J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
WLTP drive trace normalization
Applicability of Driving Index
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP Number of Tests Different Options And Their Consequences IWG in Stockholm, Christoph Lueginger, BMW WLTP-10-26e.
Status Report of the WLTP coasting Task Force Author: Thomas Vogel (chairman) WLTP IG, 9 th meeting, Geneva, Jan 2015 WLTP-09-15e.
Comment from Japan for Normalization item “Deviation from target speed” WLTP-09-24e.
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
2015/9/29 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Asian Round Robin Test ~ Interim report ~ 12th WLTP-IWG 29 Sep – 1 Oct 2015 prepared by Japan WLTP-12-32e.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Starting note on gearshift issues
2016/4/25 Japan Automobile Research Institute 11 Asian Round Robin Test WLTP-IWG April 2016 Prepared by JAPAN WLTP-14-11e.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
Mobile Air-conditioning (MAC):
WLTP-14-15e Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-14-15e) 14th WLTP IWG 26 April 2016.
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Drive Trace Indices in WLTP
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Status report on the DTI TF Takahiro HANIU (JASIC/JARI)
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act June 14th, 2017
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Driving Indices and correction of test cycle flexibilities
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-189
Correlation Improvements
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Alessandro Marotta Stefanos Tsiakmakis
Meeting of the Steering Group for Simulation Issues from the last SGS meeting in LAT model development Munich, 25 July 2014 Biagio Ciuffo Georgios.
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
WLTP Correlation engine modeling
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act July 18th, 2017
1. Summary # items RESULTS status remarks EV_1 HEV system power
Vehicle classification for Electrified vehicle
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Stefanos Tsiakmakis Alessandro Marotta
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Specifications for 4WD Chassis Dynamometer in WLTP
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Palais des Nations, Geneva
OIL# 52: End of PEV range criteria
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Presentation transcript:

J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017 Update on correction of test cycle flexibilities J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017

Background JRC applied speed + distance CO2 corrections proposed by TUG on a number of vehicles tested in JRC labs and for a limited number of vehicles on tests done in some OEM and TSs labs; In most cases repeatability and reproducibility of results increased after corrections; In most cases deviations from the target power and distance were very small and corrections only slightly effected the final CO2 result;

Background Last time we showed you CO2 results for 5 vehicles from CO2MPAS simulations for 4 theoretical speed profiles (normal, maximum, minimum, and optimized) in order to evaluate possible effect on CO2 if no corrections were done; Without corrections and using the optimized speed profile savings in CO2 for these tested 5 vehicles can go up to 4.3 g/km; However, it also became obvious that method proposed for corrections shall be further tested with “real” tests done with optimized and rough speed profiles.

Work in progress JRC received data from VW testing of 1 vehicle under normal, high/rough and low/smooth WLTP conditions; We have also received data from JARI (Japan Research Institute) for 9 vehicles tested under normal, smooth, rough/extreme rough WLTP conditions; Speed + distance corrections for these tests were done, but also calculation of driving indexes (in particular RMSSE and IWR) that are already part of WLTP procedure; Japan proposal from the last WLTP IWG meeting (18th) is to set criteria for these DIs as following: RMSSE (Root Mean Squared Speed Error) < +0.8 IWR (Inertial Work Rated) -2.0 ~ +4.0

VW vehicle MT-GASOLINE VW VEHICLE MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 121.3 121.0 5.5 23.2925 0.756 1.56% TEST2-HIGH 1 127.2 120.3 6.0 23.5494 1.668 14.82% TEST3-HIGH 2 126.8 120.0 23.5701 1.726 9.92% TEST4-LOW1 113.5 118.1 5.1 23.2101 1.596 -11.13% TEST5-LOW2 114.9 118.6 5.2 23.2664 1.444 -7.94%

JARI vehicle A CVT-GASOLINE-1.4L JARI VEHICLE A MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST 1-NORMAL 132.7 133.1 5.40 23.2774 0.489 0.27% TEST 2-SMOOTH 128.2 129.9 5.39 23.4010 1.027 -7.12% TEST 3-EXTREMELY ROUGH 182.3 179.3 5.38 23.1998 0.977 43.03%

