Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Macrophage ABCA2 deletion modulates intracellular cholesterol deposition, affects macrophage apoptosis, and decreases early atherosclerosis in LDL receptor.
Advertisements

Peyman Hadji, Robert Coleman, Michael Gnant 
Knockdown of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Type 1a Receptor (BMPR1a) in Breast Cancer Cells Protects Bone from Breast Cancer-Induced Osteolysis by Suppressing.
by Benjamin J. Frisch, John M. Ashton, Lianping Xing, Michael W
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Fate Restriction in the Growing and Regenerating Zebrafish Fin
A Liver-Bone Endocrine Relay by IGFBP1 Promotes Osteoclastogenesis and Mediates FGF21-Induced Bone Resorption  Xunde Wang, Wei Wei, Jing Y. Krzeszinski,
Mitochondrial ER Contacts Are Crucial for Mitophagy in Yeast
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Chromatin Effector Pygo2 Mediates Wnt-Notch Crosstalk to Suppress Luminal/Alveolar Potential of Mammary Stem and Basal Cells  Bingnan Gu, Kazuhide Watanabe,
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Loss of Vhl in cartilage accelerated the progression of age-associated and surgically induced murine osteoarthritis  T. Weng, Y. Xie, L. Yi, J. Huang,
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ling Yang, Ping Li, Suneng Fu, Ediz S. Calay, Gökhan S. Hotamisligil 
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 14, Pages (July 2008)
Peptide YY Regulates Bone Turnover in Rodents
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
ASXL1 impairs osteoclast formation by epigenetic regulation of NFATc1
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Makoto Takeo, Christopher S. Hale, Mayumi Ito 
NCOA4 Deficiency Impairs Systemic Iron Homeostasis
Timothy E. O’Sullivan, Lexus R. Johnson, Helen H. Kang, Joseph C. Sun 
Autophagy Links Inflammasomes to Atherosclerotic Progression
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Autophagy in proximal tubules protects against acute kidney injury
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Smurf1 Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation, Bone Formation, and Glucose Homeostasis through Serine 148  Junko Shimazu, Jianwen Wei, Gerard Karsenty  Cell.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Extracellular M. tuberculosis DNA Targets Bacteria for Autophagy by Activating the Host DNA-Sensing Pathway  Robert O. Watson, Paolo S. Manzanillo, Jeffery S.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Induces Osteoblast Inhibition by B Lymphocytes and Osteoclast Activation by T Lymphocytes during Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Rita U. Lukacs, Sanaz Memarzadeh, Hong Wu, Owen N. Witte 
Volume 77, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Chromatin Effector Pygo2 Mediates Wnt-Notch Crosstalk to Suppress Luminal/Alveolar Potential of Mammary Stem and Basal Cells  Bingnan Gu, Kazuhide Watanabe,
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Polarity Determinants Tea1p, Tea4p, and Pom1p Inhibit Division-Septum Assembly at Cell Ends in Fission Yeast  Yinyi Huang, Ting Gang Chew, Wanzhong Ge,
Autophagic Factors Cut to the Bone
Stem Cells and Osteoporosis Therapy
A Repair “Kit” for the Infarcted Heart
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
mTOR Inhibition Subdues Milk Disorder Caused by Maternal VLDLR Loss
NCOA4 Deficiency Impairs Systemic Iron Homeostasis
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 966-974 (November 2011) Autophagy Proteins Regulate the Secretory Component of Osteoclastic Bone Resorption  Carl J. DeSelm, Brian C. Miller, Wei Zou, Wandy L. Beatty, Eline van Meel, Yoshifumi Takahata, Judith Klumperman, Sharon A. Tooze, Steven L. Teitelbaum, Herbert W. Virgin  Developmental Cell  Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 966-974 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2011 21, 966-974DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 GFP-LC3 Localization to the Ruffled Border Is Atg5 Dependent (A) Confocal image of GFP-LC3 transgenic bone-residing osteoclast; CatK, blue; actin, red; GFP, green; cell perimeters, white. CatK and GFP-LC3 localize within the actin ring in the xy and orthogonal planes, representative of two experiments. (B) Percent of osteoclasts with GFP within the actin ring. Osteoclast precursors were transduced with GFP, GFP-LC3, or GFP-LC3G120A and differentiated on bone for 6 days; n = 40, pooled from two experiments. (C) Electron microscopy of a resorbing osteoclast on bone (B) with a developed ruffled border (RB) surrounded by actin rings (AR). (D) Immunogold labeling of GFP-LC3 in the ruffled border of a resorbing osteoclast. (E) Western blot of Atg5, p62, LC3, and β-actin in control and Atg5-deficient osteoclasts, representative of 6 experiments. (F) Bone-residing control and Atg5-deficient osteoclasts transduced with GFP-LC3 visualized by confocal microscopy; actin, green; CatK, red; cell perimeter, white. (G) Percentage of control and Atg5-deficient osteoclasts with GFP-LC3 concentrated within the actin ring; n = 40, pooled from two experiments. