Overview of San Francisco’s Public Financing Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission June 2007 Fair and Clean Elections Pilot Project 2007.
Advertisements

The National Voter Registration Act encouraged voting by A. Requiring states to allow election day registration B. Declaring election day a federal holiday.
WELCOME! City Clerks Meeting · November 4, 2014 General Election.

As of 9/30/2011.  IEA Political Action Committee (PAC)  Funded By $20 Annual Contributions From All IEA Members  Governed by Committee Composed of.
Districts In Good Standing. Origins Discussed at November 2010 meeting Approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission during January 2011 meeting.
Public Campaign Financing in New Mexico. What is Public Campaign Finance?  Public money used to pay all or part of a candidate’s campaign expenses in.
LOBBYING RULES IN MASSACHUSETTS: ARE YOU A LEGISLATIVE AGENT OR AN EXECUTIVE AGENT? Robert E. Cowden III Casner & Edwards, LLP 303 Congress Street Boston,
District 6380 Rotary Foundation Grant Management Seminar.
Mary Mosiman Deputy of Elections Iowa Secretary of State’s Office (515) CITY ELECTIONS 2012.
2011 Requirements Payments Instructions. Webinar Agenda 1.State Plan Updates 2.Instructions for Requesting Funds 3.Title III Certification 4.Minimum Payment.
FY 2012 Budget Update Policy and Fiscal Committee July 25, 2011.
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
Election Resources Introduction to IED The election division is a bi-partisan agency that: Certifies candidates and election results for candidates that.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Health Information Technology: State EHR Adoption Loan Program The adoption of health information.
Virginia Leadership Institute Political Fundraising Virginia Campaign Finance Law Kedric L. Payne November 7, 2009.
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
Amendments to Chapter III (Personnel) of the General Standards Comparison between the GS document and the one prepared by the GT-RVPP.
Money and Elections Chapter 7 Section 3.
City Elections Dawn Williams Director of Elections Iowa Secretary of State’s Office July, 2015.
FUNDS FOR CHANGE GRANT PROGRAM LESSONS LEARNED. To enhance the long-term growth and sustainability of NDBN member diaper banks. Provide financial assistance.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Special Library Levy November 18, 2004 State Library of Iowa and Iowa Library Service Areas.
Chapter 7 The Electoral Process Section 2 Money and Elections.
Hallandale Beach Charter Review Yury Konnikov President Florida Initiative for Electoral Reform.
Disclaimers, Yard Signs, and Campaign Finance Issues June 8, 2016
General Election – used to fill an elective office
ABOUT STUDENTS REGIONAL CONSORTIUM
School Site Council Training Roles and Responsibilities
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Excess Liability Trust Fund Claims Section (ELTF)
Limitations on Local Government
Political Parties.
Part 3: Nominations.
Board of Early Education and Care Planning and Evaluation Committee
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Money in Elections and Improving the Election Process
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Elections Chapter 7.
FCCLA and AT&T Access Program Partnership
Winning Office -Elections have two important parts -Nomination Process
C H A P T E R 7 The Electoral Process
Political Party Organization
Economic Development Department 4th quarterly report
Elections LG: I will analyze the presidential campaign process and cost of elections.
5def Rising Campaign Cost
WIOA Annual Performance Report
Best Practices in Payroll/Personnel Implementing Pay Raises
Matching Grants PP June Jonet
Nominations and Campaigns
NEW YORK STATE ETHICS LAW
Vacancies and Vacancy-Filling Procedures
Kevin Towns Associate Director Johns Hopkins University
Timeline & Key Dates Relative to the 2018 General Elections
Vacancies and Vacancy-Filling Procedures
Cancellation of an Election
10.5 Financing Election Campaigns.
RECALLS AND CLEAN ELECTIONS.
GRANT MANAGEMENT SEMINAR
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
American Government The Electoral Process
POLITICAL PARTY FUNDING BILL Presentation to Ad Hoc Committee on the Funding of Political Parties (NCOP) Date:
The Election Process Primary ~ an election for a to choose the
Mandate & Activities of PC: Home Affairs in Relation to Organs of State 29 July 2014.
Thematic areas and overview of the opportunities for bilateral cooperation under the Active Citizens Fund Bulgaria Bilateral Workshop between Bulgarian.
POST-ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE
A Presentation to: Wisconsin Government Finance Officers Association
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process
American Government Chapter 7 Section 3.
Standardization Changes
Presentation transcript:

Overview of San Francisco’s Public Financing Program Informational Presentation and Discussion San Francisco Ethics Commission July 20, 2018 Regular Meeting

Contents What are the goals, and how is the program funded? What financing may candidates receive under the program? What steps must a candidate complete in order to receive money under the program? What are the requirements for each step? What is the deadline for each step? How do spending limits work? sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

I. Program Goals Incentivize candidates to limit their spending Voter Information Pamphlet – Nov. 2000 Proposition O Incentivize candidates to limit their spending Limit IE spending Decrease time candidates spend raising money Increase opportunity for candidates to run for office Insure the integrity of the electoral process sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

I. Program Goals Reduce incumbent advantage/increase competitiveness Purpose and Intent of CFRO Section 1.100 Reduce incumbent advantage/increase competitiveness Enhance discussion of issues - assist voters in making informed decisions Restore trust in government sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

I. Program Funding Election Campaign Fund Each fiscal year, $2.75 per resident is appropriated Approximately 880,000 residents = $2,420,000 Additional appropriations if vacancies occur Total fund level is capped at $7 million sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

II. Public Financing Candidates May Receive Three Sequential Phases One-Time Initial Grant upon Qualification Mayoral Candidates: $100,000 Supervisorial Candidates: $20,000 2:1 Matching Phase Mayoral Candidates: First $425,000 of matchable funds Supervisorial Candidates: First $50,000 of matchable funds 1:1 Matching Phase Mayoral Candidates: Final $25,000 of matchable funds ($12,5000 for incumbents) Supervisorial Candidates: Final $35,000 of matchable funds ($32,500 for incumbents) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Profile of Funds: Mayoral Candidates Total: $975,000 Total: $962,500 Total: $512,500 Total: $500,000 Eligible Funds Raised by Candidate Public Funds Available Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Candidate’s Total Funds Profile of Funds: Mayoral Candidates Candidate’s Total Funds Total: $1,475,000 Total: $1,475,000 ***Publicly financed mayoral candidates may not spend more than $1,475,000. (This limit can be raised, as discussed in Section III). Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Profile of Funds: Supervisorial Candidates Total: $155,000 Total: $152,500 Total: $95,000 Total: $97,500 Eligible Funds Raised by Candidate Eligible Funds Raised by Candidate Public Funds Available Public Funds Available Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Candidate’s Total Funds Profile of Funds: Supervisorial Candidates Candidate’s Total Funds Total: $250,000 ***Publicly financed supervisorial candidates may not spend more than $250,000. (This limit can be raised, as discussed in Section III). Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

III. Overview of Public Financing Application 2. File Statement of Participation 3. File Qualifying Request Review Qualifying Request 4. File Matching Requests Review Qualifying Requests Review Matching Requests Candidate Action Ethics Commission Action 1. Open Campaign sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

File Candidate Intention Statement (Form 501) 1. Open Campaign File Nomination Papers and Declaration of Candidacy with Elections Department Deadline: 147 day before the election File Candidate Intention Statement (Form 501) Deadline: before raising or spending any money Open committee bank account File Statement of Organization (Form 410) Deadline: within 10 days of receiving $2,000 in contributions sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

III. Overview of Public Financing Application 3. File Qualifying Request Review Qualifying Request 4. File Matching Requests Review Qualifying Requests Review Matching Requests Candidate Action Ethics Commission Action 1. Open Campaign 2. File Statement of Participation sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

2. File Statement of Participation File Statement of Participation (Form SFEC-1.142(a)) To declare intention to participate in public financing program Deadline: same day as deadline for candidate nomination papers (147th day before the election, unless extended) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

III. Overview of Public Financing Application 1. Open Campaign Review Qualifying Request 4. File Matching Requests Review Qualifying Requests Review Matching Requests Candidate Action Ethics Commission Action 2. File Statement of Participation 3. File Qualifying Request sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

3. File Qualifying Request File Qualifying Request (Form SFEC-142(b)-2) Declaration that candidate meets all program requirements: Is opposed by at least one candidate who has raised a certain level of funds (or qualified for public financing) Has raised the required level of Qualifying Contributions $50,000 for non-incumbent mayoral candidates ($75,000 for incumbents) $10,000 for non-incumbent supervisorial candidates ($15,000 for incumbents) Between $10-100 in size From SF residents (excluding family members) Received between 18 months and 70 days before election Has no outstanding filings or penalties Will comply with all program rules Supporting documentation to prove qualifying contributions sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

3. File Qualifying Request File Qualifying Request (Form SFEC-142(b)-2) Deadline: 70th day before the election Refiling Withdraw and refile new request Any time before E-70 Resubmission After rejection, amend request and resubmit Within 5 days of rejection, AND before E-60 sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

III. Overview of Public Financing Application 1. Open Campaign 2. File Statement of Participation Review Qualifying Request Review Qualifying Requests Review Matching Request(s) Candidate Action Ethics Commission Action 3. File Qualifying Request 4. File Matching Request(s) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

4. File Matching Request(s) File Matching Request(s) up to maximum amount An eligible matching contribution must be: Between $10-100 in size From SF residents (excluding family members) Received between 18 months and 70 days before election Matching requests must be submitted in minimum batch sizes Mayoral candidates: $5,000 ($1,000 within final 14 days) Supervisorial candidates: $1,000 ($200 within final 14 days) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

III. Overview of Public Financing Application 3. File Qualifying Request 1. Open Campaign 2. File Statement of Participation Review Qualifying Request Review Qualifying Requests Review Matching Request(s) Candidate Action Ethics Commission Action 4. File Matching Request(s) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Threshold Filings (Not formally part of the application process) All mayoral and supervisorial candidates must report when their contributions or expenditures reach: Mayoral candidates: $50,000 Supervisorial candidates: $10,000 Once one candidate is certified for public financing, all candidates in that race must additionally continue to report: Mayoral candidates: $1,000,000, and every $50,000 beyond that ($1,050,000, $1,100,000, $1,150,000, …) Supervisorial candidates: $100,000, and every $10,000 beyond that ($110,000, $120,000, $130,000, …) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

IV. Spending Limits Individual Expenditure Ceiling (IEC) All publicly financed candidates begin with the same IEC Mayoral: $1,475,000 Supervisorial: $250,000 (Initial IEC is equal to maximum public funds attainable + private needed to achieve this) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Candidate’s Total Funds Profile of Funds: Mayoral Candidates Candidate’s Total Funds Total: $1,475,000 Total: $1,475,000 ***Publicly financed mayoral candidates may not spend more than $1,475,000. (This limit can be raised). Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Candidate’s Total Funds Profile of Funds: Supervisorial Candidates Candidate’s Total Funds Total: $250,000 ***Publicly financed supervisorial candidates may not spend more than $250,000. (This limit can be raised). Non-Incumbents Incumbents sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Raising the IEC The IEC can be raised Raised in increments Candidate-by-candidate determination (there is no general IEC for a given race) Raised in increments $100,000 for mayoral candidates $10,000 for supervisorial candidates ED makes determination based on filings received Threshold forms (1.152) and Campaign Statements (460) IE Reports (496) Electioneering Communications (1.162) & Member Communications (1.163) sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Formula for Raising the IEC Supportive Funds (of best-funded opponent) + Opposition Spending (against the candidate) ___________________________________________ = New IEC for the Candidate* *Rounded down to nearest increment sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Formula for Raising the IEC Supportive Funds Money that supports a given candidate Contributions raised by the candidate (excluding funds raised in excess of the candidate’s IEC, if publicly financed) IE Spending in support of the candidate Electioneering Communications in support of the candidate Member Communications in support of the candidate First step in IEC raise: determine which of the candidate’s opponents has the highest level of Total Supportive Funds sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Formula for Raising the IEC Opposition Spending IE Spending against the candidate Second step in IEC raise determination: what is the level of Total Opposition Spending against the candidate? sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Formula for Raising the IEC Supportive Funds (of best-funded opponent) + Opposition Spending (against the candidate) ___________________________________________ = New IEC for the Candidate* *Rounded down to nearest increment sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Formula for Raising the IEC - Example $250,000 $300,000 IEC = $250,000 1 2 1) Total Supportive Funds (Opponent) Candidate 2 Raises $200,000 IE groups spend $85,000 supporting Candidate 2 Total Supportive Funds for Candidate 2 = $285,000 2) Total Opposition Spending (Candidate 1) $305,000 IE groups spend $20,000 opposing Candidate 1 Opposition Spending against Candidate 1 = $20,000 sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Next Steps Policy Division is engaged in evaluating the Public Financing program. Is the program effective? Analysis of recent elections Comparison to other jurisdictions (including Seattle) Are funds misused? What changes could improve the program? Application process? Model of candidate funding? Expenditure limit mechanism? sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Resources for Candidates Supplemental Guide https://sfethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Supplemental-Guide-for- Candidates-for-the-Board-of-Supervisors-2018.pdf Website https://sfethics.org/compliance/campaigns/candidates/public-financing- program sfethics.org Public Financing Overview | SF Ethics Commission | July 20, 2018

Overview of San Francisco’s Public Financing Program Informational Presentation and Discussion San Francisco Ethics Commission July 20, 2018 Regular Meeting