Combined IFTA / IRP Reviews and E-Reviews Update Presented by: Debora K. Meise, Program Director IFTA, Inc. Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Combined IFTA / IRP Reviews What Worked - What Didn’t What worked: Audit What didn’t: Administrative
Organizations Issues 4 Year v. 5 Year Review Cycle Regional Rotation v. Implementation Year Rotation
Can I still request a Combined Review? Both Boards have agreed that if a Jurisdiction wants a Combined Review the Organizations will do their best to try to accommodate the jurisdiction.
E-Reviews First Came Massachusetts Four Test Jurisdictions Missouri Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota
E-Reviews Following the 2010 ABM Iowa Oklahoma Illinois Wisconsin
E-Reviews Highlights Lowlights Future
Highlights Less Jurisdiction staff resources Ease of loading documents to the CH Upload data anytime No disruption to jurisdiction operations No travel – volunteers stay home Ease of reviewing documentation Cost Savings
Lowlights Conference Call issues Communication Upload of data – different formats/sizes Large audit files harder to upload/review Miss the Face-to-Face
Future Webinar Training for Reviewers Web Conferencing Video Conferencing
Comments… Questions? Suggestions!