PRO Plan Update: Level of Service Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Avenida La Pata/Avenida Vista Hermosa Park and Development Study Land Use Charette MAY 15, 2004.
Advertisements

Red Fields to Green Fields National Research Project – City of Denver Team Members Scott Robson- Deputy Director, Denver Parks & Recreation Tim Wohlgenant-
Aspen Falls Park Development Land Acquisition for Parks One Minute to Start.
City Council Presentation July 1, 2014 Parks & Recreation Master Plan.
Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
January 7, 2015 Preliminary Report: State Recreation and Habitat Lands Legislature Would Benefit From Additional Information About Detailed Outcomes And.
A New Aquatic Facility for McCormick Park Recreation and wellness for all. An important public investment.
Parks & Recreation Department
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Article 49 - Davis Field Park & Recreation Commission Town Meeting May
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Citizens Capital Budget Advisory Committee Presentation November 1,
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Beyond the Environment: Socio- Economic Sustainability & Meaningful Community Input in Land Use Decisions Sarah Muller March 7 th, 2008.
PRESENTATION: James City County Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
City of New Orleans Financial Overview. City of New Orleans Budget Overview Revenue Expenditure (in millions) Operating Budget $620.
FY Budget Worksession Parks & Recreation Division July 13, 2015.
Philadelphia’s Red Fields to Green Fields.
Long Term Sustainable Funding Committee Colorado Springs, Colorado September 16, 2008 Public Financial Management Two Logan Square, Suite th & Arch.
State Parks and Recreation Areas Ron Olson, Chief Parks and Recreation Division.
PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION July 21, 2010 FY Budget Worksession.
County Facilities Impact Fee Exemption Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7,
Copyright © 2014 Nelson Education Ltd. 11–1 PowerPoint Presentations for Finance for Non-Financial Managers: Seventh Edition Prepared by Pierre Bergeron.
South Greenville Recreation Center and Park Master Plan.
St. Edward Athletic Field Renovation Project Open House February 23, 2016.
Public Hearing – FY 2017 – 2021 Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget April 25, 2016.
Park Land Dedication Guidelines. Purpose of the Presentation Outline the proposed process to provide guidance to the Park Board & City Council on the.
CHAPEL HILL PARKS & RECREATION Comprehensive Parks Plan Chapel Hill Greenways Master Plan.
Title slide. Planning Process Where are we now? Where do we want to be? How do we get there? Action plan Park and Facility Inventory and Analysis Recommendations,
Park Planning for the City of San Diego Robin Shifflet April 22, 2016 City of San Diego Planning Department.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (Annual Update) September 25, 2007.
Residential Impact Fee - Nexus Study Update City of Pasadena Conclusions & Findings Prepared by Brion & Associates In association with Nilsson Consulting.
City of Parkland Vacant Land Plan. Outline  Community Input  Demographics Analysis  Levels of Service  Equity Mapping  Recommendations.
How Grand Should Limon’s Plan Be?
City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.
Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Grant Presentation
Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Prospect MAX.
2017 Zoning Update New Sewickley Township.
Review of Park Facility Uses and Regulations
Comprehensive plan Discussion
Mid-Year Financial Review Fiscal Year
Why this project should NOT be built in Golden Gate Park And
Wildcat/Middle Fields Project Update June 12, 2014
Fiscal Year 2017 Final Budget Workshop
PHED 1 Opportunities for Participation Concepts of Physical Activity
2017 Budgets & Core Service Review
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Concept Plan for Proposed Park Near Hopewell School
MUNICIPAL BUDGETED PROPERTY TAX COMPARISON The following is a yearly property tax comparison from FY to FY :
PRO Plan Update Chapter 1
Municipality of Central Elgin
Capital Improvement Program
Update on Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan
PRO PLAN UPDATE– Chapter 3, Goals & Objectives
2012 REPORT ON PARKS & RECREATION OPERATIONS
Capital Budgeting.
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
CIP Amendment – Property Acquisition
PRO Plan Update: Capital Improvement Plan List
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
Discussion of Parks & Recreation Funding
PRO Plan Update Definition of Park Facility Types
PRO PLAN UPDATE– GOALS & OBJECTIVES
PRO Plan Update Chapter 4
Acquisition Details: Owners: James E Joyce Sr. Revocable Intervivos Trust and Gloria A Joyce Revocable Intervivos Trust Location: Section 27, Town of.
Capital Facilities Study Session
Quarterly Budget Update 2017 Quarterly Reports
Presentation transcript:

PRO Plan Update: Level of Service Analysis Parks & Recreation Commission March 6, 2014

Chapter 4 – Demand Analysis Uses different measures to identify parks level of service (LOS) Defines standard and identifies deficiencies/surpluses in current and future system IE – police response times, traffic congestion levels

Chapter 4 – LOS Measures Ratio Standards Service Area Radius Traditional approach Easy to measure Doesn’t account for other values, quality of parks, other recreational opportunities Service Area Radius Accessibility of parks Geographic equity Harder to measure impact

Chapter 4 – LOS Measures Other approaches Park & open space acreage as percentage of total land area Public satisfaction with parks LOS for park amenities, ie sports fields Recommend excluding - Rationale for excluding amenities: arbitrary number, doesn’t reflect changing community needs, easily provided by private or non-profit sector

City LOS – Baseline vs. Planned - Note that total acres, including schools and HOA open space tracts, is 289 acres

Comparing to Other Cities If we include schools and non-City owned open space, our number is 26.3 – closer to Redmond.

If we include schools and non-City owned open space, our number is 26 If we include schools and non-City owned open space, our number is 26.3 – closer to Redmond.

Operating Projections - $450,000 surplus - Parks & Rec operations make up about 4% of the general fund

Parks Operating Projections Total Parks & Rec expenditures make up about 4% of the GF Trails - $1,200 - $1,500/mile/year depending on surface Active park like Wilmot - $23,000/acre/year Woodtrails purchase adds 50 acres If you build approx. 2.5 miles of trails (1 miles/20 acres) = $3,000 - $3,750 per year If it’s a more built up park w/ restroom = $30,000 – $50,000

Parks Capital Revenue Projections Total Parks & Rec expenditures make up about 4% of the GF Trails - $1,200 - $1,500/mile/year depending on surface Active park like Wilmot - $23,000/acre/year Woodtrails purchase adds 50 acres Trail development = $125/foot = over $1 million – remember, permits, design, construction! If you build approx. 2.5 miles of trails (1 miles/20 acres) = $3,000 - $3,750 per year in maintenance If it’s a more built up park w/ restroom = $15,000 – $20,000

Discussion Points Is our current LOS adequate? Should certain amenities be emphasized over others? Where do non-City parks and facilities fit in? What other measures should be included? How do we prioritize based on financial constraints? - Just as we might ask whether or not our police response times are fast enough, ask if our level of parks is enough? - ie trails might be more important than providing neighborhood parks – “trail city?” - Consider other sources – at some point, you can’t provide anymore - Other measures might include density, satisfaction