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 966-974DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Atg5- and Atg7-Deficient Osteoclasts Exhibit Defective Bone Pit Excavation and Lysosome Localization to the Resorptive Microenvironment (A) Control and Atg5-deficient bone-residing osteoclasts immunostained for actin (red) and exposed to FITC-wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which stains cells and bone pits green; white, cell perimeters. Bone was visualized in z plane by confocal microscopy before (top) and after removal of cells (bottom), representative of two experiments. (B) Normalized bone pit depth excavated by control and Atg5-deficient osteoclasts. Data from of four experiments (n = 100) were normalized to the average depth excavated by control cells as 100% and analyzed using paired t test. (C) 3D confocal images of FITC-WGA-stained bone pits excavated by control and Atg5-deficient osteoclasts used to determine pit volume; LSM software, one of two experiments shown, n = 7 per genotype per experiment. (D) Expression of Atg7, LC3, and β-actin in lysates of control or Atg7-deficient osteoclasts generated for 6 days on plastic; representative of three experiments. (E) Normalized bone pit depth excavated by control and Atg7-deficient osteoclasts; one of two experiments shown, n = 7 per genotype per experiment. (F) Representative confocal images of control and Atg5-deficient bone-residing osteoclasts; actin, green; CatK, red; cell perimeters, white. (G) Percentage of control or Atg5-deficient bone-residing osteoclasts with CatK or LAMP1 concentrated within the actin ring; n = 45, pooled from three experiments. (H) Percentage of control or Atg7-deficient bone-residing osteoclasts with CatK or LAMP1 localized in the actin ring; n = 30, pooled from two experiments. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 966-974DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Autophagy Proteins Mediate Ruffled Border Formation and Osteoclast Secretory Function (A) Representative electron micrographs of tibia-residing osteoclasts with absent (top), immature (middle), and mature (bottom) ruffled borders adjacent to actin rings (asterisk). (B) Percentage of control or Atg5-deficient osteoclasts exhibiting absent, immature, or mature ruffled borders; representative of two experiments, analyzed by chi-square test for trend, n = 30 cells per mouse per genotype. (C) Western blots for Atg5, LC3, or β-actin in control or Atg5-deficient osteoclasts transduced with mCherry-Atg5 or mCherry-Atg5K130R encoding retroviruses; ∗ denotes unknown bands, representative of three experiments. (D) Normalized bone pit depth excavated by retrovirally-transduced control or Atg5-deficient osteoclasts; n = 20, pooled from three experiments, analyzed by paired t test. (E) Percentage of osteoclasts with CatK concentrated within the actin ring in retrovirally-transduced control or Atg5-deficient osteoclasts; n = 45, pooled from three experiments. (F) Normalized bone pit depth excavated by WT osteoclasts retrovirally-transduced with empty vector (control) or mStraberry-Atg4BC74A, expressed as a percentage relative to control; n = 30, pooled from three experiments, analyzed by paired t test. (G) Percentage of cells with CatK localization in actin rings of WT osteoclasts transduced with empty vector (control) or Atg4BC74A; n = 45, representative of three experiments shown. (H) Percentage of cells with GFP-LC3 localized in the actin ring of vector (control) or Atg4BC74A transduced GFP-LC3 osteoclasts; n = 45, representative of two experiments. (I) Percentage of cells with Rab7 localized in the actin ring of control or Atg5-deficient osteoclasts; n = 60, pooled from four experiments. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 966-974DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Requirements for Atg5-Dependent Osteoclast Function In Vivo (A and B) Percentage of marrow space occupied by trabecular bone (BV/TV) of 8-week and 8-month-old female Atg5flox/flox or Atg5flox/flox-LyzM-Cre+ mice by microcomputed tomography; n = 12 8-week-old mice/genotype, n = 6 8-month-old Atg5flox/flox mice, n = 5 8-month-old Atg5flox/flox-LyzM-Cre+ mice. (C) Percentage of trabecular bone surface covered by TRAP+ osteoclasts determined by histomorphometry; n = 5 mice/genotype. (D) Number of osteoclasts per millimeter of femoral trabecular bone surface determined by histomorphometry; n = 5 mice/genotype. (E) Bone nodule formation by osteoblasts in vitro. Nodules were stained with alizarin red-S and quantified using densitometry; pooled from three experiments, n = 7 Atg5flox/flox mice, n = 10 Atg5flox/flox-LyzM-Cre+ mice. (F) Serum osteocalcin levels in 8-week-old Atg5flox/flox (n = 5) and Atg5flox/flox-LyzM-Cre+ mice (n = 6) mice. (G) Percentage of bone loss determined by BV/TV four weeks following ovariectomy. Ovariectomy (ovx) or sham operation was performed on Atg5flox/flox (8 ovx, 5 sham) or Atg5flox/flox-LyzM-Cre+ (7 ovx, 4 sham) mice. The average bone loss of sham-operated Atg5flox/flox animals was subtracted from all measurements. (H) Serum concentration of c-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx) determined 2 weeks postovariectomy; n = 6 mice per genotype. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 966-974DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions