Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Top X interactions of PIN Network A interactions Coverage of Network A Figure S1 - Network A interactions are distributed evenly across the top 60,000.
Advertisements

Volume 16, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Ruth B. McCole, Jelena Erceg, Wren Saylor, Chao-ting Wu  Cell Reports 
P53 Mediates Vast Gene Expression Changes That Contribute to Poor Chemotherapeutic Response in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer  Crystal Tonnessen-Murray,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Rhythmic Working Memory Activation in the Human Hippocampus
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Cross-Tissue Regulatory Gene Networks in Coronary Artery Disease
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Cell-Line Selectivity Improves the Predictive Power of Pharmacogenomic Analyses and Helps Identify NADPH as Biomarker for Ferroptosis Sensitivity  Kenichi.
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Cortical Sensory Responses Are Enhanced by the Higher-Order Thalamus
Matias J. Ison, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Itzhak Fried  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages (November 2016)
Identification and Validation of Genetic Variants that Influence Transcription Factor and Cell Signaling Protein Levels  Ronald J. Hause, Amy L. Stark,
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Inference of Environmental Factor-Microbe and Microbe-Microbe Associations from Metagenomic Data Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Model  Yuqing.
Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
PheWAS and Beyond: The Landscape of Associations with Medical Diagnoses and Clinical Measures across 38,662 Individuals from Geisinger  Anurag Verma,
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Cross-Tissue Regulatory Gene Networks in Coronary Artery Disease
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Linking Memories across Time via Neuronal and Dendritic Overlaps in Model Neurons with Active Dendrites  George Kastellakis, Alcino J. Silva, Panayiota.
A Flexible Bayesian Framework for Modeling Haplotype Association with Disease, Allowing for Dominance Effects of the Underlying Causative Variants  Andrew.
Towfique Raj, Manik Kuchroo, Joseph M
A Visual Framework for Classifying Determinants of Cell Size
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Malika Kumar Freund, Kathryn S
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Miquel Duran-Frigola, Patrick Aloy  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Sherlock: Detecting Gene-Disease Associations by Matching Patterns of Expression QTL and GWAS  Xin He, Chris K. Fuller, Yi Song, Qingying Meng, Bin Zhang,
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Structural Architecture of SNP Effects on Complex Traits
Matthieu Foll, Oscar E. Gaggiotti, Josephine T
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Diego Calderon, Anand Bhaskar, David A
Evan G. Williams, Johan Auwerx  Cell 
Shusuke Numata, Tianzhang Ye, Thomas M
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Inhibitory Actions Unified by Network Integration
Varying Intolerance of Gene Pathways to Mutational Classes Explain Genetic Convergence across Neuropsychiatric Disorders  Shahar Shohat, Eyal Ben-David,
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e3 (November 2018)
Kristy A. Sundberg, Jude F. Mitchell, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Genotype-Imputation Accuracy across Worldwide Human Populations
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
The Zfhx3-Mediated Axis Regulates Sleep and Interval Timing in Mice
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e4 (May 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 835-848 (May 2015) A Systems Approach Identifies Networks and Genes Linking Sleep and Stress: Implications for Neuropsychiatric Disorders  Peng Jiang, Joseph R. Scarpa, Karrie Fitzpatrick, Bojan Losic, Vance D. Gao, Ke Hao, Keith C. Summa, He S. Yang, Bin Zhang, Ravi Allada, Martha H. Vitaterna, Fred W. Turek, Andrew Kasarskis  Cell Reports  Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 835-848 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Design and Analytic Approach A population of (B6 × A/J) F2 mice underwent a chronic unpredictable stress protocol, data collected during which enables modeling of genetic and molecular networks underlying responses to these stresses. (A) The sequence of chronic unpredictable stress treatments and phenotypic data collection (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details). (B) Schematic diagram of the molecular and physiological data collection and integrative analysis. