monomer of Cs GluDH. The polypeptide backbone of each enzyme is represented in white. The side chains of amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pairs in each of the respective structures are highlighted in blue (lysine arginine and histidine) and red (aspartate and glutamate). The viewing direction is approximately the same as in Figure 2. (c) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Pf GluDH. (d) Space-filling representation of the trimer of Cs GluDH. Both trimers are viewed down the three-fold axis and show the face of the trimer buried on hexamer formation. The basic and acidic side chains involved in the formation of ion-pairs are coloured as in (a). The higher proportion of ion-pairs in the Pf GluDH structure is clear. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 7 Ion-pair formation at the interface between the two domains of the Pf GluDH subunit. The part of the polypeptide backbone belonging to domain I is shown in yellow whilst that of domain II is in green. The side chains of amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pairs in the structure are highlighted in blue (lysine, arginine and histidine) and red (aspartate and glutamate). Potential hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines. (a) The ion-pair interactions centred on a cluster of five residues at the domain interface and involving a triple ion-pair of Arg396 with three acidic residues. (b) A second cluster of five residues which form ion-pairs linking the two domains. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 7 Ion-pair formation at the interface between the two domains of the Pf GluDH subunit. The part of the polypeptide backbone belonging to domain I is shown in yellow whilst that of domain II is in green. The side chains of amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pairs in the structure are highlighted in blue (lysine, arginine and histidine) and red (aspartate and glutamate). Potential hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines. (a) The ion-pair interactions centred on a cluster of five residues at the domain interface and involving a triple ion-pair of Arg396 with three acidic residues. (b) A second cluster of five residues which form ion-pairs linking the two domains. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 8 The extensive ion-pair network at one of the twofold axes relating dimers of the Pf hexamer. (a) Stereoview of the region. The Cα backbone for each independent subunit involved is shown in a different colour for clarity (subunits A and B are green and white respectively, with their symmetry-related subunits in yellow and magenta). Residues highlighted in the picture correspond to those which participate in ion-pair interactions and are coloured red (aspartate and glutamate) and blue (arginine, lysine and histidine). Central to the diagram is the extensive network of 18 ion-pairs which stabilizes the intersubunit interface. (b) Close-up view depicting the detailed interactions at the centre of the 18-residue ion-pair cluster, centred on Arg124, Arg128 and Glu158. Residues labelled # are related by the twofold axis. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 8 The extensive ion-pair network at one of the twofold axes relating dimers of the Pf hexamer. (a) Stereoview of the region. The Cα backbone for each independent subunit involved is shown in a different colour for clarity (subunits A and B are green and white respectively, with their symmetry-related subunits in yellow and magenta). Residues highlighted in the picture correspond to those which participate in ion-pair interactions and are coloured red (aspartate and glutamate) and blue (arginine, lysine and histidine). Central to the diagram is the extensive network of 18 ion-pairs which stabilizes the intersubunit interface. (b) Close-up view depicting the detailed interactions at the centre of the 18-residue ion-pair cluster, centred on Arg124, Arg128 and Glu158. Residues labelled # are related by the twofold axis. (Drawn with MIDASPLUS [57,58].) Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 9 A schematic representation of the ion-pair network shown in Figure 8. The twofold axis relating dimers is indicated by the dyad symbol. Two of the subunits of each trimer are labelled A and B with their respective twofold symmetry-related partners labelled A# and B#. The individual amino acid residues which are involved in ion-pair interactions, are indicated using the three-letter amino acid code followed by their sequence number. Dotted lines connect ion-pair partners. Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)

Figure 10 A representative portion of the final |2Fo–Fc| exp(iαc) map calculated using the refined model at 2.2 å. Structure 1995 3, 1147-1158DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9)