JARI vehicle A Extreme rough

SPEED+DISTANCE CORRECTION JARI vehicle B CVT,GASOLINE, 0.7L JARI - VEHICLE B MEASURED SPEED+DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 117.5 117.6 5.01 23.2131 0.715 1.12% TEST 2-SMOOTH 114.4 115.9 4.98 23.3636 1.180 -6.85% TEST 3-EXTREMELY ROUGH 136.9 135.0 4.96 23.1574 1.166 23.50%

JARI vehicle C MT, GASOLINE, 2.0L JARI - VEHICLE C MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 179.5 179.4 6.61 23.2702 0.674 1.91% TEST 2-SMOOTH 177.6 178.1 23.3631 1.135 -7.09% TEST 3-EXTREMELY ROUGH 189.6 185.6 6.76 23.1874 1.011 41.47%

JARI vehicle D CVT,GASOLINE, 1.2L JARI - VEHICLE D MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 117.2 117.1 5.00 23.2705 0.470 0.46% TEST 2-SMOOTH 112.0 114.8 4.84 23.2674 1.214 -9.26%

SPEED+DISTANCE CORRECTION JARI vehicle E AT, GASOLINE, 0.7L JARI - VEHICLE E MEASURED SPEED+DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 174.3 180.5 6.71 22.7213 3.757 -10.64% TEST 2-SMOOTH 173.1 181.3 6.70 22.8683 4.051 -16.26% TEST 3-ROUGH 175.1 181.7 6.65 22.7036 3.913 -8.17% Vehicle E could not follow the EH phase, it was in WOT operation. It is visible bellow in table that IWR was extremely high for EH phase. For this vehicle downscaling and capping shall be performed and in that case results will have much more sense. IWR (%) L M H EH Total TEST1-NORMAL 0.842% 0.536% 1.427% -37.697% -10.642% TEST 2-SMOOTH -6.103% -6.301% -6.360% -39.594% -16.259% TEST 3-ROUGH 5.085% 4.664% 4.536% -38.291% -8.167%

JARI vehicle F CVT, GASOLINE, 0.6L JARI - VEHICLE F MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 129.5 6.13 23.2909 0.498 0.17% TEST 2-SMOOTH 126.8 128.2 6.12 23.4615 1.272 -4.43% TEST 3-ROUGH 133.4 133.6 6.03 23.2344 0.896 2.98% Vehicle F is a low-powered vehicle (Japanese Kei car) and there was not possible to operate aggressive driving —› low IWR Also power enrichment was often happening during rough driving —› increase in CO2 that could not be corrected with formulas proposed.

JARI vehicle G CVT, GASOLINE, 1.5L JARI - VEHICLE G MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 125.5 125.6 5.66 23.2690 0.377 0.65% TEST 2-SMOOTH 121.7 123.0 5.64 23.4861 1.230 -5.69% TEST 3-ROUGH 129.0 5.57 23.2632 0.781 2.59%

JARI vehicle H MT, GASOLINE, 2.0L JARI - VEHICLE H MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 307.8 306.7 12.22 23.2977 0.558 2.26% TEST 2-SMOOTH 301.2 301.8 12.32 23.5345 1.226 -2.78% TEST 3-ROUGH 309.4 308.0 12.18 23.2386 0.874 4.73%

JARI vehicle I MT, DIESEL , 3.0L JARI - VEHICLE I MEASURED SPEED+ DISTANCE CORRECTION POWER (KW) DISTANCE (KM) DRIVING INDEXES RMSSE (km/h) IWR (%) TEST1-NORMAL 283.4 282.4 12.94 23.2643 0.437 0.31% TEST 2-SMOOTH 280.4 282.9 12.86 23.4648 1.195 -4.75% TEST 3-ROUGH 286.5 284.9 12.92 23.2618 0.787 2.61%

Conclusions It is evident that in most cases DIs detected the extreme (smooth and rough) tests; When corrections were performed for these tests, results improved, but for many vehicles were far from “normal” test results, especially in the cases of “rough” driving; Possible approach would be to use DIs to eliminate extreme tests and correction to apply only on tests where DIs were within the agreed threshold limits; Threshold values can be further discussed within the group and JRC will further evaluate the limits.