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Phenotypic Interactions Observed in the Chronically Stressed (B6 × A/J) F2 Mice (A–D) Correlation coefficients between pairs of phenotypes. The phenotypes were ordered according to their phenotypic categories. (E–H) Statistical significance of observed associations. The phenotypes were ordered exactly the same as in (A–D). BL, baseline; SDR, sleep deprivation recovery; Rst, after restraint stress; AUC, area under the curve. Note that 93 sleep measurements that were not grouped into any of the sleep categories are not presented here, but are included in Table S2. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of QTL that Influence Stress and Sleep Phenotypes (A) Genetic landscape of stress and sleep. Genomic locations of the 142 identified QTL (FDR < 0.2) are shown (also see Table S3). BL, baseline; SDR, sleep deprivation recovery; Rst, after restraint stress. (B) A highly significant QTL for plasma TSH level on Chr.4. LOD, log of odds. (C) Median ± interquartile range of plasma TSH level as a function of genotype at rs4224864, the most strongly associated SNP in the Chr.4 QTL region. (D) Distinct QTL were linked to blood pressure measured at different times of the chronic stress protocol. (E) Baseline plasma glucose levels were linked to QTL with consistent effect throughout the chronic stress treatment as well as QTL specific to different stages of the protocol. Note that while a 6-hr fasting procedure preceded the glucose tolerance test and the glucose measurement at time 0 (i.e., week 7), it did not appear to have a significant effect on the genetic control of glucose, as it did not result in presence or absence of a QTL specific to the baseline glucose measurement at week 7. The most distinct genetic regulations of baseline glucose levels were observed between week 2 (i.e., most naive) and weeks 12 and 13 (i.e., most experienced). Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Network View of Striatal Genes Causal to Selected Behavioral and Sleep Phenotypes Circles represent genes and squares represent phenotypic categories. The circle is sized in proportion to the number of phenotypes for which the gene tests causal. Circles and squares are colored according to phenotype categories, with colors assigned to genes from the category of the phenotypes for which the genes test causal. The five pink circles represent genes causal to phenotypes of multiple distinct categories. (Insert) The number of genes found causal to at least one phenotype in each category. BL, baseline; SDR, sleep deprivation recovery; Rst, after restraint stress. See Table S4 for the full list. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Identification of Gene Co-expression Modules Relevant to Selected Behavioral and Sleep Phenotypes (A) The topological overlap matrix (TOM) plot corresponds to the striatal gene co-expression network. Darker color indicate stronger co-regulation between a pair of genes (in rows and columns). Gene modules are identified by hierarchical clustering of the matrix, as labeled by arbitrarily assigned color bars on the top and at the left. (B) Identification of modules (rows) significantly associated with selected phenotypes (columns) organized in categories. Gene modules are indicated by their assigned color at the left. Red bars indicate significant associations (p < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05). (C) Ranking of modules (rows) based on relevance to individual phenotypic categories and combined categories of interest (columns). Module rankings for a phenotypic category were determined by the number of significant module-trait associations within the phenotypic category. For a combination of multiple phenotypic categories, rankings for each category were summed to determine a composite ranking for each module. Darker color indicate higher ranking. The actual rankings are also labeled. BL, baseline sleep; SDR, sleep deprivation recovery; Rst, sleep after restraint stress. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Striatal Bayesian Networks Downstream of Mical2 Each node represents a gene and each directed edge indicates a causal link between genes. Nodes are colored according to their module assignments, using the names of the respective modules. Key driver genes are represented by larger square nodes. Nodes with red rims denote homologs of human GWAS candidates for neuropsychiatric disorders, and nodes with yellow rims denote candidate genes identified in this study as causal to stress and sleep phenotypes. One node is labeled with a half red and half yellow rim, as the represented gene (St8sia2) is a both reported GWAS candidate for bipolar disorder and tested causal to a REM sleep phenotype in this study. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Striatal Bayesian Networks Downstream of Htt and Bsn Each node represents a gene and each directed edge indicates a causal link between genes. Nodes are colored according to their module assignments, using the names of the respective modules. Key driver genes are represented by larger square nodes. Cell Reports 2015 11, 835-848DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.003) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions